Decarbonization as a multilateral political mechanism for carbon regulation
Abstract
Formulation of the problem. This article is devoted to the analysis of the current state and prospects of the decarbonization project and its role in foreign policy in the process of creating the emissions trading system and the mechanism of the new European system of taxation of imported goods that leave a large carbon footprint (Control Border Adjustment Mechanism, CBAM) (the so-called "carbon border"). The issues raised in this work correspond to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely: the fight against climate change (13 goals), which were adopted by the United Nations in 2015 as a universal call to action to reduce poverty, protect the planet and ensure that by 2030 all people live in peace and prosperity. It was analyzed that the EU institutions (Commission, Council or European Parliament) had the greatest impact on the organizational structure of the European Union emissions trading (STV).
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to analyze the role of decarbonization as a multilateral political mechanism of carbon regulation at the border.
Methods. Comparative, systemic, institutional research methods are used in the article.
Research results. Attempts by the European Parliament to significantly change the decentralized nature of the ETS have failed. Thus, the process of updating the ETS and the mechanism of the new European system of taxation of imported goods that leave a large carbon footprint corresponds to the main provisions of the intergovernmental approach. Decarbonization is a term used to remove or reduce carbon dioxide (СО2) emissions from the atmosphere. Decarbonization is achieved by switching to low-carbon energy sources. The project "Cross-Border Adjustment of the Carbon Tax Upon World Accession" makes it possible to avoid negative consequences for trade and can create a win-win situation - in economic, political and environmental terms. Documents reflecting the positions of the subjects and the course of the legislative process were used as primary materials. The research was conducted on the basis of the process tracking method. The article proves that the decisive confluence in the formation of the ETS design was the member states (the balance of interests and influence of the member states in the Council of the EU). The commission played a significant role as the author of the idea and moderator of compromises. The Commission and the European Parliament have on several occasions successfully blocked or softened Member State amendments that threatened to undermine the substance of emissions trading.
Conclusions. As the planet faces rising temperatures and more frequent extreme weather events, it is clear that our current infrastructure practices must evolve. To mitigate and adapt to climate change, sustainable infrastructure is not just an option; it is a necessity.
Downloads
References
UNDP (2017). The SDGs in action. Available at: https://www.undp.org/ukraine/sustainable-development-goals
Baluyeva O.V., Chinkulyak N.M. (2013). Cluster analysis of territories of Ukraine according to indicators of an-thropogenic loads on the surrounding natural environment. Efficient economy. 12. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/op=1&z=2574
Varlamova I.S. (2017). Theoretical approaches to defining the concept of "ecological safety". Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Economic Sciences". 23(2), 161–164.
Volkov, A.I. (2019). Prospects for Using of Decision Support Systems for Assessment and Control of Technogenic Pressure on the Environment. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Еcоlogy, (20), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2019-20-03
Kirova M.O. (2018). Experience of foreign countries regarding institutional provision of environmental safety: proposals for Ukraine. Balanced nature management. 1, 158–165.
Lychenko I.O. (2016). Environmental security problems of the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions and the organizational and legal basis of their solution. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic Na-tional University. Series "Legal Sciences". 845, 279–284.
Turchyn M.B. (2014). Ecological ethics in the paradigm of postmodernism: autoref. thesis... candidate Philos. Sci-ences: 09.00.07. Myroslava Bogdanivna Turchyn; Institute of Philosophy named after H.S. Skovorody of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv, 16.
Fesyanov P.O. State regulation of environmental safety at the regional level: experience of European countries. URL: http://academy.gov.ua/ej/ej13/txts/Fesyanov.pdf
Chugai A.V. (2020). Assessment of man-made load on environmental components of Odesa region. Environmental sciences. 28, 102–110.
Allen M., Bird S., Breslow S., Dolak N. (2017). Stronger together: strategies to protect local sovereignty, ecosys-tems, and place-based communities from the global fossil trade mar. Pol., 80, 168-176.
