The Role of the Ecological Worldview Position in Coping with Problems Caused by Global Environmental Change

Keywords: ecological worldview position, attitudes, stress, environmental stress, biospheric and monetary meaning

Abstract

The purpose of the study, conducted on the sample of 293 persons, was to identify the role of the ecological worldview position in choosing the ways of coping with problems caused by global environmental change. The ecological worldview position is determined by what exactly is perceived and considered by the person as the basics of his life support: the biosphere/ecological systems or the financial and economic system, represented through commodity and money relations. Using structural equation modeling methods, the influence of the ecological position on the choice of coping strategies as responses to environmental stress was confirmed, as well as its involvement in the regulation of pro-ecological everyday behavior. It was revealed that the ecological worldview position influences the choice of both problem-oriented and emotionally-oriented strategies that allow coping with stressful environmental conditions. The way in which the ecological position influences coping strategies depends on what meanings are decisive in the perception of ecological reality. The dominance of biocentric views promotes the pro-environmental orientation of behavior, while the predominance of monetary and economic meanings enhances non-problem coping. At the same time, the positive influence of the ecological position on problem-focused coping is largely carried out indirectly through the inhibition of deproblematization-focused coping – emotionally oriented coping strategies such as reducing problems and the denial of guilt. The decisive influence of the ecological position on pro-ecological everyday behavior is carried out indirectly – through the strategy of problem solving (positive influence), as well as the strategy of de-emphasizing the threat (negative influence). The direct influence of the ecological position on behavior, as well as an influence exerted indirectly through the denial of guilt is very weak. The negative impact of deproblematization-focused coping on everyday behavior is mediated by the suppression of problem coping.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Список посилань

Абабков, В.А. Перре, M.. (2004) Адаптация к стрессу. СПб.: Речь. http://www.socium.kiev.ua/pdf/grupova%20robota_treningovi%20rozrobky/Adaptatsiya%20k%20stressu.pdf

Баева, К.О. (2017) Копинг-стратегий личности как ресурсы совладания с экологическими угрозами. «Вектори психології - 2017». Матеріали міжнародної молодіжної конференції. Харків, 63-66.

Баєва, К.О. (2019) Роль екологічної позиції в визначенні спрямованості екологічної активності і оцінки справедливості взаємодії. Збірник наукових праць «Теорія і практика сучасної психології», 2(1), 17-23. http://www.tpsp-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/2_2019/part_1/5.pdf

Барковская, А.Ю., Назарова, М.П. (2014) Стресс-факторы в социокультурном пространстве современного большого города. Primo Aspectu, 5(16), 37–42. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21976159

Бодров, В.А. (2006) Психологический стресс: развитие и преодоление. М.: Пер Сэ. https://www.twirpx.com/file/473234/

Василенко, Е.А. (2015) К вопросу о функциях экологического стресса. Вестник Челябинского педагогического университета. Психологические науки, 9, 126-130. http://globalf5.com/Zhurnaly/Psihologiya-i-pedagogika/Vestnik-Chel-GPU/vypusk-2015-9

Долгова, В.И., Василенко, Е.А. (2016) Экологический стресс и отношение к месту своего проживания у старшеклассников в экологически неблагополучных местах. Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета. Психологические науки, 10, 141-147 https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskiy-stress-i-otnoshenie-k-mestu-svoego-prozhivaniya-u-starsheklassnikov-v-ekologicheski-neblagopoluchnyh-mestah.

Кряж, И. В. (2012). Психология глобальных экологических изменений: монография. Х.: ХНУ имени В. Н. Каразина. http://dspace.univer.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/10527

Кряж, И. В. (2013) Психология смысловой регуляции экологически релевантного поведения. (Дис. д. психол. наук). Харьковский национальный университет имени В.Н. Каразина, Харьков. http://dspace.univer.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/10671

Кряж, И.В. (2013a) К проблеме психологической регуляции взаимодействия человека с природным окружением. Гуманитарные и естественнонаучные факторы решения экологических проблем и устойчивого развития: материалы десятой международной научно-практической конференции. Университет РАО, Новомосковский филиал. Новомосковск, 71-76.

Кряж, И.В. (2013b) Роль экологической позиции личности в регуляции экологически значимых действий. Актуальні проблеми психології: Збірник наукових праць Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України. Екологічна психологія, 7 (33), 268-277. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313632876_Vlianie_ekologiceskoj_pozicii_licnosti_na_otnosenie_k_ekologiceskoj_kinoprodukcii_Influence_of_personal_ecological_position_on_the_attitude_toward_ecological_motion_pictures

Кряж, І.В. (2017) Особистість в умовах глобальних екологічних змін: сприйняття загроз та долаюча поведінка. Особистість як суб’єкт подолання кризових ситуацій: психологічна теорія і практика. С.Д. Максименко, С.Б. Кузікова, В.Л. Зливків (Ред.), Суми : Вид-во СумДПУ імені А.С. Макаренка, 61-80.

Кряж, І.В., Баєва, К.О. (2016). Екологічна стурбованість як умова екологічно відповідальної поведінки. Актуальні проблеми психології: Збірник наукових праць Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України. Екологічна психологія, 7 (41), 180-190.

Моховиков, А.Н., Дыхне, Е.А. (2006). Кризисы и травмы. М.: Изд-во психологического центра Гештальт-анализа «Искусство выживания». https://vitaliyeliseev.com/library/allarticles/krizisy-i-travmy-aleksandr-mokhovikov/

Carver, C. (2013). Coping. In: Gellman M.D., Turner J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, New York, NY.

