CORPORATE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT IN ENERGY INDEPENDENCE OF ENTERPRISES: ROLE IN SHAPING THE SOCIOECONOMIC VALUE OF THE EMPLOYER BRAND
Abstract
The article examines the mechanisms for transforming socially responsible investment into an effective tool for shaping the socio-economic value of an employer brand within the framework of domestic technology enterprises. The author substantiated that, in conditions of systemic infrastructure instability, the long payback period of energy projects—which, according to classical financial models, exceeds sixteen years—necessitates a shift toward the concept of a continuity premium. Under this approach, investments are capitalized not only through direct resource savings but primarily through ensuring the operational stability of business processes and offsetting costs associated with forced staff downtime.
Based on an adapted methodology for assessing carbon impact and the principles of cognitive ergonomics, the author proposes a model of an autonomous workspace aimed at minimizing the phenomenon of energy precarization among specialists. The author pays particular attention to the socio-technical aspect of veterans’ reintegration. The study demonstrated that engaging this category of employees in roles as security operators and monitors of office energy systems contributes to their professional stabilization by restoring a subjective sense of control over the work environment.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in expanding theoretical approaches to assessing the effectiveness of socially responsible investment by introducing the definition “Sustainability as an Advantage” into scientific discourse. Unlike existing methodologies, the study proposes for the first time to consider energy self-sufficiency not as an infrastructure cost, but as a strategic component of the employer’s value proposition, integrating environmental standards with the psychological safety of personnel.
The study identifies the role of environmentally oriented software development in reducing indirect emissions. It also examines how social responsibility indicators influence the cost of capital. The article established that the implementation of socially responsible investing into a company’s HR strategy allows for the transformation of technical infrastructure parameters into a strategic intangible asset. This directly influences the strengthening of the employer brand’s position and the dynamics of employee loyalty indices amid global and local economic turbulence.
The methodological basis of the study was a comprehensive approach based on a combination of methods for financial modeling of high-reliability uninterruptible power supply systems and analytical processing of experts’ infrastructure expectations. Within the framework of modeling the socioeconomic effect, the parameters of the value of saved working time and employee behavior patterns under conditions of power grid capacity shortages were verified. The results confirm that implementing the proposed model reduces the actual payback period of projects to three to four years by incorporating non-financial indicators into the company’s total cost structure. The practical significance of this work lies in the development of a “resilience as a competitive advantage” toolkit that management can use to optimize strategies for retaining human capital and socially rehabilitating the veteran segment of the workforce by giving them a leading role in managing business resilience.
Downloads
References
Guan, Y., An, K., Zheng, X., Zhang, S., & Wang, C. (2025). Global engagement lowers investment gaps in renewable energy deployment. iScience, 28(9), Article 113277. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113277
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. http://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Perera, K., Kuruppuarachchi, D., Kumarasinghe, S., & Suleman, M. T. (2023). The impact of carbon disclosure and carbon emissions intensity on firms' idiosyncratic volatility. Energy Economics, 128, Article 107053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107053
Busch, T., Johnson, M., & Pioch, T. (2022). Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(1), 350–363. http://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13008
García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2025). ESG controversies and external assurance: Examining their impact on firm value and image. British Accounting Review. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101704
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, Article 101716. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Daumas, L. (2023). Financial stability, stranded assets and the low-carbon transition ‒ A critical review of the theoretical and applied literatures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 37(3), 701–731. http://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12551
Anquetin, T., Coqueret, G., Tavin, B., & Welgryn, L. (2022). Scopes of carbon emissions and their impact on green portfolios. Economic Modelling, 115, 105951. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105951
Mardi, H. (2022). Mitigating the carbon footprint of generative AI for environmental sustainability: Strategies and techniques. International Journal of Communication and Information Technology, 3(2), 60–64. http://doi.org/10.33545/2707661X.2022.v3.i2a.182
Cai, S., & Gou, Z. (2024). Towards energy-efficient data centers: A comprehensive review of passive and active cooling strategies. Energy and Built Environment. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2024.08.009
Dhayanithi, J., & Hotta, T. K. (2025). Optimization of temperature distribution in building envelopes of Ahmedabad region using nano-encapsulated phase change material. Energy and Built Environment, 6(5), 796–808. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2024.03.004
Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984–986. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3758
Safari, A., Sorouri, H., Rahimi, A., & Oshnoei, A. (2025). A systematic review of energy efficiency metrics for optimizing cloud data center operations and management. Electronics, 14(11), 2214. http://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112214
Hettler, M., & Graf-Vlachy, L. (2023). Corporate scope 3 carbon emission reporting as an enabler of supply chain decarbonization: A systematic review and comprehensive research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(1), 256–280. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3486
Cregan, C., Kelly, J. A., & Clinch, J. P. (2023). Are environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings reliable indicators of emissions outcomes? A case study of the airline industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 164–177. http://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2608
Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2024). Are carbon emissions associated with stock returns? Review of Finance, 28(1), 75–106. http://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfad013
Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (2003). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 7(1), Article 4. http://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1024
Sawalha, I. H. (2021). Views on business continuity and disaster recovery. International Journal of Emergency Services, 10(3), 351–365.
Theurer, C. P., Tumasjan, A., Welpe, I. M., & Lievens, F. (2018). Employer branding: A brand equity-based literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 155–179. http://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12121
Koenig, H. G., Youssef, N. A., Ames, D., Oliver, J. P., Teng, E. J., Haynes, K., … Pearce, M. (2018). Moral injury and religiosity in US veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(5), 325–331. http://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000798

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.