Post-military transit of the identity of ATO/OOS participants: factor conditioning
Abstract
The article considers the process of military-to-civilian transit of the identity of Ukrainian participants in hostilities in the area of anti-terrorist operation/ united forces operation. Emphasis is placed on the peculiarities of transit and the factors influencing its karakter, given the analytical categories of phenomenological constructivism of P. Berger and T. Lukman, as well as the theory of A. Schutz. Particular attention is paid to the sociological conceptualization of the phenomenon of military identity of ATO / UFO participants. The content of the concepts “post-military identity transit” and “military identity” and the ratio of the respective phenomena are analyzed. Based on the analysis and rethinking of the ideas of A. Schutz, P. Berger and T. Lukman, as well as the identification of key factors and actors influencing the post-military identity transit of ATO / OOS participants, the phenomena of military identity and military-to-civilian transit of identity are conceptualized. It is emphasized that the military identity is constructed in the process of communication between the participants of the interaction. It is noted that specific practices acquired as a result of participation in hostilities appear in the life of the ATO / OOS participant as hidden knowledge that is reproduced outside the military environment and becomes an effective way of constructing reality. Such groups of ATO / OOS participants as citizens who have chosen military service as a profession have been singled out; mobilized to the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) or the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) (6 waves of mobilization during 2014-2015); as well as volunteers who participated in battalions and other armed formations that are not part of the active army of Ukraine. The thesis is that military-to-civilian transit of the identity of the representatives of these groups will differ due to different experience of recruitment to the Armed Forces or other armed formations of Ukraine, differences in the conditions of stay in the combat area and so on. The key factors influencing the post-military transit of the identity of combatants, constructing and reconstructing the military identity, namely: contrast of everyday life in the war zone and everyday life of peace, return to comfort, superior attitude of ATO / OOS participants to civilians, orientations, differences in perceptions of conflict, family and military fraternity. It is emphasized that the theoretical provisions, generalizations and conclusions presented in the paper, as well as the author's hypotheses can be used in further scientific and practical studies of this and related topics, as well as for developing state programs of social integration of combatants into peaceful life.
Downloads
References
/References
В Україні на обліку майже 370 тисяч учасників бойових дій. Укрінформ. 18.09.2019. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-ato/2782328-v-ukraini-majze-370-tisac-ucasnikiv-bojovih-dij.html.
Закон України «Про військовий обов'язок і військову службу» № 2232-XI від 04.11.2018. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2232-12
Закон України «Про статус ветеранів війни, гарантії їх соціального захисту» № 3551-XI від 25.07.2018 URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3551-12/paran42
Woodward, R., Jenkings K. Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Military Personnel. Sociology. 2011. №45(2). Pp. 252-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394016
Smith R. T., True G. Warring Identities: Identity Conflict and the Mental Distress of American Veterans of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Society and Mental Health. 2014. № 4(2). P. 147-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869313512212
Аrtemenko A. The concept of «veteran» in modern military sociology. Znanstvena Misel journal, 2020. Vol.1. Issue 48. Pp. 39-45.
Артеменко А., Батаева Е. Концепт милитарной идентичности в современной социологии. Вісник Харківського нац. ун-ту імені В. Н. Каразіна серія «Соціологічні дослідження сучасного суспільства: методологія, теорія, методи», 2018. Вип. 40. С.29-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2018-40-03
Артеменко А., Батаева Е. Концептуализация транзита милитарной идентичности в современной социологии. Вісник Національного технічного університету України «Київський політехнічний інститут». Політологія. Соціологія. Право», 2018. № 3(39).С.19-26.
Даниленко О. Інтерпретація ідей А. Шюца при дослідженні ситуації солдата, який повертається додому, в сучасній Україні. Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. 2018. № 1. С. 118-133.
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М.: Медиум, 1995. 323 с.
Blackburn D. Transitioning from Military to Civilian Life: Examining the Final Step in a Military Career. [online] Canadian Military Journal. 2016. №16(4). P. 53-61. http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vol16/no4/PDF/CMJ164Ep53.pdf
Transition From the Military Into Civilian Life: An Exploration of Cultural Competence / L. Cooper et. al. Armed Forces & Society. 2017. № 44(1). 22 p. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X16675965.
