A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL STANDARDS OF FORENSIC EXPERTS
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the research topic is due to the need to systematise the ethical standards of forensic experts, since ethics as one of the fundamental branches of philosophical knowledge applies to any community of people (social, political, professional, etc.); its task is to create rules of interaction to ensure uniform approaches to solving various problems and achieving harmony in social relations. Forensic examination, based on the principles of legality and objectivity, contributes to ensuring the legitimate rights and interests of all members of society. Therefore, the activities of forensic experts cannot be outside the scope of certain ethical norms and standards. The purpose of the article is to characterise the ethical standards of forensic experts and outline the areas of their possible transformation based on the analysis of ethical codes existing in English-speaking countries and in Ukraine, and using a systematic approach. The study applies the general methods of scientific cognition (ascent from the abstract to the concrete; formalisation; abstraction, analysis, analogy, synthesis), as well as a systematic approach.
Summary of the main results of the study. The article shows that there is an urgent need to harmonise national approaches to international law enforcement. The existing ethical standards of forensic experts are analysed. The necessity, areas and mechanisms of compliance with ethical standards in the field of forensic science and criminalistics are considered.
Conclusion. Ethical standards in the field of forensic science should provide for an accurate reflection of the expert’s qualifications, a truthful and detailed presentation of the data obtained as a result of the study, ensure the integrity of evidence, and provide clear and complete documentation of the expert study. At the same time, advocacy, bias, falsification and disclosure of information obtained during expert research are inadmissible.
Downloads
References
/References
Про судову експертизу : Закон України від 25.02.1994 р. № 4038-XII (зі змін. та допов.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Barnett P. D. Ethics in Forensic Science: Professional Standards for the Practice of Criminalistics. Forensic Science Communications. 2002. Vol. 4. Nо. 3.
Siegel J. A. General Forensic Ethical Dilemmas. Ethics in Forensic Science. 2012. P. 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385019-5.00003-8.
Weinstock R., Leong G. B., Silva J. A. Ethics. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. 2nd ed. Vol. 1 A–B / Еd. by J. A. Siegel, P. J. Saukko. Elsevier, 2013. Р. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00291-9 (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Pratap C. E. Ethical aspects of forensic expert evidence in criminal cases. International Journal of Novel Research and Development. 2022. Vol. 7(3). Р. 746–751. URL: https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2203091.pdf (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Moradi A., Ashouri M., Mahdavisabet M., Mehra N. Ethics of restorative justice and its role in social security. Quarterly of Order and Security Guards. 2021. Vol. 13(4). P. 205–228. URL: https://sid.ir/paper/381413/en (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Yadav P. K. Ethical issues across different fields of forensic science. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2017. Vol. 7(10). https://doi.org/1010.1186/s41935-017-0010-1).
Field Listing – Legal system. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agensy. URL: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/legal-system/ (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Larouche P., Cserne P. (Eds.). National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. The Hague : T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, 2012. 390 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-885-9.
Verdier P.-H., Versteeg M. International Law in National Legal Systems: An Empirical Investigation. American Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 109(3). P. 514. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0514.
Hörisch J., Burritt R. L., Christ K. L., Schaltegger S. Legal systems, internationalization and corporate sustainability. An empirical analysis of the influence of national and international authorities. Corporate Governance. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 5. Рр. 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2016-0169.
Прокопенко Т. О. Теорія систем і системний аналіз : навч. посіб. Черкаси : ЧДТУ, 2019. С. 12–13. URL: http://surl.li/cqloz (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Геселева Н. В., Заріцька Н. М. Емерджентні властивості системи. БІЗНЕСІНФОРМ. 2013. № 7. С. 93–97. URL: http://business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2013-7_0-pages-93_97.pdf (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Dominici G. Why Does Systems Thinking Matter? Business Systems Review. 2012. Vol. 1(1). P. 1. https://doi.org/10.7350/bsr.a02.2012.
Nilsson A., Westerberg M. Business Ethics and Systems Thinking. Systems Practice. 1997. Vol. 10. No. 4. Р. 491–506. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:982527/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Tuan N.-T., Shaw C. Consideration of Ethics in Systemic Thinking. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 2015. Vol. 29 (1). P. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9352-5.