Bridge G., Bouzarovski S., Bradshaw M., Eyre N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Pol., 53, 331-340.
Fazey I., Schpke N., Caniglia G., Hodgson A., Kendrick I., Lyon C., et al. (2020). Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: visions of future systems and how to get there. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 70.
Geels F.W., Sovacool B., Schwanen T., Sorrell S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Ac-celerating innovation is as important as climate policy. Science, 357, 1242-1244.
Grubler A. (2012). Energy transitions research: insights and cautionary tales. Energy Pol., 50, 8-16.
Herring, H. (2009). National construction funds: solution problems consumption energy or decarbonization? To build rez. Inf., 37, 192-195.
Keohane Robert O., Jeff D. Colgan. Save the Environment, Save American Democracy How a Pro-Climate (2021). Vision Can Strengthen America's Social Fabric. Foreign Affairs. September 20. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-09-20/save-environment-save-american-democracy
Lempinen H. (2019). Arctic Energy and Social Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 29.
Norton L.S. (De) (2020). Constructing bridges for development and innovation: intercultural concerns regarding ICT4D Am. Behav. Sci., 64, 1921.
Richardson J., Nichols A., Henry T. (2012). Do transition towns have the potential to promote health and well-being? A health impact assessment of a transition town initiative. Publ. Health, 126, 982-989.
Sarrica M., Richter, M., Thomas S., Graham I., Mazzara B.M. (2018). Social approaches to energy transition cases in rural Italy, Indonesia and Australia: Iterative methodologies and participatory epistemologies. Energy Re-search & Social Science, 45, 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.001
Sovacool, B.K., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A. et al. (2019). Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions. Climatic Change, 155, 581–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7
Tàbara J. David, Pahl-Wostl Claudia (2007). Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecology and Society, 12, 2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267889
Weinstein M.P., Turner R. Eugene (2013). The global sustainability transition: it is more than changing light bulbs. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Pol., 9, 4-15.
Yang Y., Tilman D. (2020). Soil and root carbon storage is key to climate benefits of bioenergy crops. Biofuel Res. J., 26, 1143-1148. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2020.7.2.2
The European Green Course and the climate policy of Ukraine (2022): analyst. add. with. P. Ivanyuta, L. M. Yaku-shenko; in general ed. A. Yu. Smenkovskyi. Kyiv: NISD, 95.
Ineshu Acevedo, Davidson Michael RJenkins., Jesse D., Karplus Valerie J., Victor David G. (2020). How technology can save the planet. Foreign affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/paths-net-zero
Begon Michael, Townsend Colin R., Harper John L. (2006). Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, 738.
Climate change: Impacts on Japan. Nature Publishing Group. Available at: https://www.natureasia.com/ja-jp/advertising/sponsors/climate-change .
Framework Convention on Climate Change. UN. Paris, (2015). 12.12. FCCC/CP/2015/L9. 42.Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/rus/10r.pdf
Cavalcanti F. (2018) The main contradictions between countries in new climate agreement development / Journal of Public Economics 165, 201–216.
Сop26. Available at: https://ecopolitic.com.ua/news/abramovskij-rozpoviv-pro-cili-ukraini-na-klimatechnij-konferencii-cop26-2/Ecopolitic.com.ua
About "Goals of sustainable development of Ukraine for the period up to 2030" (2019): Decree of the President of Ukraine dated September 30, 722/2019. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/722/2019
IPCC, Fifth Assessment Report, Climate Change, 2013-2014, 1-3. UNEP 2014. The Adaptation Gap Report 2014. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Nairobi, 88.
Wecoop (2021). Available at: https://wecoop.eu https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/
HBB2 - Hemoglobin subunit beta-2. UniProt. Available at: https://www.uniprot.org/
European-green-deal. (2020). Available at: https://european-green-deal/delivering-european-green-deal_en
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