Шютц А. Возвращающийся домой / пер. с нем. и англ. В. Г. Николаева, С. В. Ромашко, Н. М. Мирновой // Избранное: мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. C.550-556.
Ahern J., Worthen M., Masters J., Lippman S.A., Ozer E.J., Moos R. (2015) The Challenges of Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans’ Transition from Military to Civilian Life and Approaches to Reconnection. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0128599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128599
Макеєв С., Оксамитна С. Вступ: визначати стан суспільства і давати йому ім’я. Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. 2016. № 4. С. 201-210. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stmm_2016_4_14.
Demers, A.L. (2011). When Veterans Return: The Role of Community in Reintegration. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16, 160 - 179. DOI: 10.1080/15325024.2010.519281
Шюц А. Структура повседневного мышления / пер. с нем. и англ. В. Г. Николаева, С. В. Ромашко, Н. М. Мирновой // Избранное: мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. 1054 с.
Эриксон Э. Г. Идентификация: юность и кризис / пер. с англ. М.: Прогресс, 1996. 342 с.
Almost 370,000 combatants are registered in Ukraine. Ukrinform. 18.09.2019. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-ato/2782328-v-ukraini-majze-370-tisac-ucasnikiv-bojovih-dij.html.
Law of Ukraine "On military binding and military service" No. 2232-XI dated 04.11.2018. http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2232-12
Law of Ukraine "On the status of war veterans, guarantees of their social defense" No. 3551-XI dated July 25, 2018. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3551-12/paran42
Woodward, R., Jenkings K. (2011). Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Military Personnel. Sociology. №45(2). Pp. 252-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394016
Smith, R.T., True G. (2014). Warring Identities: Identity Conflict and the Mental Distress of American Veterans of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Society and Mental Health. № 4(2). P. 147-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869313512212
Аrtemenko, A. (2020) The concept of «veteran» in modern military sociology. Znanstvena Misel journal. Vol.1. Issue 48. Pp. 39-45.
Bataeva, E., & Artemenko, A. (2018). The concept of military identity in modern sociology. Visnyk of V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series «Sociological studies of contemporary societ», 40, 29–35.
Bataeva, E., & Artemenko, A. (2018). Conceptualization of transit military identity in modern sociology. Visnik National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute". Politology. Sociology. Law”, 3(39), 19–26.
Danilenko, O. (2018). Interpretation of the ideas of A. Schutz during the follow-up the situation of a soldier who turns home, in modern Ukraine. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 1, 118–133.
Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge.
Blackburn, D. (2016) Transitioning from Military to Civilian Life: Examining the Final Step in a Military Career. Canadian Military Journal. №16(4). P. 53-61. http://www.journal.forces.gc.ca/vol16/no4/PDF/CMJ164Ep53.pdf
Cooper, L. et. al. (2017) Transition From the Military Into Civilian Life: An Exploration of Cultural Competence. Armed Forces & Society. № 44(1). 22 p. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X16675965.
Schutz, A. (1976). The Homecomer. In: Brodersen, A. (eds) Collected Papers II. Phaenomenologica, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1340-6_5
Ahern, J., et. al. (2015) The Challenges of Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans’ Transition from Military to Civilian Life and Approaches to Reconnection. PLoS ONE. 10(7): e0128599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128599
Sergiy Makeev, S., Oksamytna, S. (2016) Intro: sign the camp of suspension and give you the name. Sociology: Theory, Methods and Marketing. №4. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stmm_2016_4_14.
Demers, A.L. (2011). When Veterans Return: The Role of Community in Reintegration. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16, 160 - 179. DOI: 10.1080/15325024.2010.519281
Schutz, A. (2004) The structure of everyday thinking. transl. with English. V. G. Nikolaeva, S. V. Romashko, N. M. Mirnova. Selected: the world glowing with meaning. M.: ROSSPEN.
Erikson, E. (1996) Identification: youth and crisis. transl. from English. M.: Progress, 342 p.