Estimation of methods for calculating the phase shift of wave fronts of own modes of a confocal resonator

Keywords: reproduction of a unit of length, irregularity of in-phase surfaces, topological phase

Abstract

Background: The redefinition of a unit of length - a meter - through a unit of time and a fundamental constant - the speed of light in vacuum - has opened up the fundamental possibility of a significant reduction in the uncertainty of its reproduction. Now progress in areas such as absolute ballistic gravimetry, control of large-sized aspherical optics, laser interferometry, and the production of electronic components in the semiconductor industry have made this feature extremely relevant. It is known that the measuring scale of laser interferometers used for precision distance measurement is non-linear, since the common-mode surfaces of any real radiation beam are located irregularly in space. To compensate for the effect of this irregularity on the measurement result, it is necessary to know the precision phase structure of real laser beams.

Objectives of the work is comparing existing methods for studying the phase structure of optical radiation beams and estimating the distribution of the topological phase shift of a relatively uniform plane wave.

Materials and methods:. The well-known theoretical methods for calculating the topological phase shift of in-phase surfaces of an optical beam are considered and compared - the Lommel-Debye method based on the Fresnel-Kirchhoff integral, the modified method based on the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral and the Gaussian beam method based on a parabolic equation.

Results: Each method performed calculations of the accumulated phase lag of the focused radiation beam when moving the observation plane relative to the focal point. The distribution of the relative change in the distance between the in-phase surfaces in the range of displacements from λ to 106•λ was also calculated. The most adequate physical picture of the phenomenon was obtained by the Gaussian beam method based on a parabolic equation.

Conclusion: The results will be used to reduce the systematic error of laser interferometers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

K. I. Muntean, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Svobody Square, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Documents Concerning the New Definition of the Metre. Metrologia.1984;19(4);163-16.

Ma L-S, Bi Z, Bartels A, Robertsson L, Zucco M, Windeler RS, Wilpers G, et al. Optical frequency synthesis and comparison with uncertainty at the 10-19 level. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1843-3.

Zaharenko YuG, Kononova NA, Lejbengardt GI, Chekirda KV. Tridtsatimetrovyj lazernyj interferentsionnyj komparator vhodyaschij v sostav gosudarstvennogo pervichnogo etalona edinitsy dliny - metra - izmeritelnaya tehnika. 2012;(5):22-5.

Vitushkin LF, Orlov OA, Dzhermak A, D’agostino G. Lazernyie interferometryi peremescheniy s subnanometrovyim razresheniem v absolyutnyih ballisticheskih gravimetrah. Izmeritelnaya tehnika. 2012;(3):3-6.

Lawall J, Kessler E. Michelson interferometry with 10 pm accuracy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2000;71(7):2669-8.

Dubrov MN, Alyoshin VA. Precise laser interferometry with 1 pm resolution. Zhurnal radioelektroniki. 2004;(5): Avaible at: http://jre.cplire.ru/alt/may04/1/text.html.

ITRS – International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. 2003: http://public.itrs.net

Gouy LG. Sur une propriété nouvelle des ondes lumineuses, CR Hebdomadaires Séances Acad. Sci. 1890;(110):1251-3.

Berry MV. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 1984 Mar 8;A392(1802);45-13.

Boyd RW. Intuitive explanation of the phase anomaly of focused light beams. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1980 Jul;70(7):877-4.

Siegman AE. Lasers. Mill Hill: University Science Books; 1986.

Simon R, Mukunda N. Bargmann invariant and the geometry of the Güoy effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993 Feb 15;70(7):880-4.

Subbarao D. Topological phase in Gaussian beam optics. Opt. Lett. 1995;20(21):2162-3.

Hariharan P, Robinson PA. The Gouy phase shift as a geometrical quantum effect. J. Mod. Optics.1996;43(2):219-3.

Feng S, Winful HG. Physical origin of the Gouy phase shift. Opt. Lett. 2001;26(8):485-3.

Visser TD, Wolf E. The origin of the Gouy phase anomaly and its generalization to astigmatic wavefields. Opt. Commun. 2010;(283):3371-5.

Born M, Volf E. Osnovy optiki. Per. s angl. M.; Nauka: 1970. 856 s.

Vatson GN. Teoriya besselevyh funktsij. Ch I. Per. s angl. M.; Izd. inostr. lit. 1949; 798 s.

Mahajan VN. Uniform versus Gaussian beams: a comparison of the effects of diffraction, obscuration and aberrations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1986;A3(4):470-6.

Pang X, Fischer DG, Visser TD. Wavefront spacing and Gouy phase in presence of primary spherical aberration. Opt. Lett. 2014 Jan 1;39(1):88-4.

Smirnov SA. Svojstva sfokusirovannyh opticheskih puchkov. SPb. NIU ITMO. 2012; 123 s.

Kogelnik H, Li T. Laser Beams and Resonators. Proc. of the IEEE. 1966 Oct;54(10):1312-18.

Published
2019-12-26
Cited
How to Cite
Muntean, K. I. (2019). Estimation of methods for calculating the phase shift of wave fronts of own modes of a confocal resonator. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series “Radio Physics and Electronics”, (31), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.26565/2311-0872-2019-31-08