THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES FOR THE FORMATION OF SOCIAL COHESION IN COMMUNITIES
Abstract
The relevance of this study stems from the need to analyze the processes of social cohesion within territorial communities, which play a crucial role in ensuring the stable development of a state, particularly during geopolitical crises, economic transformations, and social changes. The interaction among citizens, the level of trust, and the effectiveness of public governance directly influence a community’s ability to function independently, address local challenges, and achieve social harmony. This article examines the key factors that shape social cohesion and the mechanisms that support it at various levels of governance.
The study identifies social capital, institutional support, and civic engagement as primary determinants of social cohesion in territorial communities. The stability of social ties within a community, along with their vertical and horizontal organization, plays a decisive role in the effective management of resources and the resolution of social challenges. The fundamental components of social cohesion include trust between citizens and local self-government bodies, shared values and identity, and participation in decision-making.
Institutional initiatives aimed at fostering active civic engagement and collective initiatives significantly influence the level of social cohesion. Social services and access to essential resources emerge as key factors in ensuring equal opportunities for all community members.
The findings suggest that social cohesion represents a dynamic process requiring continuous support from governmental authorities and active participation from citizens. Strengthening this process depends on the development of social ties, increasing trust between communities and governing bodies, and ensuring inclusivity and access to resources. Future research should explore mechanisms for reducing social barriers, fostering intergroup interactions, and promoting collective responsibility within communities.
Downloads
References
Aruqaj, B. (2023). An integrated approach to the conceptualisation and measurement of social cohesion. Social Indicators Research, 168, 227‒263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03110-z
Bales, R. F. (1951). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, Mass., Addison-Wesley Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/interactionproce00bale
Biloskurskyi, О., & Zurabashvili, Т. Dr. (2024). Social cohesion in Ukraine. USAID project & SeeD. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/publications/sotsialna-zhurtovanist-v-ukrayini-tendentsiyi-za-danymy-doslidzhennya-rescore-2024
Dash, S. P., & Thilagam, N. L. (2023). "Creative placemaking": a conceptual model fostering social cohesion in community spaces within residential environments. Creativity Studies, 16(2), 541‒564. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.16497
Deineko, O. (2023). Ukraine, war and resistance: reshaping social cohesion. Studia Socjologiczne, 2(249), 155‒177. doi: https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.146173
Delhey, J., Dragolov, G., & Boehnke, K. (2023). Social cohesion in international comparison: a review of key measures and findings. Köln Z Soziol., 75(1), 95‒120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-023-00891-6
Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2018). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32, 231‒253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
Ganushchak T., Sova O., Oviechkina O., & Olasiuk H. (2024). Next-generation innovation: food security modeling for positive social effects. E3S Web of Conferences Journal, 558, 01027. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455801027
Ham, S., & Woolcock, G. (2022). "Who do they think they are?": social identity & conflict in small rural community. Rural Society, 31(1), 33–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2022.2061723
Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion. Commonwealth Secretariat and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/151856/Jenson%20ebook.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Lalot, F., Abrams, D., Broadwood, J., & et al. (2022). The social cohesion investment: Communities that invested in integration programmes are showing greater social cohesion in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 536‒554. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2522
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers / Ed. by Dorwin Cartwright. Harpers. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.503983
Moustakas, L. (2023). Social cohesion: definitions, causes and consequences. Encyclopedia, 3, 1028‒1037. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030075
Orazani, N., Cárdenas, D., Reynolds, K. J., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2023). Editorial: "Divided or united": strengthening social cohesion for well-being and prosperity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1278832. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278832
Orazani, N., Reynolds, K. J., & Osborne, H. (2023). What works and why in interventions to strengthen social cohesion: a systematic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(10), 938‒995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12990
Schiefer, D., & Van der Noll, J. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: a literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579‒603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
Sova, O., Bieliaieva, N., Antypenko, N., & Drozd, N. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence and digital HRM on the resource consumption within sustainable development perspective. E3S Web of Conferences Journal, 408, 01006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340801006
White, F. A., Borinca, I., Vezzali, L., & et al. (2021). Beyond direct contact: the theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 77, 132‒153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12400
Zahnow, R. (2024). Social infrastructure, social cohesion and subjective wellbeing. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 7, 100210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2024.100210
Economic principles of promoting community cohesion. [Khymynets, V., Holovka, А., Zhalilo, Ya. & et al.]. (2022). Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.53679/NISS-analytrep.2022.08 (in Ukrainian)
Zaiats, T., Romaniuk, S., Kraievska, H., & et al. (2024). Priority areas for the formation of capable territorial communities in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 10(1), 135–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2024.10.01.06 (in Ukrainian)
Libanova, E., & Romaniuk, S. (2023). Conceptualization of governance in social relations. Demography and Social Economy, 3, 33–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2023.03.033 (in Ukrainian)
Liakh, T., Spirina, T., & Kovtun, Ye. (2023). Development of social cohesion in the territorial community. Humanitas, 3, 53–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2023.3.7 (in Ukrainian)
Palatna, D., & Semyhina, T. (2024). Community cohesion: social dimension. Tallinn: Teadmus. doi: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25927504.v1 (in Ukrainian)
Tkachuk, A., Bilyi, B., & Lapin, Ye. (2024). Methodological recommendations for studying cohesion in the territorial community and preparing measures for its improvement. Institute of Civil Society. Retrieved from https://www.csi.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/proekt-metodrekomend28042024_got.pdf (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