Casey, P. J. & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentric – anthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology. 58(2), 57-67.

Harju-Autti, P. (2013). Measuring Environmental Awareness in Nineteen States in India. Universal Journal of Environmental Research & Technology, 3(5), 544-554.

Homburg, A., Stolberg, A., & Wagner, U. (2007). Coping with global environmental problems: Development and first validation of scales. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 754-778.

Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company, 219–239.

Lazarus, R.S. & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-Related Transactions between Person and Environment. In: Pervin, L.A. and Lewis, M., Eds., Perspectives in Interactional Psychology, Plenum, New York, 287-327.

Neugebauer, B. (2004). Die Erfassung von Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten. Zentrum fur Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen ZUMA. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48505-2 [The recording of environmental awareness and behavior. In Deutsch].

Niaura, A. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of environmental behavior among youth. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 1, 74-81.

Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 225-233.

Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change, May-June (2011). https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Wong, P. T. (1993). Effective management of life stress: The resource–congruence model. Stress medicine, 9(1), 51-60.

References

Ababkov, V.A., Perre, M. (2004). Adaptation to stress. SPb.: Rech. [In Russian]

Baieva, K.O. (2017). Coping strategies of the person as resources for coping with environmental threats. «Vektory psykholohii - 2017». Materialy mizhnarodnoi molodizhnoi konferentsii. Kharkiv, 63-66. [In Russian]

Baieva, K.O. (2019). The role of ecological position to determine the orientation of environmental activity and evaluation the justice of the interaction. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii», 2(1), 17-23. [In Ukrainian].

Barkovskaya, A.Yu., Nazarova, M.P. (2014). Stress factors in the sociocultural spase of a modern metropolitan city. Primo Aspectu, 5(16), 37–42. [In Russian]

Bodrov, V.A. (2006). Psychological stress: development and overcoming. M.: Per Sе. [In Russian].

Vasilenko, E.A. (2015). On the problem of the functions of environmental stress. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Psihologicheskie nauki. 9, 126-130. [In Russian]

Dolgova, V.I., Vasilenko, E.A. (2016). Environmental stress and the attidudes to the place of residence of the pupils of the senior classes living in the areas of ecological trouble. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Psihologicheskie nauki. 10, 141-147 [In Russian]

Kryazh, I. V. (2012). Psychology of global environmental change. Kh.: KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. [In Russian]

Kryazh, I.V. (2013). Psychology of meaning regulation of environmentally relevant behavior. (Doctoral dissertation). V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv. [In Russian]

Kryazh, I.V.(2013а). On the problem of psychological regulation of human interaction with the natural environment. Gumanitarnyie i estestvennonauchnyie faktoryi resheniya ekologicheskih problem i ustoychivogo razvitiya: materialyi desyatoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Universitet RAO, Novomoskovskiy filial. Novomoskovsk, 71-76 [In Russian]

Kryazh, I.V. (2013b). Role of ecological position of the person in regulation of environmentally significant actions. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Ekolohichna psykholohiia, 7(33), 268-277. [In Russian]

Kryazh, I.V. (2017). Personality in conditions of global ecological changes: the perception of threats and coping behavior. Osobystist yak subiekt podolannia kryzovykh sytuatsii: psykholohichna teoriia i praktyka. S.D. Maksymenko, S.B. Kuzikova, V.L. Zlyvkiv (Red.), Sumy : Vyd-vo SumDPU imeni A.S. Makarenka, 61 80. [In Ukrainian]

Kryazh, I.V., Baieva, K.O. (2016). Environmental concern as condition of environmentally responsible behaviour. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy. Ekolohichna psykholohiia, 7 (41), 180-190. [In Ukrainian]

Mokhovikov, A.N. Dykhne, E.A. (2006). Crises and trauma’s. M.: Izd-vo psihologicheskogo tsentra Geshtalt-analiza «Iskusstvo vyizhivaniya». [In Russian]

Carver. C. (2013). Coping. In: Gellman M.D., Turner J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, New York, NY.

Casey, P. J. & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentric – anthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology. 58(2), 57-67.

Harju-Autti, P. (2013). Measuring Environmental Awareness in Nineteen States in India. Universal Journal of Environmental Research & Technology, 3(5), 544-554.

Homburg, A., Stolberg, A., & Wagner, U. (2007). Coping with global environmental problems: Development and first validation of scales. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 754-778.

Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company, 219–239.

Lazarus, R.S. & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-Related Transactions between Person and Environment. In: Pervin, L.A. and Lewis, M., Eds., Perspectives in Interactional Psychology, Plenum, New York, 287-327.

Neugebauer, B. (2004). Die Erfassung von Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten. Zentrum fur Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen ZUMA. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48505-2 [The recording of environmental awareness and behavior. In Deutsch].

Niaura, A. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of environmental behavior among youth. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 1, 74-81.

Ojala, M. (2012). How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 225-233.

Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change, May-June (2011). https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Wong, P. T. (1993). Effective management of life stress: The resource–congruence model. Stress medicine, 9(1), 51-60.

Published
2020-12-26
Cited
How to Cite
Кряж, І. В., & Баєва, К. О. (2020). The Role of the Ecological Worldview Position in Coping with Problems Caused by Global Environmental Change. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, (69), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2020-69-09