DIGITIZING UKRAINIAN REAL ESTATE: ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF TOKENIZATION
Abstract
We examine how fractional ownership of real estate, facilitated by digital tokens, may broaden access to property investment in Ukraine and streamline financing for reconstruction. We evaluate international precedents where blockchain protocols divide large assets into smaller units, reducing traditional capital thresholds. This approach, we find, could spur broader participation and lessen financing bottlenecks in Ukraine’s property market. Our analysis highlights that digital tokens, when linked to real estate through special-purpose vehicles, can create a more fluid environment for buying and selling fractional shares, with the potential to enhance transparency and reduce administrative overhead.
We observe that the current legal framework in Ukraine recognizes real estate rights primarily through a centralized register, rendering blockchain-based tokens an unacknowledged form of evidence of a title. Nonetheless, we propose that innovative structures, including foreign-registered entities holding Ukrainian property, might resolve such complications. We argue that such tokenized offerings could meet post-war demand for real estate finance and contribute to broader economic rejuvenation.
We also evaluate various growth scenarios for Ukraine’s share of the European tokenized property market. Under a cautious trajectory, Ukraine might capture 2% of Europe’s projected tokenized real estate volume by 2034; under more optimistic conditions, this share could reach 5%. Our estimates suggest this translates to USD 168–420 million in market value, representing around 0.06–0.15% of Ukraine’s possible GDP in that timeframe. We identify fractional ownership as a key mechanism for lowering barriers, while the potential to trade tokens across global platforms could generate broader foreign investor interest.
We find that tokenized real estate, if governed by smart contracts, might lower transaction costs and facilitate automated compliance procedures. We further identify advantages related to faster price discovery, since daily digital trading can capture a wider spectrum of market signals. Despite these benefits, we note that high trading velocity poses a risk of volatility, which could deter conservative investors and undermine the longer-term goals of stable financing for redevelopment. Speculative pressures might also drive property values up too quickly, distorting local housing markets.
Finally, we conclude that successful adoption of tokenized real estate in Ukraine depends on regulations that clarify ownership rights, ensure investor safeguards, and resolve cross-border legal complexities. Through the alignment of legal and technical infrastructures, real estate tokenization may evolve into a viable funding channel, supporting both economic modernization and post-conflict recovery in Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Riabokin, M., & Kotukh, Y. (2024). Real‑world asset (RWA) tokenization as a financial innovation capable of attracting investment to Ukraine’s post‑war economy. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(11), 64–77. Retrieved from https://gsarpublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GSARJEBM2192024-Gelary-script.pdf
Obushnyi, S., Virovets, D., Zhytar, M., & Zhdanova, Y. (2024). Unlocking the economic potential of real-estate tokenization in Ukraine. In DECaT’2024 – Digital Economy Concepts and Technologies (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3665, pp. 79–87). CEUR-WS.org. Retrieved from https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/48772/1/S_Obushnyi_D_Virovets_M_Zhytar_Y_%20Zhdanova_DECaT2024_3665.pdf
Belinska, Y., Onyshko, S., & Dyuk, R. (2023). Tokenization of financial assets as an innovative direction of financial market development. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, “Economics” Series, 30(58), 22–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2023-30(58)-22-29 (in Ukrainian)
Sarmah, S. S. (2018). Understanding blockchain technology. Computer Science and Engineering, 8(2), 23–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.computer.20180802.02
Makaliuk, I., Falko, A., & Zakharov, V. (2023). Tokenization of securities as a means to enhance liquidity and attract investment in Ukraine’s post‑war recovery. Efficient Economy, (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2023.1.34 (in Ukrainian)
Wang, S. T. (2024). Examine the benefits and challenges in the adoption of blockchain technology and real-world asset tokenization to SME financing (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5111710
Kreppmeier, J., Laschinger, R., Steininger, B. I., & Dorfleitner, G. (2023). Real estate security token offerings and the secondary market: Driven by crypto hype or fundamentals? Journal of Banking & Finance, 154, 106940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106940
Tanveer, U., Ishaq, S., & Hoang, T. G. (2025). Tokenized assets in a decentralized economy: Balancing efficiency, value, and risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 282, 109554. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109554
Steininger, B. I. (2023). Return–risk analysis of real estate tokens: An asset class of its own. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 49(10), 83–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2023.1.540
Aharon, D. Y., Ali, S., & Brahim, M. (2024). Connectedness at extremes between real‑estate tokens and real‑estate stocks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103425
Abdullah, M., Adeabah, D., Abakah, E. J. A., & Lee, C.‑C. (2023). Extreme return and volatility connectedness among real‑estate tokens, REITs and other assets: The role of global factors and portfolio implications. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104062. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104062
Yousaf, I., Assaf, A., & Demir, E. (2024). Relationship between real‑estate tokens and other asset classes: Evidence from a quantile connectedness approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102238
Saari, A., Vimpari, J., & Junnila, S. (2022). Blockchain in real estate: Recent developments and empirical applications. Land Use Policy, 121, 106334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106334
Lauslahti, K., Mattila, J., & Seppälä, T. (2017). Smart contracts – How will blockchain technology affect contractual practices? ETLA Reports, 68, 1–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154043
Boggio Viola, A. (2024). The tokenization of assets: Analysing the emergence of a new market trend (Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Master’s Degree in Management Engineering). Retrieved from https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/32684/
Swinkels, L. (2023). Empirical evidence on the ownership and liquidity of real‑estate tokens. Financial Innovation, 9, Article 45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00427-5
Baltais, M., & Sondore, E. (2024). Economic impact potential of real‑world asset tokenization (Working paper, 36 pp.). Stockholm School of Economics in Riga. Retrieved from https://www.makroekonomika.lv/sites/default/files/2024-06/06_Baltais%20%26%20Sondore.pdf
Koç, S. (2024, December 3). Upon – Web3 innovation for real world virtual office asset (Version 1) [Preprint]. doi: https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.173324121.17569745/v1
Smith, R., & Baur, D. G. (2024, November). Real‑estate tokenisation: Benefits, limitations and market dynamics (SSRN Working Paper No. 5083787). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5083787
Avci, G., & Erzurumlu, Y. O. (2023). Blockchain tokenization of real‑estate investment: A security‑token offering procedure and legal‑design proposal. Journal of Property Research, 40(2), 188–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2023.2167665
Baum, A. (2021). Tokenization — The future of real‑estate investment? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(10), 41–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.260
Gogol, K., Killer, C., Schlosser, M., Bocek, T., Stiller, B., & Tessone, C. (2024). SoK: Decentralized finance (DeFi) – Fundamentals, taxonomy and risks. arXiv:2404.11281 [cs.CR]. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.11281
Chen, S., Jiang, M., & Luo, X. (2024, October). Exploring the security issues of real‑world assets (RWA). In Proceedings of the Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security (DeFi ’24) (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3689931.3694913
Liu, L., Zhou, S., Huang, H., & Zheng, Z. (2021). From technology to society: An overview of blockchain-based DAO. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 2, 204–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2021.3072661
Ali, S., Yechiam‑Aharon, D., & Brahim, M. (2024). The digitalisation of the real‑estate market: New evidence from the token economy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103610
Schueffel, P. (2021). DeFi: Decentralized finance – An introduction and overview. Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), I–XI. doi: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.003_0001
Thibault, L. T., Sarry, T., & Senhaji Hafid, A. (2022). Blockchain scaling using rollups: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 10, 93039–93054. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3200051
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
