Method for analyzing the vulnerability of water resources in an unstable environment based on the entropy approach

Keywords: vulnerability of water resources, connection entropy, change of environment, pairwise set analysis


Purpose. The synthesis of the method of analyzing the vulnerability of water resources based on the entropy of the connection based on the determination of the factors of the water system, considering the relationship between the anthropogenic socio-economic system and the "man-environment" system and the analysis of the transformation processes of the water system in a changing environment.

Results. The mechanism of vulnerability of water resources in a changing environment is analyzed. The structure of the vulnerability of water resources is established based on sensitivity, natural resistance and artificial adaptation by analyzing the four states of the water system: the sensitive state, the impaired state, the recovery state and the equilibrium state, and accompanying transformation processes. A method for analyzing the vulnerability of water resources based on contact entropy is proposed, which extends the concept of contact entropy. The degree of vulnerability of water resources to the changing environment can be divided into five levels with 11 indices: low (I), insignificant (II), moderate (III), high (IV) and extreme (V). Calculation of the contact entropy shows an approximate value of the contact entropy S with a range of (–1.314; 1.314). This interval is divided into five parts: [0.877; 1.314), [0.292; 0.877), [−0.292; 0.292), [−0.877; −0.292), (−1.314; − 0.877), indicating low (I), insignificant (II), moderate (III), high (IV) and excessive (V) degrees of vulnerability of water resources, respectively.

Conclusions. The state of a water system usually changes from impaired to restored due to natural factors, followed by a transition from a state of restoration to a state of equilibrium mainly due to artificial factors. The first is defined as natural resilience, and the second as artificial adaptation. The results of this mechanism offer a necessary understanding of the vulnerability of water resources in a changing environment, the mechanism of the transformation process between the four states is the focus of further research.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. L. Bezsonnyi , V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 6, Svobody Sqr., 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

PhD (Technical), Associate Professor of the Department of Environmental Safety and Environmental Education


Zhao, K.Q. (2000). Set Pair Analysis and Preliminary Application; China Science Technology Press: Hangzhou, China.

Turner, B.L., II; Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P.A., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J.X., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Polsky,C., Pulsipher, A., & Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 8074–8079.

Füssel, H.M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob. Environ. Chang., 17, 155–167.

Padowski, J.C., & Gorelick, S.M. (2014). Global analysis of urban surface water supply vulnerability. Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 104004.

Allouchea, N., Maananb, M., Gontaraa, M., Rollob, N., Jmala, I., & Bouria, S. (2017). A global risk ap-proach to assessing groundwater vulnerability. Environ. Model. Softw., 88, 168–182.

Khakhar, M., Ruparelia, J.P., &Vyas, A. (2017). Assessing groundwater vulnerability using GIS-based DRASTIC model for Ahmedabad district, India. Environ. Earth Sci., 76, 440.

Rushforth, R.R., & Ruddell, B.L. (2016). The vulnerability and resilience of a city’s water footprint: The case of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Water Resour. Res., 52, 2698–2714.

Martinez, S., Kralisch, S., Escolero, O., & Perevochtchikova, M. (2015). Vulnerability of Mexico City’s water supply sources in the context of climate change. J. Water Clim. Chang., 6, 518–533.

Padowski, J.C., & Jawitz, J.W. (2012). Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States. Water Resour. Res., 48.

Sullivan, C.A. (2011). Quantifying water vulnerability: A multi-dimensional approach. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 25, 627–640.

McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J., & White, K.S. (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Re-port of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK,.

Safi, A.S., Smith, W.J., & Liu, Z. (2016). Vulnerability to climate change and the desire for mitigation. J. Environ. Stud. Sci., 6, 503–514.

Liersch, S., Cools, J., Kone, B., Koch, H., Diallo, M., Reinhardt, J., Fournet, S., Aich, V., & Hattermann, F.F. (2013). Vulnerability of rice production in the Inner Niger Delta to water resources management under climate variability and change. Environ. Sci. Policy, 34, 18–33.

