Questionnaire For Diagnosing the Emotional Component of Essential Self-Regulation (QDES-2-E) and its Interpretation

Keywords: self-regulation, essential self-regulation, affect, ambivalence, apathy, optimum, emotional regulation, integrity, authenticity, self-actualization

Abstract

The article presents the author-developed psychodiagnostic method – “Questionnaire for Diagnosing the Emotional Component of Essential Self-Regulation (QDES-2-E)”, designed to study the emotional dimension of essential self-regulation in personality. The concept of essential self-regulation is understood as an individual's ability to realize their inherent tendency toward self-actualization, maintain authenticity, inner coherence, and a sense of meaning in various life circumstances, relying not only on functional control mechanisms but primarily on the connection with personal values, deep needs, and essential identity. This approach is relevant in the context of studying personal growth, self-realization, overcoming existential crises, and preserving psychological well-being. The method allows the exploration of four types of emotional states: affect (intense, often impulsive arousal), ambivalence (emotional contradiction, inner conflict), optimum (a state of balance, harmony, integration), and apathy (lack of emotional involvement, detachment). Each of these modes is assessed across three key areas of functioning: general (existential), professional, and family. The test consists of 6 situational blocks that simulate typical life challenges; each block contains 8 response options. Respondents select from 3 to 5 options that best reflect their emotional reactions. This format allows for the registration of the multidimensionality of emotional experience and the identification of an individual self-regulation profile. The method is applicable in scientific research, psychotherapeutic and counseling practice, educational settings, and psychological support of personal development. The article presents the theoretical foundations of the method, its structure, scale design principles, logic of result interpretation, and practical applications for identifying personal strengths, vulnerabilities, and the potential for emotional integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dmytrienko, К. (2012). Self-regulation of the behavior of convicts prone to systematic violations of the detention regime in places of deprivation of liberty [Text]: autoref. theses of the candidate of psychological sciences: Khark. National University of Internal Affairs. - Х. - 18 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kocharian, I. (2017). The system of joy: essential self-regulation of the psyche and its psychological correction: monograph / I. Kocharyan. - 2nd ed., ed. -H.: V.N. Karazin KHNU]. – 288 p.

Johnson, M. K., & Casey, B. J. (2022). Self-regulation in early childhood: Neural and cognitive mechanisms. Child Development Perspectives, 16(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12465

Dunne, J., Van Cappellen, P., & Reddy, S. (2021). Interoception and the development of emotion regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.06.006

Montroy, J. J., Bowles, R. P., Skibbe, L. E., McClelland, M. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2016). The development of self-regulation across early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1744–1762. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000159

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

Rieth, C. A., & Hagemann, D. (2021). Adaptive affect regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 71, 101655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101655

Cole, P. M., Bendezú, J. J., Ram, N., & Chow, S. M. (2017). Dynamical systems modeling of early childhood self-regulation. Emotion, 17(4), 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000272

Lobo, J. M., & Lunkenheimer, E. S. (2020). Emotion regulation in the context of parent–child interaction. Development and Psychopathology, 32(5), 1754–1765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001259

Lopez, R. B., Hofmann, S. G., Wagner, D. D., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2017). Neural predictors of regulation failure. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw131

Nakagawa, Y. (2017). Emotion regulation and decision-making under uncertainty. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88(5), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.88.16218

Kocharian, I., & Servinskiy, V. (2019). Diagnostic questionnaire of essential self-regulation and psychometric assessment of its tasks, Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda KhnPU. Psychology. Vol. 60. Kharkiv: KhNPU], 2019. – p. 209 – 230. (in Ukrainian).

Kocharian, I. O. (2023). Psykholohichne konsulʹtuvannya i psykhoterapiya, (19), 6–20. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/psychotherapy/article/view/22241/20577 (in Ukrainian)

Kocharian, I., & Kuznetsova, D. (2024). Emotional component of essential self-regulation related to women's marital satisfaction]. Psychological Counseling and Psychotherapy, (21), 18–24. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/psychotherapy/issue/view/1429/1927 (in Ukrainian)

Published
2025-06-30
Cited
How to Cite
Kocharian, I. (2025). Questionnaire For Diagnosing the Emotional Component of Essential Self-Regulation (QDES-2-E) and its Interpretation. Psychological Counseling and Psychotherapy, (23), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-1249-2025-23-06
Section
MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES