Psychological features of using video lectures as additional materials in the digitalized educational process
Abstract
The article presents a study of the psychological aspects of using video lectures as an additional educational resource for a hybrid or distance education course. Various formats of interaction between students and teachers through digital technologies have become an integral part of adapting the educational process to modern challenges. Some teachers recognize the necessity or desirability of having video lectures as teaching materials. However, they have not yet started creating their video lectures, although their own video lectures increase the level of professional and pedagogical competence of the teacher according to the European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu).
The purpose of the study is to analyze the impact of video lectures as additional materials to the educational course on the example of the interdisciplinary course “Psychology of Communication” at V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University.
The study analyzes video lectures from the perspective of communication psychology as part of Jacobson’s communication model. The psychological aspects of students are considered (the influence of the teacher’s personality on the video, the involvement of sensitive perception systems of students). Activation of the visual and auditory representational systems during video viewing has been established. Possibilities of indirect sensitization of olfactory, tactile and taste systems by means of presentation of specific content in video material are discussed. The level of involvement and motivation of students to study materials with the help of video lectures and the possible interactive formats of the video lecturer and students are evaluated. The crucial role of the teacher’s authenticity as a real person and the influence of non-verbal and extra-linguistic information transfer are highlighted.
Based on the results of the research, a list of recommendations for teachers on creating effective video lectures was developed and proposed for implementation.
Downloads
References
2. Masur, H. (2022). Problems of modern pedagogical discourse. Dnieper State Agrarian and Economic University. https://dspace.dsau.dp.ua/handle/123456789/6702 [in Ukrainian].
3. Ronzhes, O. (2021). Determining the level of digital competence as a necessary skill under the conditions of the transition to a digital state. Problems of political psychology, 24, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.33120/poppvol24-year2021-83 [in Ukrainian].
4. Ronzhes, O. (2023, May 10). Playlist of the video lectures „psychology of communication“. YouTube.com https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWcZCgC48AxQqJExUvfKQ6e89IWwVvvAr [in Ukrainian].
5. Aristotle‘s model of communication. (n.d.). Management Study Guide - Courses for Students, Professionals & Faculty Members. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/aristotle-model-of-communication.htm
6. Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M., & Kuss, D. J. (Eds.). (2018). The oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198812746.001.0001
7. Bouissac, P. (Ed.). (1998). Encyclopedia of semiotics. Oxford University Press.
8. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445
9. Coursera | degrees, certificates, & free online courses. (n.d.). Coursera. https://www.coursera.org
10. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of
reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
11. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
12. DigCompEdu. (n.d.). EU Science Hub. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu_en
13. Digital education action plan (2021-2027). (n.d.). European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
14. Kim, L. E., Jörg, V., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher
effectiveness and burnout. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2
15. Krishna, A., Cian, L., & Sokolova, T. (2016). The power of sensory marketing in advertising. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.007
16. Mayer, R. E. (2012). Multimedia learning. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.
17. Nesi, J., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2022). Handbook of adolescent digital media use and mental health. Cambridge University Press.
18. Pacansky-Brock, M., & Costa, K. (2020). 99 tips for creating simple and sustainable educational videos: A guide for online teachers and flipped classes. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
19. Schriver, K. A. (1997). Dynamics in document design. Wiley Computer Pub.
20. Wiyono, B. B., Wedi, A., Kusumaningrum, D. E., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Comparison of the effectiveness of using online and offline communication techniques to build human relations with students in learning at schools. In 2021 9th international conference on information and education technology (ICIET). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciet51873.2021.9419660
21. Wu, W.-Y., Guo, J.-Y., Li, Y.-J., & Sun, Y.-L. (2023). Research on the design of virtual reality online education information presentation based on multi-sensory cognition. Inventions, 8(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions8020063
22. Jakobson‘s model. (n.d.). Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/ authority.20110803100016553
23. Zhukova, O., Mandragelia, V., Chepurna, V., Ivanenko, L., Noskova, M. (2024). A model of using digital information systems to create video game contexts: The case of GPT models and its effect. Ingénierie des Systèmes d’Information, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 659-667. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.290227
