ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Abstract
The relevance of this study is driven by the growing need for high-precision macroeconomic forecasting tools for the Republic of Moldova — a small open economy that is historically highly exposed to external price shocks, significant energy import dependence, and continuous real sector volatility. Traditional forecasting methods have shown their limitations during recent crisis periods, emphasizing the demand for more advanced analytical frameworks. The purpose of this research is to conduct a comprehensive comparative assessment of the predictive capacity of three distinct model classes — multiple linear regression (MLR), Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks. These models are applied to forecasting Moldova's inflation rates and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth based on macroeconomic data spanning the period from 2018 to 2025. The empirical information base is derived exclusively from official publications provided by the National Bank of Moldova (NBM) and the National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. To ensure methodological rigor, the quality and accuracy of the models were evaluated and cross-validated using standard statistical metrics, specifically Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The comparative results compellingly show that the deep learning LSTM model demonstrates significant and consistent superiority over traditional econometrics. Specifically, it reduces the RMSE of inflation forecasts from 1.139 (linear regression) and 0.973 (ARIMA) down to 0.354, while improving the MAPE from 21.4% and 17.3% to a highly accurate 6.85%, respectively. Furthermore, a generated scenario forecast for the upcoming 2026–2027 period indicates that inflation will likely consolidate near 5.0% and 4.5%, which remains entirely consistent with the NBM's established target corridor. Additionally, GDP growth in the baseline scenario is projected at stable rates of 2.2% in 2026 and 3.0% in 2027. The practical value and novelty of this study lie in the potential direct integration of the proposed AI-driven predictive models into the strategic analytical systems of the National Bank and the Ministry of Economic Development and Digitalization of the Republic of Moldova, thereby enhancing policy formulation under uncertainty.
Downloads
References
Yang Liu, Ran Pan, and Rui Xu. "Mending the Crystal Ball: Enhanced Inflation Forecasts with Machine Learning", IMF Working Papers 2024, 206 (2024), accessed 25.06.2026, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400285387.001.
Jönsson, K. (2026), Forecasting Quarterly GDP Growth Rates Using Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70184.
Grigorescu, Aura Elena. "Artificial Intelligence in Central Banking." Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, vol. 18, no. 1, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 2024, pp. 1892-1901, https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0159.
Bondarenko, K., Strilets, V., & Shevchenko, D. (2024). Forecasting economic indicators using the LSTM model. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series «Mathematical Modeling. Information Technology. Automated Control Systems», 64, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.26565/2304-6201-2024-64-02
Skolastika Kadang, Vivi Peggie Rantung (2026). Comparison of LSTM and ARIMA Methods in Predicting the Inflation Rate in Manado City. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications, 5(2), 2564–2571. https://ioinformatic.org/index.php/JAIEA/article/view/1929
Lenzu, S (2026), ‘DP21248 Artificial Intelligence and Monetary Policy: A Framework and Perspective on Cyclical Transmission, Structural Transition, and Financial Stability‘, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 21248. CEPR Press, Paris & London. https://cepr.org/publications/dp21248
Mirza, N., Rizvi, S. K. A., Naqvi, B., & Umar, M. (2024). Inflation prediction in emerging economies: Machine learning and FX reserves integration for enhanced forecasting. International Review of Financial Analysis. Article: 103238 Volume: Volume 94 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103238
Anesti, N., Kalamara, E., & Kapetanios, G. (2024). Forecasting with Machine Learning methods and multiple large datasets. Econometrics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosta.2024.08.003
Gonçalves, J. V. M., Alexandre, M., & Lima, G. T. (2023). ARIMA and LSTM: A Comparative Analysis of Financial Time Series. Working Paper FEA-USP, https://ideas.repec.org/p/spa/wpaper/2023wpecon13.html
Orazio Angelini, Andrea Gabrielli, Andrea Tacchella, Andrea Zaccaria, Luciano Pietronero, T. Di Matteo "Forecasting the countries' gross domestic product growth: The case of technological fitness." Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2024. Volume 184, July 2024, 115006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115006.
Goulet Coulombe, P., Leroux, M., Stevanovic, D., & Surprenant, S. (2022). How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(5), 920-964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2910
Medeiros, M. C., Vasconcelos, G. F., Veiga, Á., & Zilberman, E. (2021). Forecasting inflation in a data-rich environment: the benefits of machine learning methods. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39(1), 98-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2019.1637745
Baumeister, C., & Hamilton, J. D. (2019). Structural interpretation of vector autoregressions with incomplete identification: Revisiting the role of oil supply and demand shocks. American Economic Review, 109(5), 1873-1910. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151569
Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Namin, A. S. (2018). A comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in forecasting time series. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 1394-1401. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00227
Fotopoulou, E., Maduako, I., Srivastava, P., & Sbrancia, M. B. (2026). Nowcasting Economic Growth with Machine Learning and Satellite Data. IMF Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229037471.001
Chakraborty, C., & Joseph, A. (2017). Machine learning at central banks. Bank of England Working Paper No. 674. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/working-paper/2017/machine-learning-at-central-banks.pdf
ameh, T., & Victor, A. O. (2026). Inflation Prediction: A Hybrid Time-Series Approach. DBS Applied Research and Theory Journal, 3(1). https://journal.dbs.ie/index.php/dbs/article/view/158/84
Lim, B., & Zohren, S. (2021). Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194), 20200209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0209
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.04.014
Doerr, S., Gambacorta, L., & Serena Garralda, J. M. (2021). Big data and machine learning in central banking. BIS Working Papers No 930. https://www.bis.org/publ/work930.pdf
Lenza, M., & Primiceri, E. (2022). How to estimate a vector autoregression after March 2020. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(4), 688-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2895
Pesaran, M. H., Pick, A., & Pranovich, M. (2013). Optimal forecasts in the presence of structural breaks. Journal of Econometrics, 177(2), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.04.002

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.