RETHINKING THE FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF SOCIAL INSURANCE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE IN THE FACE OF UNPREDICTABILITY

  • Liudmyla Stozhok Kyiv National Economics University named after Vadym Hetman, 54/1, Beresteysky prospect, Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1424-763X
Keywords: Social Insurance, Human Capital, Social Vulnerability, Social Risks, Functions, Social Justice

Abstract

The socio-economic development of the country, according to the international institutions’ recommendations, is the ability of society to effectively meet the current needs of the population, which are changing under the influence of globalization, digitalization, and the transition to a green economy, taking into account human-centered and inclusive management approaches. However, the reality of the Ukraine’s development scenario in the context of the war and its consequences requires not only determination in actions and resources but also integrity, increased awareness of responsibility for the formation of a society with new participants, where the “people of war” take the lead. The purpose of this article is to reveal the content of the social insurance system, taking into account the need to rethink its functional capacity and significance in ensuring the sustainability of society. The study employed such methods as scientific generalizations, system analysis, and structural and logical synthesis. On the basis of the processed scientific material, as well as the analysis of current challenges, the paper substantiates the author's position on the importance of social insurance in protecting employment income and the variability of life, which is based on the occurrence of social risks. The scientific views on the functioning of the mechanism of protection against social risks and their dynamics under the influence of new challenges are studied and structured in order to highlight key aspects. Based on the analysis of social challenges, the author substantiates the need to detail the functions of social insurance, which are based on the support of income from employment throughout life. Accordingly, it is proved that, given the challenges of today, the main elements of the functional significance of social insurance are income support, poverty reduction, reduction of sensitivity to social vulnerability, promotion of economic mobility and rapid response, intergenerational economic support, investment in human capital, promotion of inclusiveness, adaptation and social integration. The analysis demonstrates that a meaningful social insurance system, taking into account the principles of functioning, is able to respond to modern challenges. At the same time, it is noted that the realization of functions depends on changes in the labor market, education market, health care system, as well as on political views and integrity policy. The author emphasizes that social insurance is an integral part of both social security and economic reforms. The author argues that the capacity of the social insurance system is ensured by economic stability, which in turn depends on the efficiency of social insurance. It is proved that social insurance is not only a mechanism of protection against social risks, as is commonly believed, but also an institution of the social protection system, the main task of which is to support protection in order to prevent inequality, thereby ensuring equal opportunities for the quality realization of social rights throughout life with an individual focus on development and sustainability, as well as a steadily growing legacy for future generations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Liudmyla Stozhok, Kyiv National Economics University named after Vadym Hetman, 54/1, Beresteysky prospect, Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine

PhD in Economics

References

Kundo, H. K., Spencer, R., Brueckner, M., & Davis, J. K. (2024). Social protection for transformative resilience: do programmes really address underlying causes of vulnerability of subsistence farmers to climate change? Local Environment, 29(3), 339–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2309501

Tenzing, J. D. (2019). Integrating social protection and climate change adaptation: A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.626

Kidd, S., Nycander, G. A., Tran, А., & Cretney, M. (2020). The social contract and the role of universal social security in building trust in government. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27757.10728

Tamai, T. (2023). Social security, economic growth, and social welfare in an overlapping generation model with idiosyncratic TFP shock and heterogeneous workers. Journal of Population Economics, 36, 1829–1862. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-022-00934-w

Hunt, С. E., & Caliendo, F. N. (2022). Social security and risk sharing: A survey of four decades of economic analysis Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12492

Hunt, С. E., & Caliendo, F. N. (2023). Social security and risk sharing: Тhe role of economic mobility across generations. Int Tax Public Finance, 30, 1374–1407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-022-09761-x

Hunt, С. E., & Caliendo F. N. (2022). Social security and longevity risk: Тhe case of risky bequest income. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 26(6), 1647–1678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100521000018

Sen, P. (2023). Social security reform and welfare in a two sector model. The Japanese Economic Review, 74, 233–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-021-00105-8

Aleksandrova, М., & Costella, С. (2021) Reaching the poorest and most vulnerable: addressing loss and damage through social protection Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 121–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.010

Khan, U., & Stinchcombe, M.B. (2023). Intergenerational equity and sustainability: a large population approach. Soc Choice Welf. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01450-w

Costella, С., van Aalst, M., Georgiadou, Y., Slater, R., Reilly, R., McCord, A., Holmes, R., Ammoun, J., & Barca, V. (2023). Can social protection tackle emerging risks from climate change, and how? A framework and a critical review. Climate Risk Management, 40, 100501, 16 р. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100501

Aleksandrova, M. (2019). Principles and considerations for mainstreaming climate change risk into national social protection frameworks in developing countries. Climate and Development, 12(6), 511–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1642180

Libanova, E, & Romaniuk, S. (2023). Conceptualization of Governance in Social Relations. Demography and Social Economy, 3(53), 33–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2023.03.033 (in Ukrainian)

Libanova, E. (2024). Resilience of the Socio-Economic System of Ukraine to the Shocks Caused by the War: Specifics of Formation and Response. Demography and Social Economy, 4(58), 3–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.04.003 (in Ukrainian)

Vlasenko, R., & Yatsenko, L. (2023). Social Risks: Factors and Consequences. Strategic Panorama, 1, 37–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.1.2023.04 (in Ukrainian)

Novikov, V. (2024). Social Protection: Terminological Definition, Fundamentals and Management Tools. Demography and Social Economy, 3(57), 79–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2024.03.079 (in Ukrainian)

Lopushniak ,H., Verkhovod, І., Lipskyi, R., Gorokhovska, О., & Kliuienko, E. (2024). La política social en la organización: problemas y tendencias. Interacción Y Perspectiva Revista De Trabajo Social, 14(1), 314–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10909412

Cherenko, L. (2023). Targeting of Social Programs at Vulnerable Croups: Sustainable Trends and Post-War Prospects. Demography and Social Economy, 1(51), 73–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2023.01.073 (in Ukrainian)

Lopushniak H., Verkhovod I., Oleksenko R., & Vonberg T. (2023). Evaluación de la reforma del sistema de protección social en el contexto de la consecución de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Interacción Y Perspectiva Revista De Trabajo Social, 14(2), 26–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8319394

Kolot, A. (2023). Resolution of Social and Labor Conflicts in the Basis of Partnership and Social Responsibility. Economy and Society, 49. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-49-14

Peled, D. (1982). Informational diversity over time and the optimahty of monetary equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory, 28, 255–274. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90061-8

Fetscher, V. (2023). Explaining support for redistribution: social insurance systems and fairness. Political Science Research and Methods, 11(3), 588–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2022.48

De Rouck, E., & Antoine, M. (2024). Access to the labour market and social protection for people with disabilities. Belgium – SPF, EU. Retrieved from https://socialprotection.org/discover/publications/access-labour-market-and-social-protection-people-disabilities

Published
2025-04-06
How to Cite
Stozhok, L. (2025). RETHINKING THE FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF SOCIAL INSURANCE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL JUSTICE IN THE FACE OF UNPREDICTABILITY. Social Economics, (69), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2025-69-21
Section
FINANCE