The theoretical foundations of the personal component of individual experience research

  • Павло Олександрович Севост`янов The Applied Psychology Department, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-9920
Keywords: individual experience, personal component of individual experience, the Self-concept, self-regulation, self-assessment, life meaningful orientations, values, Big Five

Abstract

The article contains a theoretical analysis of the personal component of individual experience, namely, its components, which most fully describe the features of its organization, are singled out. The analysis was based on the A.N. Laktionov individual experience concept, suggesting the presence of personal, social and mnemic components. During the consideration of the personal component, its analysis was made in three aspects: the interpretation of oneself, the interpretation of others, and the interpretation of the surrounding world. The components of the personal component of individual experience are meaningfully defined: in the aspect of self-interpretation, self-esteem, self-regulation and the Self-concept; in the aspect of interpreting others, the values and the Self-concept; in the aspect of the interpretation of the world - values and lifemeaning orientations. Each of the components separately considered in the framework of various concepts. As a result, a separate attention was paid to the theory: self-regulation by V. Morosanova; the meaning of the life of V. Frankl, supplemented by D. Leontiev; the Self-concept of V. Stolin and the values of S. Schwartz and W. Bilski. The concept of the the Self-concept was also proposed as a generalization of ideas about one’s own well-being as a representative characteristic of the personal component of individual experience, which was introduced due to the need to embrace the problem of dispersal of experience over time. Personal theories for their compliance with the characteristics of the study of personal experience, including both domestic and foreign, are considered. Facts are given that indicate that the integration of the concepts of Aysenck, Allport and Cattell could create one of the most relevant conceptual foundations for the study of personal experience. It was concluded that the most appropriate holistic theory, within which the personal component of individual experience can be investigated, is the theory of the Big Five, which, while fully describing the personality as a whole, makes a separate emphasis on the attitude of the person to his own experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler A. O nervicheskom haraktere. / A. Adler. Spb., 1997. 388 s. [in Russian].

Ananev B. G. Psihologicheskaya struktura cheloveka kak sub’ekta. / Ananev B. G. // Chelovek i obschestvo. Vyip. 2. L.: LGU. 1967. – S. 235–249. [in Russian].

Ayzenk G., Ayzenk M. Issledovaniya chelovecheskoy psihiki. / G. Ayzenk, M. Ayzenk. – M.: Izd-vo EKSMO-press, 2001. – 480 s. [in Russian].

Basov M.Ya. Volya kak predmet funktsionalnoy psihologii / M.Ya. Basov. // Voprosyi izucheniya i vospitaniya lichnosti, 1922, № 4-5. [in Russian].

Berdyaev N.A. Ya i mir ob’ektov / N.A. Berdyaev. Filosofiya svobodnogo duha. - M.: Respublika, 1994. [in Russian].

Berns R. Chto takoe Ya - kontseptsiya / R. Berns // Psihologiya samosoznaniya: Hrest. / Red. D.Ya. Raygorodskiy. - Samara: Bahrah-M, 2003. - S.333-393. [in Russian].

Cattell R. B. Description and measurement of personality. / R. Cattell San Francisco, 1946.

Dikaya L.G. Psihologiya samoregulyatsii funktsionalnogo sostoyaniya sub’ekta v ekstremalnyih usloviyah deyatelnosti: dis. ... d-ra psihol. nauk : 19.00.03 / L.G.Dikaya. — M., 2002. — 342 s. [in Russian].

Dzhems U. Pragmatizm: Novoe nazvanie dlya nekotoryih staryih metodov myishleniya: Per. s angl. – SPb.: Shipovnik, 1910. – 242 s. [in Russian].

Elkonin D. B. Izbrannyie psihologicheskie trudyi / D.B. Elkonin. M: Pedagogika. 1989. 560 s. [in Russian].

Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskah smyisla: Sbornik: / Obsch. red. L.Ya. Gozmana. - M.: Progress, 1990. - 368 s. [in Russian].

Freyd Z. Psihika: struktura i funktsionirovanie; per. s nem. A.M. Bokovikov. – M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2007. – 230 s. [in Russian].

Fromm E. Imet ili byit/per. s nem. E. Telyatnikovoy - M.;AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. [in Russian].

Ganzen V. A. Sistematizatsiya psihicheskih sostoyaniy // Psihologiya sostoyaniy: hrestomatiya / sost. T. N. Vasileva, G. Sh. Gabdreeva, A. O. Prohorov / pod. red. A. O. Prohorova. - M.: PER SE; SPb.: Rech, 2004. - S. 60-64. [in Russian].

Goldberg, L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. / R. Goldberg, Psychological Assessment, 1992. 4(1), 26-42.

Horni K. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 1: Psihologiya zhenschinyi. Nevroticheskaya lichnost nashego vremeni / K. Horni. – M.: Smyisl, 1997 – 496 s. [in Russian].

Kon I.S. V poiskah sebya: Lichnost i ee samosoznanie. / I.S. Kon - M.: Politizdat, 1984.- 335 s. [in Russian].

Kryazh I. V. Sotsialnoe vremya v predstavleniyah zhiteley vostochnoy i zapadnoy Ukrainyi. / I.V. Kryazh. VIsnik HarkIvskogo natsIonalnogo unIversitetu ImenI V. N. KarazIna. SerIya psihologIya, 2007. 771, 137-145. [in Russian].

Kuli Ch. Pervichnyie gruppyi / Ch. kuli // Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya myisl: Tekstyi. – M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1994. – S.330-334. [in Russian].

