SECTORAL PROTECTION OF INFORMATION PRIVACY IN THE USA

Keywords: human rights, the right to privacy, privacy, information privacy, US law

Abstract

The level of scientific understanding of the US experience in the legal protection of information privacy does not correspond to modern technological, socio-economic, and political and legal challenges that have arisen before Ukraine. The article provides a comprehensive description of the current US legislation on the protection of information privacy in the private sector, highlights the essential features that distinguish the approaches of the American legislator in this field from others, primarily European ones, and also identify prospects for the development of American legislation, taking into account the latest threats to privacy, arising in the conditions of rapid development of information and communication technologies.

The American system of information privacy protection  primarily uses the so-called sectoral approach. The essence of this approach is that the protection of information privacy is carried out only within a specific aspect (context) of collecting or using information and is aimed at pre-defined sectors of public life or specific groups of people. Accordingly, federal laws are classified into several groups: 1) protecting privacy in the field of finance; 2) protecting  privacy in the field of education; 4) protecting privacy in health care; 5) protecting children privacy; 6) protecting consumer privacy.

The federal sectoral approach in the United States is adaptive in nature: Congress intervened to regulate information privacy when new problems arose, and it was mainly new technological developments. In other words, when a new technology threatened the information privacy or perhaps grew at an unacceptable rate, Congress provided protection through the lens of a certain sector or category of people most affected by this new technology. The US experience makes it possible to clearly understand that the protection of information privacy and what should be considered sensitive can change rapidly due to changes in the way data is collected, processed and stored by various actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. O. Seryogin, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Professor of Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
Doctor of Science (Law), Full Professor
Svobody Square, 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
v.a.seryogin@karazin.ua

References

Ємчук Л.В. Конституційно-правове регулювання особистого та сімейного життя людини і громадянина: автореф. дис…. канд.. юрид. наук: 12.00.02. Ужгород, 2015. 18 с.

Михайленко І.В. Право людини на недоторканність приватного життя: поняття, аспекти, механізм реалізації: Автореф. дис…. канд.. юрид. наук: 12.00.01. Харків, 2014. 20 с.

Сивухін В. С. Конституційне право людини і громадянина на невтручання в їх особисте і сімейне життя та його забезпечення органами внутрішніх справ України: дис… канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.02. Київ, 2007. 239 с.

Серьогін В.О. Право на недоторканність приватного життя (прайвесі) у конституційно-правовій теорії та практики: монографія. Харків: ФІНН, 2010. 608 с.

Серьогін В. О. Прайвесі як право «бути залишеним у спокої». Право і безпека. 2010. № 3 (35). С. 6-9.

Серьогін В. О. Медичне прайвесі: досвід США. Від громадянського суспільства – до правової держави: тези ІІІ Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (м. Харків, 24 квітня 2008 р.). Харків: Харків. нац. ун-т ім. В.Н. Каразіна, 2008. С. 207-209.

Feldman D., Haber E. Measuring and protecting privacy in the always-on era. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3404086.

Kang J. Information privacy in cyberspace transactions. Stanford Law Review. 1998. Vol. 50. P. 1193-1294.

Reidenberg J. R. Privacy wrongs in search of remedies. Hastings Law Journal. 2003. Vol. 54. P. 877-898.

Solove D. J. A brief history of information privacy law. Proskauer on privacy. PLI, 2016; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 215. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=914271.

Solove D. J., Schwartz P.M. Privacy law fundamentals. 4th edition. Portsmouth, NH: International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), 2017. 318 p.

Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-508, 84 Stat. 1114 (1970).

Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (CALEA), Pub. L. No. 103-414, 108 Stat. 4279 (1994) (

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-511, 92 Stat. 1783 (1978).

Privacy Protection Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-440, 94 Stat. 1879 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa (2012).

Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-508, 100 Stat. 1848 (1986) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2522 (2012).

Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT Act) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001) (codified as amended in scattered sections of U.S.C. (2012).

Bamberger K. A., Mulligan D. K. Privacy on the Books and on the Ground. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 63. 2011. P. 247-315.

Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681.

Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-159, 117 Stat. 1952 (2003).

Right to Financial Privacy Act (RFPA), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401–22.

The Financial Services Modernization Act (Gramm-Leach-Bliley) Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (1999) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 12 & 15 U.S.C.).

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-380, 88 Stat. 57 (1974) (codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. §1232g et seq. (2012)); 34 C.F.R. § 99 (2018).

Freedom of Information Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 90-23, 81 Stat. 54 (1966); 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012).

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, 29 U.S.C. § 1181.

HIPAA Privacy Rule, 45 C.F.R. (2018).

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-233, Stat. 881 (2008).

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 226 (2009) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.)

Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach-Notification Rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules, 78 Fed. Reg. 5566, 5566 (Jan. 25, 2013).

Храмцовская М. США: Изменения в правилах HIPAA защиты медицинских персональных данных и генетическая информация. URL: http://rusrim.blogspot.com/ 2013/02/hipaa.html.

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-277, Stat. 2681-736 (1998).

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule, 64 Fed. Reg. 59,888 (Nov. 3, 1999) (codified at 16 C.F.R. § 312 (2018)).

Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-549, 98 Stat. 2779 (1984) (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 551 (2012)).

Video Privacy Protection Act Amendments Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-258, 126 Stat. 2414 (2012) (codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2710–2711 (2012)).

Ohm P. Sensitive Information. Southern California Law Review. 2015. Vol. 88. P. 1125-1196.

Published
2019-09-23
Cited
How to Cite
Seryogin, V. O. (2019). SECTORAL PROTECTION OF INFORMATION PRIVACY IN THE USA. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Law, (27), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1834-2019-27-07
Section
Конституційне та муніципальне право