INTEGRATION OF DIGITAL MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE EFFICIENCY OF ENTERPRISES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
In this study, we examine the integration of digital management and resource efficiency within the framework of sustainable development and the concept of natural resource efficiency (NRE). We analyze how enterprises can move from fragmented management practices toward integrated, data-driven systems that simultaneously increase productivity and reduce environmental pressure. We argue that digital transformation should not be treated as a purely technological shift but as a structural reconfiguration of managerial models that embeds sustainability into operational decision-making. We systematize the core characteristics of digital management, including process digitalization, the creation of new value propositions, and the development of digital partnerships. We evaluate modern approaches to measuring resource efficiency, such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), benchmarking, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Carbon Footprint Analysis. We demonstrate how enterprises can combine these methods with digital twins and artificial intelligence tools to construct a real-time monitoring and adaptive management system. We show that digital twins enable continuous data collection and process modeling, DEA and benchmarking provide quantitative efficiency diagnostics, and AI algorithms generate dynamic optimization scenarios. Unlike existing studies that consider digital transformation and resource efficiency separately, this article proposes for the first time an integrated three-level model that combines digital twins (for monitoring and modeling processes), DEA and benchmarking (for quantitative performance assessment), and artificial intelligence (for dynamic adjustment of management decisions). We find that this integrated architecture strengthens operational resilience, reduces waste, optimizes energy consumption, and improves ESG indicators. We illustrate the practical applicability of the model through the case of a large telecommunications enterprise operating under conditions of infrastructural risk and rapid digital expansion. We also identify the rebound effect as a critical risk, arguing that enterprises must monitor behavioral responses alongside technical indicators to avoid offsetting environmental gains. We conclude that enterprises need to develop rational models for integrating digital management platforms with AI-based resource efficiency assessment tools in order to minimize waste, reduce costs, and strengthen the synergy between digital transformation and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it
Aklilu, A., Dussaux, D., & Verrier, A. (2025). Quantifying digital innovation for the twin transition: Historical trends, current landscape and links with environmental innovation. OECD Environment Working Papers, 261. https://doi.org/10.1787/8cc4cff0-en
Calvino, F., Dechezleprêtre, A., & Haerle, D. (2025). How can the digital transformation affect the net-zero transition?: A conceptual framework for the "twin" transition. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2025/17. https://doi.org/10.1787/4ee71f6d-en
Ben Youssef, A. (2025). Twin transition: Digital transformation pathways for sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219491
Schallmo, D., Kolb, J., Schuster, T., Athanassopoulou, N., & Sepetis, A. (2025). Twin transformation: Understanding the nature and combination of digital and sustainability transformation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 29(5–6), 2501001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919625010017
Chen, H. (2025). How digital transformation impacts corporate green innovation? arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.16260. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.16260
Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., & Del Giudice, M. (2018). The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.002
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore. 2020.120420
Iranshahi, K., Brun, J., Arnold, T., Sergi, T., & Müller, U. C. (2025). Digital twins: Recent advances and future directions in engineering fields. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 26, 200516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200516
Zhang, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Economic growth vs environmental sustainability: Examining resource extraction in the world’s largest economies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1586619
Holushko, D. (2025). Digital transformation of enterprise management: global trends and Ukrainian practice. Economy and Society, (79). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-79-102 (in Ukrainian)
Bobro, N., Lisova, R., Parfentieva, O., Dmytrovska, V., & Kyrylenko, S. (2025). Digital Transformation for Cost Optimisation and Sustainable Business Operations European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n2p158
Buiak, L. A. (2024). Modern trends and main theoretical approaches to the digital transformation of agribusiness. Journal of Strategic Economic Research, (6), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.30857/2786-5398.2023.6.5 (in Ukrainian)
Rybak, I., & Garafonova, O. (2025). Digital transformation as a tool for improving the management of strategic enterprise development. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 5(346), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-12 (in Ukrainian)
Shashyna, M., & Kocherga, O. (2024). Efficiency of enterprise resource potential utilization under conditions of digitalization. Economic Synergy, 2, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.53920/ES-2024-2-3 (in Ukrainian)
Koronakos, G., Dula, J. H., & Despotis, D. K. (2024). Competing DEA procedures: Analysis, testing, and comparisons (arXiv:2407.15585 [math.OC]). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.15585
Wang, Z., & Zelenyuk, V. (2024). Data envelopment analysis: From foundations to modern advancements. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 13(3), 170–282. https://doi.org/10.1561/0800000040
Shapa, N., Ufimtseva, O., Skrypnyk, N., Zamlynskyi, V., & Reznik, N. (2025). Exploring employee perceptions of organizational changes and approaches to measuring motivation levels. In Big Data in Finance: Transforming the Financial Landscape (pp. 397–411). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75095-3_32

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.