Rural settlement as a factor of administrative and territorial changes (on the example of Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions)

Keywords: rural resettlement, territorial community, network of settlements, decentralization


Purpose: to analyze the features of rural settlement in Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions and to identify its influence on the formation and functioning of territorial communities and districts of these regions.

Methods. comparative-geographical, statistical, analytical method, structural-functional approach

Results: the rural settlement network of the Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions was analyzed from a socio-geographic point of view, taking into account the similarity of natural and geographical conditions, historical, ethno-geographical aspects of the formation of settlements and modern socio-spatial processes in the regions. It is noted that the regions have a number of common features of rural settlement, in particular, high density and average population of settlements in the plain part and zones of dispersed settlement in mountainous areas, which must be taken into account in the process of formation of territorial communities. It is noted that according to the results of the ATU reform in the regions, rural communities absolutely prevail. This will contribute to the preservation of the demographic and socio-economic potential of rural settlements - community centers, however, in remote peripheral and depressed areas, rural communities may not be able to cope financially and administratively given the limitations of their own resources. Possible positive and negative consequences of the impact of the reform on changes in inter-settlement relations, functions of settlements, and their further development are identified and summarized.

Conclusions: Intra-regional differences in rural settlement are an important factor in administrative-territorial changes and were taken into account in the process of formation of territorial communities and new districts. Most communities in both regions are rural; the settlements that became their centers received broad powers and prospects for development. In today's conditions, most rural communities cannot take advantage of the opportunities of decentralization due to the limited socio-economic potential of settlements. According to indicators of economic activity, these communities are mostly subsidized and require significant investment income. The development of rural areas will contribute to the strengthening of the grassroots link of the administrative-territorial system.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

O. I. Skliarska , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 41, Doroshenko St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor of the Department of Geography of Ukraine


Law of Ukraine "On Voluntary Association of Territorial Communities". Retrieved from

Kravtsiv, V.S., & Storonyanska, I.Z. (Eds.). (2020). Territorial communities in the context of decentralization: risks and mechanisms of development: monograph. Lviv. Retrieved from (in Ukrainian)

Migration movement of population by type of area 2002-2021, Transcarpathian region. Retrieved from:

Baranovsky, M. O. (2016). Demographic potential of the centers of territorial communities of the regions of Ukrainian Polissya as an important factor in the effectiveness of administrative-territorial reform. Region-2016: strategy of optimal development: Materials of the International scientific-practical conference, Kharkiv, November 10-11. 17-20. 1. (in Ukrainian).

Dnistriansky, M. S. (2014). Political geography of Ukraine: textbook. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

Dotsenko, A.I. (2003). Administrative-territorial structure and settlement in Ukraine. Kyiv. (in Ukraini-an)

Zastavetsʹka, L. (2013). Principles of formation and mechanisms of functioning of new territorial communities and settlement systems in the process of reforming the administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine. Bulletin of Chernivtsi University. Geography series, 673-674, 95-100. Retrieved from (in Ukrainian).

Decentralization in Ukraine. Territorial communities. Retrieved from

Ostapenko, P. (2020). Atlas of administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine. New district division and territorial communities: Kyiv. . (in Ukrainian)

Local budgets. Retrieved from:

Main Department of Statistics in Zakarpattia region. Retrieved from:

Main Department of Statistics in Chernivtsi region. Retrieved from:

Skliarska, O. (2011). Political and geographical processes in Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

Zayats; T.A. (Ed.). (2017). Transformation of rural settlement in Ukraine: a collection of monographs Ptukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Dzhaman, V.O. (2003). Regional settlement systems: demogeographical aspects. Chernivtsi. (in Ukrainian)

National composition of the population of Transcarpathian region and its linguistic features. (2003). Uzhhorod. (in Ukrainian)

National composition of the population of Chernivtsi region and its linguistic features.(2003). Chernivtsi, (in Ukrainian)

Resolution "On Amendments to the Methodology for the Formation of Capable Territorial Communities" of January 24, 2020. Retrieved from:

Skliarska, O. I. (2021). Reform of the administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine in the context of influence on the status and functions of settlements. Scientific notes of TNPU named after V. Hnatiuk. Series: Geography, 50 (1). 57- 64. (in Ukrainian)

Gakman, S.M., & Kruglashov, A.M. (2021). Conflict potential of Chernivtsi region in the conditions of administrative-territorial reform and socio-economic crisis: analytical report. Chernivtsi.. (in Ukrainian).

How to Cite
Skliarska , O. I. (2022). Rural settlement as a factor of administrative and territorial changes (on the example of Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions). Man and Environment. Issues of Neoecology, 38, 20-28.