SUBJECTIVITIES OF MEDICALIZED SOCIETY
Abstract
The article analyzes the modern health-obsessed society, understood as an operational result of the politics of health and the next phase of expansion of medicalization, basically defined within the framework of the half-century-old concept of biopolitics, and which has become relevant again due to the use of typically «Foucauldian» and high-tech supported medical-political actions as a response to the recent pandemic. Today, despite the diversity of theories and conceptualizations of "health-and-well-being", the medically-conscious subject in a medicalized society is idealized in every way; through his activity, awareness and initiative he modeled as capable of being prosperous and socially fit. This is exactly the kind of self-imagination by medical aspects that defines and marks the field of genesis, communication, and «collaboration» of medicalized subjectivities and forming the manners of their construction. Along the line of biopolitics’ explication – from «discipline» to «control», then to «self-controls» and further – «patient», «consumer» and «hacker» come one after another as supplementary to each other. They are personifications of certain attitudes to health, and of the dominant practices and techniques associated with these attitudes, and of typical resulting effects of these attitudes, that is subjectivities. They differ in the levels of activity on the market of medical services, in the degrees of controllability by the authorities, in the advancement in scientific knowledge, in the attitudes to institutionalized medicine and to health care systems. But they are homogeneous, conceptualizing and imagining the «self» as a computed biological body; this body emits data that can be tracked as evidence of health status and used to improve own performance and fitness.
Downloads
References
About the public health system: Law of Ukraine. (2023). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 26. Art. 93. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2573-20#Text (In Ukrainian).
Agamben, G. (2021). Homo Sacer: edizione integrale: 1995-2015 (Seconda edizione). Quodlibet.
Agamben, G. (2002). L’ aperto: l’ uome e l’ animale (Prima ed.). Bollati Boringhieri.
Ajana, B. (2018). Communal Self-Tracking: Data Philanthropy, Solidarity and Privacy. In B. Ajana (Ed.). Self-tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations. Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 125–141). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2_9
Ajana, B. (2017). Digital Health and the Biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health 3, 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/2055207616689509
Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019). (2020). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/pdf_files/BD_49th-en.pdf (29.12.24)
Bickenbach, J. (2017). WHO’s Definition of Health: Philosophical Analysis. In T. Schramme, S. Edwards (Eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. (pp. 961–974). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_48
Conrad, P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Esposito, R. (2023). Common Immunity: Biopolitics in the Age of the Pandemic (Z. Hanafi, Trans.; English edition). Polity Press.
Esposito, R. (2020). Cured to the bitter end. In F. Castrillón, & T. Marchevsky (2021). Coronavirus, Psychoanalysis, and Philosophy: Conversations on Pandemics, Politics, and Society. (pp. 28–29). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Foucault, M. (1977). El nacimiento de la medicina social. In Revista Centroamericana de Ciencias de la Salud. Enero-Abril, Ano 3, Numero 6. (pp. 89–108).
Foucault, M. (1994a). L’évolution de la notion d’ «individu dangereux» dans la psychiatrie légale du XIXe siècle. In Dits et Écrits 1954-1988. III 1976-1979. n220. (pp. 443–464). Galimard.
Foucault, M. (1979). La politique de la santé au XVIIIe siècle. In A. Thalamy, B. Kriegel, M. Foucault, F. Béguin, & B. Fortier. Les Machines à Guérir aux Origines de l’Hôpital Moderne. (pp. 7–18)P. Mardaga.
Foucault, M. (1994b). Pouvoir et corps. In Dits et Écrits 1954-1988. II 1970-1975. n157. (pp. 754–760). Galimard.
Foucault, M. (1994c). Pouvoir et savoir. In Dits et Écrits 1954-1988. III 1976-1979. n216. (pp. 399–414). Galimard.
Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, Territoire, Population: Cours au Collège de France, 1977-1978. Gallimard.
Grewe-Salfeld, M. (2022). Biohacking, Bodies and Do-It-Yourself: The Cultural Politics of Hacking Life Itself (First published). Transcript.
Groll, D. (2015). Medicine and Well-being. In G. Fletcher (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of philosophy of well-being. (pp. 504–516). Routledge.
Han, B.-C. (2019). Kapitalismus und Todestrieb. Essays und Gespräche. Matthes & Seitz.
Jerome, N., & Schöngut-Grollmus, N. (2023). A Reconsideration of the Concept of Well-Being from a Foucauldian Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 43(3), 133–143. DOI: 10.1037/teo0000226
Lupton, D. (2022). COVID Societies : Theorising the Coronavirus Crisis. Routledge.
Lupton, D. (2018). Lively Data, Social Fitness and Biovalue: The Intersections of Health and Fitness Self-tracking and Social Media. In J. Burgess, A. E. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Social Media. (pp. 562–578). Sage Publications.
Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Polity.
Marling, R., Pajević, M. (2023). Introduction: Health and Biopolitics in COVID-19 Times – What Constitutes a Healthy Society? In R. Marling, M. Pajević (Eds.) Care, control and COVID-19: Health and Biopolitics in Philosophy and Literature. (pp. 1–24) De Gruyter.
Patton, C. (2010). Introduction: Foucault after Neoliberalism; or, The Clinic Here and Now. In C. Patton, & University of Minnesota Institute for Advanced Study. Rebirth of the Clinic: Places and Agents in Contemporary Health Care. (pp. IX–XX). University of Minnesota Press.
Petersén, M. (2023). Body descriptions in biohacking and their overlaps and origins. DigitCult – Scientific Journal On Digital Cultures, 8(1), 7–24. DOI: 10.36158/97888929573671
Petersen, M. (2018). Human-Technology Relationships in the Digital Age: The Collapse of Metaphor in Biohacking. In J. Aagaard, J. K. B. O. Friis, J. Sorenson, O. Tafdrup, & C. Hasse (Eds.) Postphenomenological Methodologies: New Ways in Mediating Techno-Human Relationships. (pp. 65–81). Lexington Books.
Rose, N. S. (2007). Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First century. Princeton University Press.
Schramme, T. (2023). Health as Complete Well-Being: The WHO Definition and Beyond. Public Health Ethics, Vol. 16, Is. 3, 210–218. DOI: 10.1093/phe/phad017
Sloterdijk, P. (1983). Kritik der Zynischen Vernunft. Zweiter Band (1. Aufl). Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
Vint, S. (2021). Biopolitical Futures in Twenty-First-Century Speculative Fiction. Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2025 Михайло Шильман , Кирило Широков

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.