Linguistic personality of Ivan Franko in the matrimonial directive discourse
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to reveal specific features of the realization of the linguistic personality of I. Franko in the matrimonial directive discourse. The source base for the analysis was I. Franko’s letters to O. Khoruzhynskaya. The analysis of I. Franko's linguistic personality done within a cognitive-discursive paradigm, using discourse-analysis, intent-analysis, contextual analysis, methods of analysis and synthesis, descriptive method. Іt was established that the intension of directive in the speech of I. Franko was aimed at the expression of advice, requests and questions. The writer seeks a positive settlement at regulating his wife’s health problems, her life and scientific work, financial issues. It also prompts the wife to take care of oneself and children, to perform / not to perform certain actions towards him / other persons, to write a work or to engage in literary activities of family’s acquaintances. I. Franko asks wife to determine his further actions in certain everyday situations. The question is a means of getting new information about the wife's daily affairs, the children’s health state, domestic problems, weather conditions, common friends or the reasons for the absence of letters from his wife. I. Franko uses a question for reconciling family planning. Linguistic means: declarative, imperative and interrogative / interrogative-imperative sentences, verbs of the imperative / conditional mood, imperative verbs together with the infinitive / negative particle not, the verb ask in the 1st person singular, personal pronouns, adverbs, restrictive / emphatic particles and exclamation, etc. Complex sentences provide expressions of incentives and their argumentation. The speech is characterized by obsolete / colloquial words, dialecticisms, polonizms, russisms and chekhisms. The writer uses phraseologisms, metaphors, similes, words in figurative meaning. Terms of endearment and means of expressing courtesy show favor to the addressee. Consequently, the directive discourse ensures the realization of Ivan Franko’s linguistic personality in family communication on the motivational, linguistic-cognitive and lexico-grammatical levels.
Downloads
References
Artemenko, A. (2000). Pytannia-perepyty v prahmalinhvistychnomu aspekti [Question-digest in the pragmalinguistic aspect]. Naukovi zapysky [Kirovohradskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Vynnychenka]. Ser.: Filolohichni nauky – Research Bulletin [Kirovohrad Volodymyr Vynnychenko State Pedagogical University]. Ser.: Philological Sciences, 22(1), 15-22 [in Ukrainian].
Balandina, N. F. (2002). Funktsii i znachennia cheskykh prahmatychnykh klishe v komunikatyvnomu aspekti [The functions and values of the Czech pragmatic cliches in the communicative aspect]. Kyiv: ASMU [in Ukrainian].
Golubovska, I. O. (2004). Etnichni osoblyvosti movnykh kartyn svitu [Ethnic peculiarities of world language paintings]. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukrainian].
Hrynyshyn, M. M. (2009). Statusno fiksovanyi movlennievyi akt prokhannia (na materiali khudozhnoi prozy Ivana Franka) [Status fixed speech act of the request (on the material of Ivan Franko's artistic prose)]. Naukovi pratsi [Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly]. Ser.: Filolohiia. Movoznavstvo – Scientific works [Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University]. Ser.: Philology. Linguistics, 85, 9-13 [in Ukrainian].
Zahnitko, A. P. (2019). Komunikatyvnyi i dyskursyvnyi prostir movnoi osobystosti Ivana Franka [Communicative and discursive space of linguistic personality of Ivan Franko]. Aktualni problemy filolohii ta perekladoznavstva – Current issues of linguistics and translation studies, 6, 72-81 [in Ukrainian].
Zagnitko, A. P. (2012). Slovnyk suchasnoi linhvistyky: poniattia i terminy [Glossary of Modern Linguistics: Concepts and Terms] (Vols. 2). Donetsk: DonNU [in Ukrainian].
Karaulov, Yu. N. (1987). Russkiy yazuk i yazukovaya lichnost [Russian Language and Linguistic Personality]. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Kosmeda, T. A. (2006). Komunikatyvna kompetentsiia Ivana Franka: mizhkulturni, interpersonalni, rytorychni vymiry [Communicative Competence of Ivan Franko: Intercultural, Interpersonal, Rhetorical Dimensions]. Lviv: PAIS [in Ukrainian].
Kuryanovich, A. V. (2010). «Figura umolchanyia» v sisteme funktsionalnoy stilistiki: k voprosu opredeleniya stilisticheskogo statusa еpistolyariya [«The figure of silence» in the system of functional stylistics: to the question of determining the stylistic status of the epistolary]. Vestnyk THPU – TSPU Bulletin, 6, 84-87 [in Russian].
Matsko, L. (2016). Lingvokomunikatyvnyi prostir movnoi osobystosti Ivana Franka: do 160-yi richnytsi vid dnia narodzhennia Ivana Franka [The linguocommunicative space of the linguistic personality of Ivan Franko: to the 160th anniversary from the birth of Ivan Franko]. Dyvoslovo – The oddly enough, 7-8, 34-41 [in Ukrainian].
Pocheptsov, G. G. (1978). Ponyatiye kommunikativnoy transformatsii [The concept of communicative transformation]. Predlozheniye i tekst v semanticheskom aspekte – Sentence and text in semantic aspect (рр. 49-63). Kalynyn: Kalyn. State un-t [in Russian].
Salionovych, L. M. (2009). Movna svidomist Ivana Franka u vymirakh hendernoi linhvistyky [Linguistic consciousness of Ivan Franko in the dimensions of gender linguistics]. Psykholinhvistyka – Psycholinguistics, 4, 170-176 [in Ukrainian].
Trumko, O. (2018). Movna osobystist Ivana Franka u matrymonialnomu informatyvnomu dyskursi [Linguistic personality of Ivan Franko in matrimonial infоrmative discourse]. Pivdennyi arkhiv – Southern Archive, LХХІІ (I), 53-57 [in Ukrainian].
Fesenko, O. P. (2009). Kompleksnoуe іssledovanіye frazeologii druzheskogo еpystolyarnogo diskursa pervoy treti ХХ veka [Comprehensive study of phraseology of friendly epistolary discourse of the first third of the XIX century]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tomsk [in Russian].
Franko, I. (1986). Zibrannia tvoriv: u 50 t. [Collected Works: in 50 vols.] (Vols. 49-50). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Franko, O. B. (2007). Semantychni ta prahmatychni parametry sponukalnoho dyskursu (na materiali nimetskomovnykh khudozhnikh tvoriv ХХ st.) [Semantic and Pragmatic Parameters of Inducement Discourse (a Study of German literature of the XXth century)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: KNLU [in Ukrainian].