Laktionov A. N. Koordinatyi individualnogo opyita / A.N. Laktionov. Harkov: Biznes-Inform, 1998. – 492 s. [in Russian].

LaktIonov, O.M. Strukturno-dinamIchna organIzatsIya IndivIdualnogo dosvIdu. dis. ... doktora psihologIchnih nauk: 19.00.01. K. - 2000. - 374 s. [in Russian].

Leontev A. N. Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost / A.N. Leontev. Moskva, Smyisl: Akademiya. 2004. 352 s. [in Russian].

Leontev D. A. Psihologiya smyisla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyislovoy realnosti / D.A. Leontev. 2-e, ispr. izd. M.: Smyisl. 2003. 488 s. [in Russian].

Levin K. Dinamicheskaya psihologiya: Izbrannyie trudyi / Pod obsch. red. D. A. Leonteva i E. Yu. Patyaevoy; [sost., per. s nem. i angl. yaz. i nauch. red. D. A. Deonteva, E. Yu. Patyaevoy]. - M.: Smyisl, 2001. - 576 s. [in Russian].

Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost / A. Maslou. 3-e izd. Per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2008, - 352 s. [in Russian].

Mid Dzh. Az i Ya // Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya myisl. Tekstyi / Per. s angl. pod red. Dobrenkova. M.: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1994. S. 227- 237. [in Russian].

Momov, V. Chelovek, moral, vospitanie [Tekst] / V. Momov.–M.: Progress, 1975.-166s. [in Russian].

Morosanova V.I. Lichnostnyie aspektyi samoregulyatsii proizvolnoy aktivnosti cheloveka / V.I. Morosanova // Psihol. zhurn. 2002. T. 23. № 6. S. 5-17. [in Russian].

Muhina V.S. Fenomenologiya razvitiya i byitiya lichnosti / V.S. Muhina. - M.-Voronezh, 1999. [in Russian].

Norman, W. T. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. / W. Norman.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963. 66(6), 574-583.

Olport G. Stanovlenie: osnovnyie polozheniya psihologii lichnosti. Stanovlenie lichnosti. Izbrannyie trudyi / G. Olport. M.: Smyisl., 2002. S. 166-216. [in Russian].

Ozhiganova G.V. Vyisshaya sposobnost k samoregulyatsii i vnutrenniy opyit / G.V. Ozhiganova // Privolzhskiy nauchnyiy vestnik. 2014. №11-2 (39). [in Russian].

Rean, A. A. Psihologiya izucheniya lichnosti / A.A. Rean. - M.: Izdatelstvo Mihaylova V. A., 1999. - 288 c. [in Russian].

Rodzhers K. R. Stanovlenie lichnostyu. Vzglyad na psihoterapiyu / K.R. rodzhers. Eksmo-Press. 2001. 672 s. [in Russian].

Rokich M. Priroda chelovecheskih tsennostey / M. Rokich // Svobodnaya pressa, 1973, №5. S. 2028. [in Russian].

Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovyi obschey psihologii / S.L. Rubinshteyn. Izdatelstvo Piter. 2002. 720 s. [in Russian].

Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. / S. Schwartz, W. Bilsky. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53, 550-562

Sevostianov, P. Openness to Experience and Behavior Self-Regulation in the Structure of the Personal Component of Individual Experience. / P. Sevostianov. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Психологія». 2018. №65. С. 42-45.

Sevostianov, P. The Self-Concept In the Personal Component of Individual Experience Structure./ P. Sevostianov. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Психологія». 2018. №64. С. 51-55.

Sevostyanov P.A. Vzaimootnoshenie tsennostnyih orientatsiy i otkryitosti opyitu u studentov / P.A. Sevostyanov. VIsnik HarkIvskogo natsIonalnogo unIversitetu ImenI V. N. KarazIna. SerIya «PsihologIya». 2011. №45. S. 259-261. [in Russian].

Sevostianov P.O. Vzaiemozviazok vidkrytosti dosvidu ta smyslozhyttievykh oriientatsii u studentiv. / P.O. Sevostianov. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Psykholohiia». 2018. №63. S. 12-16. [in Ukrainian].

Shpranger E. Osnovnyie idealnyie tipyi individualnosti // Psihologiya lichnosti: tekstyi / pod red. Yu. B. Gippenreyter, A. A. Puzyireya. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1982. - 287 s. - s. 55-59. [in Russian].

Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti / V.V. Stolin. – M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983. – 288 s. [in Russian].

Tugarinov, V.P. Filosofiya soznaniya / V.P. Tugarinov. - M.: Gostehizdat, 1998. - 198 c. [in Russian].

Voschinin A. V. Refleksivnaya regulyatsiya psihicheskih sostoyaniy sportsmenov / A. Voschinin // Uchenyie zapiski universiteta Lesgafta. 2016. №6 (136). [in Russian].

Vyigotskiy L.S. Voprosyi teorii i istorii psihologii / L. Vyigotskiy // Sobr. soch. v 6 t. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – T.1. – 487 s. [in Russian].

Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. / R. Wicklund, J. Brehm. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.

Yakobson S. G. Psihologicheskie problemyi eticheskogo razvitiya detey / S.G. Yakobson. M., 1984. [in Russian].

Yung K. Tevistokskie lektsii / K. Yung. M., 1998. 295 s. [in Russian].

Published
2019-07-17
Cited
How to Cite
Севост`яновП. О. (2019). The theoretical foundations of the personal component of individual experience research. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, (66), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2019-66-04