Polyamory: definition, forms, motives for engaging

Keywords: sexual revolution, polyamory, consensus non-monogamy, motives for engaging in polyamory, forms of polyamory

Abstract

The article examines the issue of polyamory in sociological and psychological discourse. It is emphasized that the phenomenon of polyamory is one of the consequences of the transformation of marital and family relations in the 20th century. It is noted that the relevance of the article is related to the revitalization of the discussion of polyamory both at the level of everyday discourse and among foreign scientists; discussions around polyamory as an alternative to monogamy in translated publications on sexological education for teenagers. Polyamory is considered by the author as one of the forms of consensual non-monogamy, that is, such relationships and sexual practices when people have more than one sexual/romantic partner with the mutual informed consent of all participants. The differences of such forms of consensual non-monogamy as polyamory and open relationships, "swing", "relationship anarchy" are discussed. It is noted that, in addition to the informed consent of all participants, polyamory is characterized by a characteristic focus on building long-term romantic relationships. The author considers the forms of polyamory according to K. Labriola: the primary/secondary model and multiple primary partners model. The study of the motives for engaging in polyamory by Slovak authors Hnatkovičová D., Bianchi G. is analyzed in detail. Motives for engaging in polyamory are discussed, such as meeting needs that were not met in monogamous relationships, personal growth and maintaining autonomy, identity development, expression of political values, exploration of LGBTIQ+ identities, desire for sexual diversity, need to belong to a community, and psychodynamic reasons. A conclusion is made about the need for further research on this issue, taking into account the liberalization of sexual morality and the further probable spread of polyamory practices in Western Europe and the USA.

Downloads

Author Biography

Oleksandr Zubariev , V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Svobody Sq. 4, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

PhD in sociology, Department of Sociology

References

/

References

Giddens A. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford University Press. 1992. 212 p.

Kon I. Einführung in die Sexologie. Verlag: Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein. 1985. 376 p.

Griffin G. Marriage. A Dictionary of Gender Studies. Oxford University Press. URL: https://www-oxfordreference-com.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780191834837.001.0001/acref-9780191834837-e-245. (Last accessed: 26.01.2022)

Аберкромби Н. Брак. Социологический словарь. М.: ЗАО «Издательство «Экономика», 2004. 620 с.

Hnatkovičová D., Bianchi G. Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships. Sexologies. 2022. 31 (3). Pp. 184-194.

Brink S. From free love to safe sex. 2006. URL: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jun-05-he-aids5-story.html (Last accessed: 26.01.2022)

Віттон Х. Про секс. То як, поговоримо? Київ: Книголав, 2022. 352 с.

Губарєва О. Феномен поліаморії в українському суспільстві. Матеріали Міжнародної конференції студентів, аспірантів та молодих учених «Шевченківська весна – 2020». К.: Видавництво «Наукова столиця». 2021. С. 19-22.

Злобіна Т. Більше любові: політична критика моногамії та низові практики поліамурності. Спільне. 2013. URL: https://genderindetail.org.ua/season-topic/seksualnist/bil-she-lyubovi-politichna-kritika-monogamii-ta-nizovi-praktiki-poliamurnosti-134296.html (Last accessed: 01.26.2022)

Яцина О. Ф. Трансформації практик шлюбно-сімейного партнерства та батьківства: постмодерні реалії: монографія. Ужгород: Карпати. 2018. 280 с.

Aguilar J. Situational Sexual Behaviors: The Ideological Work of Moving toward Polyamory in Communal Living Groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2013. 42(1), С. 104-129.

Balzarini R. N., Dharma C., Kohut T., Campbell L., Holmes B. M., Lehmiller J. J., Harman J. J. Demographic comparison of American individuals in polyamorous and monogamous relationships. Journal of Sex Research. Advanced online publication. 2019. 56(6) Pp. 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.14743

Barker M. This is my partner and this is my partner's partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 2005. 18:1. Pp. 75-88.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590523107

Domínguez G. E., Pujol J., Motzkau J. F., Popper M. Suspended transitions and affective orderings: From troubled monogamy to liminal polyamory. Theory and Psychology. 2017. 27(2). Pp. 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317700289

Grunt-Mejer K., Chańska W. “How Do They Even Know They Love?” The Image of Polyamory in Polish Expert Discourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2020. 49. Pp. 2829-2847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01787-8

Klesse C. Polyamory and its ‘Others’: Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy. Sexualities. 2006. 9(5), Pp. 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069986

Melissa E. Mitchell, Kim Bartholomew, Rebecca J. Cobb. Need Fulfillment in Polyamorous Relationships. The Journal of Sex Research. 2014. 51:3. Pp. 329-339.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.742998

Ritchie A., Barker M. There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities. 2006. 9 (5). Pp. 584-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069987

Wood J., De Santis C., Desmarais S., Milhausen R. Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2021. 50(4). Pp. 1253-1272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01873-x

Moors A.C., Gesselman A.N., Garcia J.R. Desire, familiarity, and engagement in polyamory: Results from a national sample of single adults in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. 12 (2021). Pp. 1-12.

Scoats R., Campbell C. What do we know about consensual non-monogamy? Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101468

Hnatkovičová D., Bianchi G. Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships. Sexologies. 2022. 31 (3). Pp. 184-194.

Labriola K. Love in Abundance. A counselor’s Guide to open Relationships. Published by Greenery Press. 2010. P. 193.

Griffin, G. Serial monogamy. A Dictionary of Gender Studies. 2017. Oxford University Press. URL: https://www-oxfordreference-com.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780191834837.001.0001/acref-9780191834837-e-348 (Last accessed: 26.01.2022)

Yashkina D. A sociological perspective on the phenomenon of solo-living in Eastern Europe: An attempt at conceptualization. Eastern Review. 9. Pp. 169-187.

Maslow A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review. 1943. 50. Pp. 370-396.

Griffin G. Political lesbianism. A Dictionary of Gender Studies. Oxford University Press. 2017. URL: https://www-oxfordreference-com.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780191834837.001.0001/acref-9780191834837-e-299 (Last accessed: 26.01.2022)

Bowlby J. Attachment and loss Attachment. 1969. Basic Books, New York.

Chernus L.A. Sexual mate-swapping: A comparison of “normal” and “clinical” populations. Clinical Social Work Journal. 1980. 8 (2). Pp. 120-130.

O’Connor M. Polyamory – a romantic solution to wanderlust? European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling. 2019. 21:3-4, Pp. 217-230 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2019.1652200

Барт Р. Фрагменти мови закоханого. Львів: Незалежний культурологічний журнал «Ї», 2006. 283 с.

Published
2022-06-29
How to Cite
Zubariev , O. (2022). Polyamory: definition, forms, motives for engaging. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, (27), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2022-27-05
Section
Статті