Mikhail Dragomanov on Consequences of Violating the Principle of Separation of Church and State

  • Ekatetina Bataeva Zhytomyr Institute of Economics and Humanities of the University «Ukraine», 18, Vilskyi Shlyach Str., Zhytomyr, 10020, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-4817
Keywords: Church, state, repression, freedom of conscience, democracy

Abstract

The article considers the problems of relations between the Church and the state in the classical sociological theory of M. Drahomanov and modern sociology. In the Western sociology of religion, considerable attention is paid to distinguishing the contexts of state and Сhurch practices, which can be compatible or incompatible with democracy. Compatible with democracy is a form of interaction between Church and state that ensures the protection of religious freedom and religious self-expression of all religious organizations and excludes discrimination based on religion. The negative consequences of the violation of the «principle of separation of Church from the State» described in the works of M. Drahomanov are analyzed. The socio-cultural effects of state intervention in the affairs of the Church at the level of society are investigated: violation of the principle of freedom of conscience, religious repression, forced unification of religions, and migration of believers as a result of repression by the state. It is emphasized that the violation of the principle of freedom of conscience contributes to the formation of an imposed and inauthentic identity of the individual, the growth of religious conformity, and the strengthening of «categorical inequality» in society. The social consequences of religious discrimination are analyzed: the growth of mass tension and frustration in society, the conflict between different Church communities, and the weakening of the effect of cohesion. The negative consequences of the violation of the «principle of separation of Church from the state» for the state Church are demonstrated: weakening of influence in society, rejection of the intellectuals, and latent atheism of the population. It is emphasized that to neutralize these negative effects, it is necessary to observe the constitutional principle of separation of the Church from the state. It was concluded that the separation of Church from state should contribute to the establishment of interreligious tolerance and understanding in society.

Downloads

Author Biography

Ekatetina Bataeva, Zhytomyr Institute of Economics and Humanities of the University «Ukraine», 18, Vilskyi Shlyach Str., Zhytomyr, 10020, Ukraine

Dr Habil. (Philosophy), Professor, Department of Social Rehabilitation Technologies

References

/

References

Democracy Index 2021. The China Challenge. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited. URL: https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/eiu-democracy-index-2021.pdf

Turner B. Religion in Liberal and Authoritarian States. Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology; edit. by Jack Barbalet, Adam Possamai and Bryan S. Turner. London: Anthem Press, 2011, pp. 25-43.

Chavura S. The Secularization Thesis and the Secular State: Reflections with Special Attention to Debates in Australia. Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology; edit. by Jack Barbalet, Adam Possamai and Bryan S. Turner. London: Anthem Press, 2011, pp. 65-92.

Fox J. Separation of Religion and State in Stable Christian Democracies: Fact or Myth? Journal of Law, 2012. 1, Pp. 60-94 DOI 10.1163/221248112X638145

Fox J. Religious Discrimination in Christian-Majority Democracies from 1990 to 2014. Politics and Religion Journal, 2019. 13(2), Pp.285-308. DOI 10.54561/prj1302285f

Driessen M. Religion, State, and Democracy: Analyzing Two Dimensions of Church-State Arrangements. Politics and Religion, 2010. Vol. 3, Pp.55-80. doi:10.1017/S1755048309990435

Grim B. J., Finke R. International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2006. Vol. 2, Pp.1-40.

Pollack D., Pickel G. Church-State Relations and the Vitality of Religion in European Comparison. In: Gert Pickel, Olaf Muller (eds.) Church and Religion in Contemporary Europe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 2009, Pp.145-166.

Fox J. A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 234 р.

Fox J., Flores D.L. Religions, Constitutions, and the State: A Cross-National Study. The Journal of Politics, 2009. 71. Pp. 1499-1513. DOI 10.1017/S0022381609990053

Батаєва К. Проблема церковно-державних відносин у соціології релігії М.Драгоманова. Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг, 2015. № 2, С.164-174.

Історія української соціології: навчальний посібник; за заг. ред. К. Батаєвої, В. Бурлачука, В. Степаненка. Київ: Кондор, 2018. 392 с.

Драгоманов М. П. Из истории отношений между церковью и государством в Западной Европе. Знание. 1876. № 8. С. 1-63.

Robbers G. State and Church in the European Union. In: Robbers, G., State and Church in the European Union, Baden Baden, Germany: Nomos, 2005, pp. 577-589.

Sandberg R. and Doe C. N. Church-State relations in Europe. Religion Compass, 2007. Vol. 1(5), Pp. 561-578. DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00040.x

Beckford J. Religion in Prisons and in Partnership with the State. In: Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology; edit. by Jack Barbalet, Adam Possamai and Bryan S. Turner. London: Anthem Press, 2011, pp. 43-64.

Beaufort, Fleur de, Schie, Patrick van (eds.) Separation of church and state in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: European Liberal Forum, 2012. 167 p.

Zrinšcˇak S. Church, State and Society in Post-communist Europe. In: Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology; edit. by Jack Barbalet, Adam Possamai and Bryan S. Turner. London: Anthem Press, 2011, pp. 157-184.

Sandberg R. Church-state relations in Europe: from legal models to an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Religion in Europe, 2008. Vol. 1 (3), Pp. 329-352. DOI 10.1163/187489208X336560

Драгоманов М. Борьба за духовную власть и свободу совести в XVI-XVII вв. Вибране. Київ, 1991. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/drag/drag.htm

Marcia J. E. Identity in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 1980. Vol.9(11), Pp.159–187.

King B. Existential sociology. Historical Developments and Theoritical Approaches in Sociology; in ed. Charles Crothers, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), 2010.

Tilly C. Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 234 p.

Spivak G. Can the Subaltern Speak? London: Macmillan Education, 1988.

Jensen S. Othering, identity formation and agency. Qualitative Studies, 2011. 2(2), Pp. 63-78. DOI 10.7146/qs.v2i2.5510

Brons L. Othering, an Analysis. Transcience. 2015. Vol. 6(1), Pp.69-90.

Udah H. Searching for a Place to Belong in a Time of Othering. Social Science, 2019. 8, 297. DOI 10.3390/socsci8110297

Дейнеко О. Соціальний капітал та соціальна згуртованість: особливості співвідношення та розмежування концептів. Габітус. Випуск 24. Т. 1. 2021. pp. 25-31. DOI https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5208.2021.24.1.4

Published
2022-06-29
How to Cite
Bataeva, E. (2022). Mikhail Dragomanov on Consequences of Violating the Principle of Separation of Church and State. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, (27), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.26565/2077-5105-2022-27-03
Section
Статті