Primary physical mechanism of different magnetic fields action on roots of some plants

  • N. V. Sheykina National University of Pharmacy, 53 Pushkinska Str., 61002, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-3455
  • N. I. Bogatina B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics & Engineering of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 47 Nauki Ave., 61102, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3783-8320
Keywords: combined magnetic field, alternative magnetic field, permanent magnetic field, cyclotron frequency of ion, starch grains, piezoelectricity, hydronium, free path of ion

Abstract

Background: Though the magnetic field action on biological object is proved now by many experiments it cannot be explained. The counterarguments are the small value of magnetic induction, that is effective for static magnetic field and the small value of ions free path length for ion cyclotron resonance presence.  

Objectives of the article were to generalize all the results that had been obtained before in static, alternative and combined magnetic fields and to explain all results by one and the same primary physical mechanism.

Materials and methods that were used to obtain experimental results were based on the using of well reproducible magnetic conditions. For this purpose 3 lays µ-metal shield and superconductive shield with warm volume were used. The artificial magnetic field was created in the shield. The objects of the investigation were roots of cress, maize and pea. Their gravitropic reaction was studied.

Results and discussion: All experimental results were compared with the theories and calculations maid before and following from the three mechanisms proposed below. 

It was shown that there were three physical primary mechanisms that could lead to effect of low frequency alternative and combined magnetic fields and permanent magnetic field on gravitropic reaction in plants. All of them depended on the relative location of roots, gravity and components of permanent and alternative magnetic fields between themselves. The first mechanism is based on the classic model of the rotation of ions in the plane that is perpendicular to the magnetic field direction or precession of magnetic moments round the direction of magnetic field vector. The second mechanism is connected with the piezoelectric properties of starch grain (porous piezoelectricity). This property of starch may create the change in the moving of starch grains in alternative and combined magnetic fields, and even in static one. The third mechanism is caused by the phase transition in water created by weak combined or alternative magnetic fields.

Conclusions: The comparison of effects of these three mechanisms between themselves allowed choosing the most possible one. It was shown that the first mechanism was preferred. Only the first mechanism can explain the dependence of observed effects on magnetic field direction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bogatina, N.I., Litvin, V.M., Travkin, M.P. (1986.) Possible mechanisms of action of magnetic, gravitropic and electric fields on biological objects, the analogies in their action. Electronic treatment of materials, (1), 64-67.

2. Bogatina, N.I., Verkin, B.I., Kulabuhov, V.N. [et al.] (1979) Opredelenie poroga chuvstvitel'nosti prorostkov i kornej pshenicy k velichine magnitnogo polja. Fiziologija rastenij, (26, №3), 620-625. (in Russian)

3. Merkis, A.I. (1973) Geotropic reaction of plants. Vil’nyus. (in Russian)

4. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V., Kordjum, E.L. (2006) Izmenenija gravitropicheskoj reakcii, vyzvannye postojannym magnitnym polem. Bіofіzichnij vіsnik, (17(1)), 78– 82. (in Russian)

5. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V. (2013) Vlijanie peremennogo magnitnogo polja na gravitropicheskuju reakciju rastenij pri jekranirovanii postojannoj sostavljajushhej magnitnogo polja. Rol' chastot Shumana. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo Serija «Biologija, himija», (26, №3), 27 – 34. (in Russian)

6. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V., Kordjum, E.L. (2012) Vlijanie orientacii kornej kress-salata i kukuruzy otnositel'no kombinirovannogo magnitnogo polja na izmenenie ih gravitropicheskoj reakcii. Jeksperiment i novaja gipoteza, mehanizm adaptacii. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo Serija «Biologija, himija», (25 , № 2), 16-30. (in Russian)

7. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V., Kordjum, E.L. (2012) Maize and cress roots orientation in combined magnetic field change roots gravitropic reaction response on its action. Experiment and new hypothesis . Adaptation mechanism. Proceedings of V1 International Congress “Low and superlow magnetic fields and radiation in biology and medicine, Saint-Petersburg, 02-06 July 2012 (pp 73-82). ISBN 5-86456-007-3. Saint-Petersburg : VNLU.

8. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V. (2014) Influence of different relative orientation of static and alternative magnetic fields and cress roots on their gravitropic reaction. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo Serija «Biologija, himija», (27, №1), 24-28.

9. Sheykina, N.V., Bogatina, N.I., Kordjum, E.L. (2005) Vlijanie kombinirovannogo magnitnogo polja na gravitropicheskuju reakciju rastenij i spektr jelektromagnitnogo izluchenija, generiruemogo imi. Radiofizika i jelektronika, (10, №2), 331 – 335. (in Russian)

10. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V., Kordjum, E.L. (2012) Activation of metal ions and biologically active compounds ions action by combined magnetic field. Proceedings of V1 International Congress “Low and superlow magnetic fields and irradiation in biology and medicine, Saint-Petersburg, 02-06 July 2012 (90-98). ISBN 5-86456-007-3. Saint-Petersburg : VNLU.

11. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V., Kordjum, E.L., Karachevcev, V.A. (2002) Gravitropicheskaja reakcija rastenij v kombinirovannom (postojannom i peremennom) magnitnom pole. Dopovіdі NAN Ukraїni, (4), 176 – 179. (in Russian)

12. Kordyum, E.L., Bogatina, N.I., Kalinina, Ya. M., Sheykina, N.V. (2005) A weak combined magnetic field changes root gravitropism. Advances in Space Research,. (36, №7), 1229 – 1236.

13. Kordjum, E.L., Sobol', M.A., Kalіnіna, Ja.M., Bogatina, N.І., Sheykіna, N.V. (2009) Bіologіchna dіja kombіnovanogo magnіtnogo polja na gravіtropіchnu reakcіju korenja lepidium Sativum L..Ukr. botan. zhurn., (65, №1), 141-157. (in Ukrainian)

14. Vincze, L., Szasz, G., Liboff, A. (2006) New theoretical treatment of ion resonance phenomena. Bioelectromagnetics, (29), 380-386.

15. Bingi, V.N. (2016) A primary physical mechanism of biological effects of weak magnetic fields. Biophysics, (61, No1). P. 201-208.

16. Del Giudice, E., Fleichmann, H., Preparata, G., Talpo, G. (2002) On the “unreasonable”effects on ELF magnetic fields upon a system of ions. Bioelectromagnetics, (23), 522-553.

17. Sheykina, N.V., Bogatina, N.I., Kordjum, E.L. (2007) Zavisimost' gravitropicheskoj reakcii kress-salata ot amplitudy peremennoj sostavljajushhej kombinirovannogo magnitnogo polja, Bіofіzichnij Vіsnik (Vіsnik Harkіvs'kogo universitetu), (18(1)), 78 – 90. (in Russian)

18. Bogatina, N.I., Sheykina, N.V. (2014) Role of Hydronium ions in biological effects of weak combined magnetic fields. Physics of Alive, (21, №1-2), 43-45.

19. Grimaldi, S., Lisi, A., Ledda, M., D'Emilia, E., Liboff, A., Giuliani, L., Foletti, A. (2016) Weak-field H3O(+) ion cyclotron resonance alters water refractive index. Journal: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, (001R.2), 1-24.

20. Bogatina N.I., Sheykina N.V. (2013) Effect of alternative magnetic field on plants gravitropic reaction under the conditions of absence of static components of magnetic field. X INTERNATIONAL CRIMEAN CONFERENCE «COSMOS AND BIOSPHERE», 23 – 28 September 2013, Koktebel, Crimea, Ukraine. VNLU. (in English)

21. Sydorov, A.V. (2008) Fyzyolohyia vnutrykletochnoi kommunykatsyy. Mynsk: BHU. (in Russian)
Published
2017-12-21
Cited
How to Cite
Sheykina, N. V., & Bogatina, N. I. (2017). Primary physical mechanism of different magnetic fields action on roots of some plants. Biophysical Bulletin, 2(38), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-3810-2017-38-04
Section
Action of physical agents on biological objects