Allen W. Systems thinking. Learning for Sustainability. URL: https://learningforsustainability.net/systems-thinking/ (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Smolin L. There is No Scientific Method. Big Think. 2013. URL: https://bigthink.com/articles/there-is-no-scientific-method/ (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Ethics Handbook for On and Off-Duty Conduct. U.S. Department of Justice. January 2016. https://www.justice.gov/jmd/page/file/190546/dl (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Code of Conduct. Canadian Society of Forensic Science. 5 Nov., 1994. URL: https://www.csfs.ca/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/ (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Code of Professional Practice for Members of the ANZFSS. Australian & New Zealand Forensic Science Society. URL: https://anzfss.org.au/resources/code-of-professional-practice/ (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Forensic Science Regulator code of practice. GOV.UK. 26 Jan., 2023. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-regulator-code-of-practice (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
A Commitment to Quality. Orchid Cellmark. 2 Oct., 2023. URL: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/about/quality-standards/ (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Code of Practice, Ethics and Professional Standards in Forensic Anthropology. Royal Anthropological Institute. https://www.therai.org.uk/images/stories/Forensic/Code%20of%20Practice%20Ethics%20and%20Professional%20Standards%20in%20Forensic%20Anthropology-Draft.pdf (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Code of practice and performance standards for forensic pathology in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Royal College of Pathologists. URL: https://www.rcpath.org/static/5617496b-cd1a-4ce3-9ec8eabfb0db8f3a/Code-of-practice-and-performance-standards-for-forensic-pathology-in-England-Wales-and-Northern-Ireland.pdf (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Code of Practice. The Expert Witness Institute. URL: https://www.ewi.org.uk/About/Code-of-Practice (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Code of practice within EuroExpert. EuroExpert. 2001. URL: https://euroexpert.org/standards/code-of-practice (accessed: 28.08.2024).
ENFSI: 73 members in 39 countries. The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. URL: https://enfsi.eu/about-enfsi/members/ (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Oversight Agreement 2023-25. Department of Justice. Forensic Science Ireland. 16 March, 2023. URL: https://assets.gov.ie/251653/b61b9b8e-2b49-4b91-9d7b-f142a8a79ade.pdf (accessed: 28.08.2024).
Кодекс етики судового експерта. ТОВ «Судова незалежна експертиза України». 30.12.2014. URL: https://ekspertiza.com.ua/uk/kodeks-etyky-sudovoho-eksperta (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Кримінальний процесуальний кодекс України від 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI (зі змін. та допов.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Цивільний процесуальний кодекс України від 18.03.2004 № 1618-IV (зі змін. та допов.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Реєстр методик проведення судових експертиз / Міністерство юстиції України. URL: https://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua/page/6 (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Класифікація судових експертиз : монографія / Е. Б. Сімакова-Єфремян, В. Л. Федоренко, Л. В. Свиридова та ін.; за заг. ред. Е. Б. Сімакової-Єфремян. Харків, 2021. С. 536.
Кодекс України про адміністративні правопорушення від 07.12.1984 р. № 8073-Х (зі змін. та допов.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#n1981 (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
Кримінальний кодекс України від 05.04.2001 р. № 2341-ІІІ (зі змін. та допов.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text (дата звернення: 28.08.2024).
REFERENCES
Law of Ukraine No. 4038-XII "On forensic examination". (February 25, 1994) (as amended and supplement-ed). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text. (in Ukrainian).
Barnett P.D. (2002). Ethics in Forensic Science: Professional Standards for the Practice of Criminalistics. Forensic Science Communications, 4(3).
Siegel J.A. (2012). General Forensic Ethical Dilemmas. In Ethics in Forensic Science (pp. 59-79). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385019-5.00003-8.
Weinstock R., Leong G.B., Silva J.A. (2013). Ethics. In Encyclopedia of forensic sciences, Vol. 1: A-B. J.A. Siegel, P.J. Saukko (Eds.) (рр. 175-180). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00291-9.
Pratap C.E. (2022). Ethical aspects of forensic expert evidence in criminal cases. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 7(3), 746-751. URL: https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2203091.pdf.
Moradi A., Ashouri M., Mahdavisabet M., Mehra, N. (2021). Ethics of restorative justice and its role in social security. Quarterly of order and security guards, 13(4), 205-228. URL: https://sid.ir/paper/381413/en.
Yadav P.K. (2017). Ethical issues across different fields of forensic science. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-017-0010-1.
Field Listing – Legal system. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agensy. URL: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/legal-system.
Larouche P., Cserne P. (Eds.). (2012). National Legal Systems and Globalization: New Role, Continuing Relevance. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-885-9.
