LOGIC METHODS OF EXPRESSION IN HUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE
Abstract
Purpose: finding out the features of logical methods for obtaining conclusions on humanitarian subjects. The task of this scientific research is to analyze the logical paradigmatic aspects of humanitarian knowledge, such as the differences in the formation of sets, logical forms and conclusions, and so on. Methods: a set of logical methods such as analysis, synthesis, abstraction and generalization, informal logic of understanding, etc. Scientific novelty: the logic of humanitarian knowledge is formed on the basis of the logic of historical knowledge, the specificity of which is manifested in the special meaning of individual sets that receive direct and indirect meaning, form the corresponding logical connections in obtaining conclusions. When obtaining conclusions on humanitarian subjects, the formation of an exemplary individual is a plurality. Its ideal qualities are transferred to an unnamed set. Thus, the integrity of the humanitarian subject is created. In the transition from parts to the whole there is a “logical jump”, which is also the difference in the procedure for obtaining a conclusion. Widely used rational understanding by identifying the value of the whole. Understanding can be strong or weak. The difference in the logic of humanitarian knowledge is primarily due to the peculiarity of the work of human thinking, which uses specific tools in formatting various scientific disciplines and organizing the cognitive process. Among the many new approaches and methods of the humanities developed in phenomenology, existentialism, philosophy of life, structuralism, postmodernism, etc., hermeneutics should be noted. It is hermeneutics that occupies a special place in humanitarian knowledge due to its ontology and logic. Conclusions: the logic of humanitarian knowledge is formed on the basis of historical consciousness, relies on ontology and has signs of the logic of practical thinking. In its formation, it is advisable to use the theory of practical judgments and conclusions, taking into account subjective values of life experience, obtaining the logical values of truth and falsehood. The terms of deductive and non-deductive forms are based on judgments about values. The logic of humanitarian knowledge to a large extent is hermeneutical logic, which, in turn, is the logic of rational understanding.
Downloads
References
/References
Aristotle. (1976). On Interpretation. (M. I. Itkin, Trans.). In Aristotle, The Collected Writings in 4 Volumes (Vol. 2, pp. 97‒116). Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
Bollnow, O. F. (1983). Studien zur Hermeneutik (Band 2: Zur hermeneutischen Logik von Georg Misch und Hans Lipps). München: Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg. (In German).
Dilthey, V. (1988). Sketches and Critics of Historical Reason. (A. P. Ogurtsov, Trans.). Voprosy Filosofii – Philosophy Issues, 4, 135‒152. (In Russian).
Popovich, M. V. (Ed.). (1986). Proof and Understanding: Collection of Scientific Papers. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. (In Russian).
Ivin, A. A. (1997). Fundamentals of the Theory of Argumentation. Moscow: Vlados. (In Russian).
Ishmuratov, A. T. (1982). Understanding and Deduction. In M. V. Popovich (Ed.), Understanding as a Logical-Epistemological Problem: Collection of Scientific Papers (pp. 250‒258). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. (In Russian).
Krymsky, S. B. (1965). Interpretation as a Logical Operation. Voprosy Filosofii – Philosophy Issues, 11, 47‒56. (In Russian).
Kuznetsov, V. G. (1991). Hermeneutics and Humanitarian Knowledge. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University. (In Russian).
Popovich, M. V. (1982). Understanding as a Logical-Epistemological Problem. In M. V. Popovich (Ed.), Understanding as a Logical-Epistemological Problem: Collection of Scientific Papers (pp. 5–23). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. (In Russian).
Rodi, F. (1996). Hermeneutic Logic in the Phenomenological Perspective: <…> Gustav Shpet. (I. Chubarov, Trans.). Logos, 7, 41‒46. (In Russian).
Shpet, G. G. (1916). History as a Problem of Logic. Critical and Methodological Research. Moscow: A. I. Mamontov’s Publishing House. (In Russian).
Yurkevich, O. M. (2018). Hermeneutical Logic: Monograph. Latvia: Lambert Academic Publishing. (In Ukrainian).
Аристотель. Об истолковании / пер. с древнегреч. М. И. Иткина. Сочинения: в 4-х т.; т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1976. С. 97‒116.
Дильтей В. Наброски и критика исторического разума / пер. с нем. А. П. Огурцов. Вопросы философии. 1988. № 4. С. 135‒152.
Доказательство и понимание: cб. науч. трудов / отв. ред. М. В. Попович. К.: Наукова думка, 1986. 312 с.
Ивин А. А. Основы теории аргументации. М.: Владос, 1997. 351 с.
Ишмуратов А. Т. Понимание и дедукция. Понимание как логико-гносеологическая проблема: cб. науч. трудов / отв. ред. М. В. Попович. К.: Наукова думка, 1982. С. 250‒258.
Крымский С. Б. Интерпретация как логическая операция. Вопросы философии. 1965. № 11. С. 47‒56.
Кузнецов В. Г. Герменевтика и гуманитарное познание. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1991. 192 с.
Попович М. В. Понимание как логико-гносеологическая проблема. Понимание как логико-гносеологическая проблема: cб. науч. трудов / отв. ред. М. В. Попович. К.: Наукова думка, 1982. С. 5‒23.
Роди Ф. Герменевтическая логика в феноменологической ретроспективе: <…> Густав Шпет / пер. с нем. И. Чубарова. Логос. 1996. № 7. С. 41‒46.
Шпет Г. Г. История как проблема логики. Критические и методологические исследования. М.: Тип. А. И. Мамонтова, 1916. 473 с.
Юркевич О. М. Герменевтична логіка: монографія. Latvia: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2018. 93 c.
Bollnow O. F. Studien zur Hermeneutik. Band 2. Zur hermeneutischen Logik von Georg Misch und Hans Lipps. München: Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg, 1983. 295 s.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.