OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE AND BEHAVIOR SELF-REGULATION IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE PERSONAL COMPONENT OF INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE

Павло Олександрович Севост`янов V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Svobody sq,. 4. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-9920

Keywords: individual experience, personal component of individual experience, openness to experience, self-regulation, students

Abstract

The article briefl discusses the stages of studying individual experience, and presents modern models of the structural organization of individual experience. The individual components of the experiment are considered, brief characteristics of each component are given. Emphasis is placed on research within the framework of a three-factor model of individual experience A.N. Laktionova, in which the personal, social and mnemonic components are highlighted. The dynamic aspects of the interaction of substructures of individual experience are considered. The results of the previous analysis devoted to the problem of studying the personal component of individual experience are briefl summarized: the results of the study of openness to experience with value and meaningful life orientation are described. A study on the self-concept in the structure of the personal component of individual experience is considered. The concepts of openness to experience and self-regulation are considered directly within the scope of the article, and the focus of research attention on them is justifid.

The paper is devoted to the study of openness to experience and self-regulation in the structure of the personal component of individual experience, within which the peculiarities of the relationship of these phenomena were analyzed. A study on a sample of 154 students revealed that there is no connection between openness to experience and such a style of self-regulation of behavior as programming. At the same time, strong interconnections of openness to experience with such self-regulation indicators as planning, modeling, performance evaluation, flexibility, independence, and also with the general level of self-regulation were revealed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.

Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.

Laktionov A. N. (1998). The Coordinates of individual experience. Kharkov: Business-Inform, 1998. - 492 p. [In Russian].

Laktionov, O. M. (2000). Structural and dynamic organization of individual experience. dis ... Doctor of Psychological Sciences: 19.00.01. K. - 374 p. [In Ukrainian].

Sevostianov P. (2018). The Self-concept in the Personal Component of Individual Experience Structure. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 64, 51-55.

Sevostianov P. O. (2011) The relationship of value orientations and openness to the experience of students. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 45, 259-261. [In Russian].

Sevostianov P. O. (2018) The Relationship Between the Openness of Experience and the Semantic-life Orientation of Students. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 63, 12-16. [In Ukrainian].

Shvalb Yu. M. (2005). Psychological Forms of Life Experience Fixation. Actual problems of psychology: Psychological hermeneutics. N.V. Chepeva. (Ed.). K .: Milenium, 2 (3), 14-20. [In Russian].