Verdier P.-H., Versteeg M. (2015). International Law in National Legal Systems: An Empirical Investiga-tion. American Journal of International Law, 109(3), 514. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0514.
Hörisch J., Burritt R.L., Christ K.L., Schaltegger, S. (2017). Legal systems, internationalization and cor-porate sustainability. An empirical analysis of the influence of national and international authorities. Corporate Govern-ance, 17(5), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2016-0169.
Prokopenko T.O. (2019). Theory of systems and system analysis. Cherkasy: ChDTU, 12-13. https://doi.org/http://surl.li/cqloz. (in Ukrainian)
Heseleva N.V., Zaritska N.M. (2013). Emerdzhentni vlastyvosti systemy. BIZNESINFORM, 7, 93-97. URL: http://business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2013-7_0-pages-93_97.pdf. (in Ukrainian)
Dominici G. (2012). Why Does Systems Thinking Matter? Business Systems Review, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7350/bsr.a02.2012.
Nilsson A., Westerberg, M. (1997). Business Ethics and Systems Thinking. Systems Practice, 10(4), 491-506. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:982527/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Tuan N.-T., Shaw, C. (2015). Consideration of Ethics in Systemic Thinking. Systemic Practice and Ac-tion Research, 29(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9352-5.
Allen W. Systems thinking. Learning for Sustainability. URL: https://learningforsustainability.net/systems-thinking.
Smolin L. (2013). There is no Scientific Method. Big Think. May. URL: https://bigthink.com/articles/there-is-no-scientific-method.
Ethics Handbook for On and Off-Duty Conduct. (2016). U.S. Department of Justice. URL: https://www.justice.gov/jmd/page/file/190546/dl.
Code of Conduct. (November, 1994). Canadian Society of Forensic Science. URL: https://www.csfs.ca/become-a-member/code-of-conduct.
Code of Professional Practice for Members of the ANZFSS. Australian & New Zealand Forensic Science Society. URL: https://anzfss.org.au/resources/code-of-professional-practice.
Forensic Science Regulator Code of Practice. (January 26, 2023). GOV.UK. 26 Jan, 2023. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-regulator-code-of-practice.
A Commitment to Quality (October, 2023). Orchid Cellmark, 2. URL: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/about/quality-standards.
Code of Practice, Ethics and Professional Standards in Forensic Anthropology. Royal Anthropological In-stitute. URL: https://www.therai.org.uk/images/stories/Forensic/Code%20of%20Practice%20Ethics%20and%20Professional%20Standards%20in%20Forensic%20Anthropology-Draft.pdf.
Code of practice and performance standards for forensic pathology in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Royal College of Pathologists. URL: https://www.rcpath.org/static/5617496b-cd1a-4ce3-9ec8eabfb0db8f3a/Code-of-practice-and-performance-standards-for-forensic-pathology-in-England-Wales-and-Northern-Ireland.pdf.
Code of Practice. The Expert Witness Institute. URL: https://www.ewi.org.uk/About/Code-of-Practice.
Code of practice within EuroExpert. (2001). EuroExpert. URL: https://euroexpert.org/standards/code-of-practice.
ENFSI: 73 members in 39 countries. The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. URL: https://enfsi.eu/about-enfsi/members/.
Oversight Agreement 2023-25. Department of Justice (March 16, 2023). Forensic Science Ireland. URL: https://assets.gov.ie/251653/b61b9b8e-2b49-4b91-9d7b-f142a8a79ade.pdf.
Code of Ethics of a Forensic Expert. (December 30, 2014). "Independent Forensic Expertise of Ukraine" LLC. URL: https://ekspertiza.com.ua/uk/kodeks-etyky-sudovoho-eksperta. (in Ukrainian).
The Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine No. 4651-VI. (April 13, 2012). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text. (in Ukrainian).
Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine No. 1618-IV. (March 18, 2004). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text. (in Ukrainian).
Register of forensic examination methods. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. URL: https://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua/page/6. (in Ukrainian).
Simakova-Efremyan, E.B., Fedorenko, V.L., Sviridova, L.V. et al. (2021). Classification of forensic ex-aminations. E.B. Simakova-Efremyan (Ed.). Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian).
Code of Ukraine on administrative offenses No. 8073-Х. (December 7, 1984). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#n1981. (in Ukrainian).
The Criminal Code of Ukraine No. 2341-ІІІ. (March 5, 2001). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. (in Ukrainian).
Copyright (c) 2024 Наталія Нестор, Антон Полянський, Ігор Лущик
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
