Computer simulation of complexation of actinocin derivative and double stranded polyribocytidylic acid

  • A.V. Shestopalova Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics NAS of Ukraine
  • K.V. Miroshnychenko Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: molecular docking, Monte Carlo method, double stranded polyribocytidylic acid, actinocin derivative

Abstract

Relying on the results of molecular docking and on the known experimental data regarding complexation of actinocin derivative (ActIII) and double stranded polyribocytidylic acid (polyrC), five most probable ActIII - polyrC complexes are obtained. In these complexes target-ligand interactions are minimal and intermolecular hydrogen bonds are formed between donor-acceptor groups of ActIII and polyrC. Cytosine groups and/or oxygen atoms of sugarphosphate backbone of polyrC participate in hydrogen bonding with NH2, C=O, NH-groups of phenoxazone chromophore, and aminoalkyl side chains of ActIII. The influence of solvent-water molecules on the structure of complexes obtained using molecular docking is determined by the Monte Carlo method. The simulation is carried out taking into account 800 water molecules. It is shown, that water molecules can additionally stabilize polynucleotide target-ligand complexes by forming bridges between their donor-acceptor groups. Based on the analysis of simulation and experimental results, one of the ActIII - polyrC complexes is selected as the most probable one.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A.V. Shestopalova, Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics NAS of Ukraine

12 Acad. Proskura str, 61085, Kharkov, Ukraine

K.V. Miroshnychenko, Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics NAS of Ukraine

12 Acad. Proskura str, 61085, Kharkov, Ukraine

References

1. Семенов М.А., Круглова Е.Б., Духопельников Е.В. и др // Вісн. ХДУ №528. Біофізичний вісник. 2001. Вип.2(9). С.33-39.

2 Больбух Т.В., Близнюк Ю.Н, Круглова Е.Б. и др. // Вісн. ХНУ №637. Біофізичний вісник. 2004. Вип.1(14). С.38-42.

3. Prescott B., Gamache R., Livramdo J., Thomas G.J. // Biopolymers. 1974. V.13, N 10. P. 1821-1845.

4. Yang J.T., Samejima T // Prog.Nid.Acid.Res.Mol.Biol. 1976. V.9. N 2. P.223-300.

5. Leslie A.G.W., Arnott S. // J. Mol.Bi 1978. V.l 19. P.399-414.

6. Langridge R.A., Rich A. // Nature.1963. V.198. N 4882. P.725-728.

7.Cornell W.D., Cieplak P., Bayly C.I. et al. // J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1995. V.117. P.5179-5192.


8. Jorgensen W.L., Chandrasekhas J., Madura J.D., Impey R.W., Klein M.L. // J. Chem. Phys. 1983. V.79. P.926-935

9. Morris G.M., Goodsell D.S., Halliby R.S. et al. // J. Comput. Chem. 1998. V.19. P. 1639-1651.

1O. Mehler E.L., Solmajer T. //Protein Engineering. 1991. V.4. P.903-910

11. Stouten P.F.W., Frommel C, Nakamura H. et. al. // Mol. Simulation. 1993. V.10. P.97-120

12. Metropolis N., Rosenhluth A.W., Rosenbluth M. N., Teller A.N., Teller E. //J.Chem.Phys. 1953. V.21. P.1087-1092.

13. Danilov V.I., Zheltovsky N.V., Slyusarchuk O.N., Poltev V.I., Alderfer J.L. // J.Biomol.Struct. Dyn. 1997. V. l5. P. 69-80.

14. Maleev V., Semenov M., Kashpur V., Bolbukh T., Shestopalova A., Anishchenko D. // Journal of Mol. Structure.2002. V.605. P.51-61.

15. Maleev V.Ya., Semenov M.A., Kruglova E.B., Bolbukh T.V, Gasan A.I., Bereznyak E.G., Shestopalova A.V. // Journal of Molecular Structure. 2003. V.645. P. 145-158.

16. Teplukhin A.V., Malenkov G.G., Poltev V.I. // J. Biomol. Struct.Dyn. 1998. V.16. N 2. P.289-300

17. Журкин В.Б., Полтев В.И., Флорентьев В.Л. // Мол.биол. 1980. Т.Н. Вып.5. С11116-1130.

18. Poltev V. L, Groklina T.I., Malenkov G.G. // J.Biomol. StructDyn. 1984. V.2. N 3. P.413-429.

19. Qu X., Chaires B. Hydration changes for DNA intercalation reactions. //J.Amer.Chem.Soc. 2001. V.123. P. 1-7.

20. Breusegem S.Y., Sadat-Ebrahimi S.E., Douglas K.T., Bichenkova E.V., Clegg R.M., Loontiens F.G. // J.Med.Chem. 2001.V.44. P. 2503-2506.
Published
2005-06-06
Cited
How to Cite
Shestopalova, A., & K.V. Miroshnychenko, K. (2005). Computer simulation of complexation of actinocin derivative and double stranded polyribocytidylic acid. Biophysical Bulletin, 1(15), 62-67. Retrieved from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/biophysvisnyk/article/view/18105