Yang, X.H., Sun, B.Y., Zhang, J., Li, M.S., He, J., Wei, Y.M., & Li, Y.Q. (2016). Hierarchy evaluation of water resources vulnerability under climate change in Beijing, China. Nat. Hazards, 84, 63–76.

Gain, A.K., Giupponi, C., & Renaud, F.G. (2012). Climate Change Adaptation and Vulnerability As-sessment of Water Resources Systems in Developing Countries: A Generalized Framework and a Fea-sibility Study in Bangladesh. Water, 4, 345–366.

Ionescu, C., Klein, R.J.T., Hinkel, J., Kumar, K.S.K., & Klein, R. (2009). Towards a Formal Framework of Vulnerability to Climate Change. Environ. Model. Assess., 14, 1–16.

Al-Saidi, M., Birnbaum, D., Buriti, R., Diek, E., Hasselbring, C., Jimenez, A., & Woinowski, D. (2016). Water Resources Vulnerability Assessment of MENA Countries Considering Energy and Virtual Water. Procedia Eng., 145, 900–907.

Shabbir, R., & Ahmad, S.S. (2016). Water resource vulnerability assessment in Rawalpindi and Islama-bad, Pakistan using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 28, 293–299.

Pan, Z., Jin, J., Wu, K., & Res, K.D. (2014). Earch on the Indexes and Decision Method of Regional Water Environmental System Vulnerability. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin, 23, 518–525.

Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mavh, K.J., Mastrabdrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., et al. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vul-nerability. Summaries, Frequently Asked Questions, and Cross-Chapter Boxes. A Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.

Hassan, R., Scholes, R., & Ash, N. (2005). Appendix D: Glossary. In Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current States and Trends, Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1, pp. 893–900.

Hartley, R.V. (1928) Transmission of Information. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 7, 535–563.

Schrödinger, E. (1944). What Is Life? The Physical Aspects of Living Cell, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 379–423.

De Luca, A., & Termini, S. (1972). A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets. Inf. Control., 20, 301–312.

Zhao, K. (1992) Study on set pair analysis and entropy. J. Zhejiang Univ., 6, 65–72.

Su, M.R., Yang, Z.F., & Chen, B. (2009). Set pair analysis for urban ecosystem health assessment. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 14, 1773–1780.

Wang, W., Jin, J., Ding, J., & Li, Y. (2009). A new approach to water resources system assessment—Set pair analysis method. Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci., 52, 3017–3023.

Kumar, K., & Garg, H. (2016). TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math., 1–11.

Pan, Z., Wang, Y., Jin, J., & Liu, X. (2017). Set pair analysis method for coordination evaluation in water resources utilizing conflict. Phys. Chem. Earth.

Pan, Z., Wu, C., & Jin, J. (2016). Set Pair Analysis Methods for Water Resource System Evaluation and Prediction, Science Press: Beijing, China,.

Jin, J., & Wei, Y. (2008). Generalized Intelligent Evaluation Method for Complex System and Its Ap-plication, Science Press: Beijing, China,.

Bezsonnyi, V. L., Tretyakov , O. V., Plyatsuk, L. D., & Nekos, A. N. (2022). Entropy approach to as-sessment of the ecological state of a water course. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series «Еcоlogy», (27), 6-19.

Bezsonnyi, V., Tretyakov, O., Sherstyuk, M., & Nekos, A. (2022). Thermodynamic aspects of the sys-tems approach in ecology. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series “Geology. Ge-ography. Ecology”, (57), 268-281.

Bezsonnyi, V.L. (2023). Methods of assessment of the ecological status of a water body based on the entropy-weighted index of water quality. Ecological Sciences: a scientific and practical journal. 2(47), 44–48.

How to Cite
Bezsonnyi , V. L. (2023). Method for analyzing the vulnerability of water resources in an unstable environment based on the entropy approach. Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, 39, 65-76.