LEGAL NATURE OF CONCLUSION CONTRACTS
Abstract
Introduction. The article is devoted to studying the legal nature of conclusive contracts. Having experienced the first attempts at legal regulation in Roman law, conclusive contracts have undergone an evolutionary path to today's understanding. Case law and legal doctrine demonstrate the urgent need for a detailed definition and application of conclusive contract rules. The development of international relations and integration processes actualise the practicality of a detailed analysis of the legal nature of concluding contracts.
Summary. First, there is an urgent need to establish in detail the definition and rules of application of concluding agreements. Today, conclusive contracts are widely used: buying goods or exchanging currency through vending machines, purchasing goods in self-service stores, paying for public transport through terminals, giving gifts through the transfer of a symbol (for example, car keys), paying for services without signing the corresponding act of services rendered, etc. Conclusive contracts are based on the performance of conclusive actions, which are not a form of contract, but a way of expressing a will for contracts concluded in verbal form. Conclusive actions themselves can be performed by performing actions or speaking words. In any case, conclusive actions are an active form of expression of will, unlike silence. The legal nature of conclusive contracts is based on a cause-and-effect relationship between actions and consequences. The point is the impossibility of denying the result of one's actions if they were done consciously and freely.
Conclusions. In the study, the author notes that conclusive are contracts in which a person's will to agree is embodied by performing conclusive actions. It is also proven that the legal nature of conclusive contracts is based on the principles of Roman law and characterises them as a way of the will expressed in verbal contracts. In some cases, conclusive contracts can be concluded by speaking words and not just by doing actions.
Downloads
References
/References
Paul J. du Plessis, Clifford Ando, and Kaius Tuori (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks, 2016. 728 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.002.0003 (date of access: 03.02.2023).
MacCormack G. Contractual Theory and the Innominate Contracts. SDHI. 1985. No. 51. P. 131.
Валігура К. Принцип добросовісності як категорія цивільного права. Підприємництво, господарство і право. 2020. № 4. С. 11–16. URL: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.4.02 (дата звернення: 10.01.2023).
Christian von Bar, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference. München: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2008. 1620 p.
Цивільний кодекс України: Кодекс України від 16.01.2003 р. № 435-IV : станом на 1 січ. 2023 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (дата звернення: 18.01.2023).
Concluding Actions, The practice of using terms, words and phrases in jurisprudence. Ligazakon.net. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/TS000412 (дата звернення: 18.01.2023).
Иоффе О.С. Советское гражданское право: курс лекций. Общая часть. Право собственности. Общее учение об обязательствах. Ленинград: Ленингр. ун-т., 1958. 347 с.
Єременко К. Співвідношення понять «форма правочину» та «спосіб волевиявлення» у цивільному праві України. Юридичний вісник. 2013. № 2. С. 114–119.
Рішення Очаківського міськрайонного суду Миколаївської області від 25.01.2022 р. у справі № 483/1718/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102771772 (дата звернення: 09.01.2023).
Постанова Судової палати у господарських справах Верховного Суду України від 19.08.2014 р. у справі № 3-59гс14. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/103429-konklyudentne_shvalennya.html (дата звернення: 09.01.2023).
Flume W. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. Band 2: Das Rechtsgeschäft. Berlin: Springer, 1979.
Brox H., Walker W.-D. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. München: Vahlen, 2022. 411 S.
Пастернак В. Форма правочину – невід’ємна частина його дійсності. Часопис Київського університету права. 2013. № 2. С. 215–218.
Isay H. Die Willenserklärung im Tatbestande des Rechtsgeschäfts. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1899. 109 S.
BGHZ 21, 319, Az V 223/54, NJW 1956, 1475.
Dieter B. Steuerrecht. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 2008. 481 S.
Paul J. du Plessis, Clifford Ando, and Kaius Tuori (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks, 2016. 728 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.002.0003 (date of access: 03.02.2023).
MacCormack G. Contractual Theory and the Innominate Contracts. SDHI. 1985. No. 51. P. 131.
Valigura K. The principle of good faith is like a category of civil law. Entrepreneurship, economy and law. 2020. № 4. С. 11–16. URL: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.4.02 (дата звернення: 10.01.2023).
Christian von Bar, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference. München: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2008. 1620 p.
Civil Code of Ukraine: Code of Ukraine dated 16.01.2003. № 435-IV: as of January 1, 2023. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (date of access: 18.01.2023).
Concluding Actions, The practice of using terms, words and phrases in jurisprudence. Ligazakon.net. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/TS000412 (date of access: 18.01.2023).
Ioffe O.S. Soviet civil law: a course of lectures. A common part. Property rights. The general doctrine of obligations. Leningrad: Leningrad university,1958. 347 p.
8. Eremenko K. Correlation of the concepts "form of the deed" and "way of expression of will" in the civil law of Ukraine. Legal Bulletin. 2013. № 2. P. 114–119.
The decision of the Ochakiv City and District Court of the Mykolaiv Region dated January 25, 2022, in the case № 483/1718/21. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102771772 (date of access: 09.01.2023).
Resolution of the Commercial Chamber of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated August 19, 2014, in the case № 3-59гс14. URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/103429-konklyudentne_shvalennya.html (date of access: 09.01.2023).
Flume W. Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts. Band 2: Das Rechtsgeschäft. Berlin: Springer, 1979.
Brox H., Walker W.-D. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. München: Vahlen, 2022. 411 S.
Pasternak V. The form of the deed is an integral part of its validity. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law. 2013. 2. P. 215–218.
Isay H. Die Willenserklärung im Tatbestande des Rechtsgeschäfts. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 1899. 109 S.
BGHZ 21, 319, Az V 223/54, NJW 1956, 1475.
Dieter B. Steuerrecht. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 2008. 481 S.
Copyright (c) 2022 Віктор Савченко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.