«Being Together» in Pandemic Conditions: Social Cohesion Challenges of the Contemporary Ukrainian Society
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the analysis of the Ukrainian society social cohesion challenges in the pandemic conditions of digitally mediated interactions. Based on the results of qualitative sociological research, as well as a secondary analysis of the results of other sociological studies and statistics data, the author explores the phenomenon of social cohesion in the unity of three social levels of its presence - macro, meso and micro. The study has shown the dialectical nature of social cohesion and the opposite tendencies of its reproduction at different social levels – inner circle, professional communities and society as a whole. In the macro-social perspective, the pandemic has become a «common challenge», intensifying social consolidation at the level of civil society institutions; on the other hand, it has created a new axis of social inequality, deepening local differences and awareness of the different degree of «protection» from crisis conditions. It is concluded that the digitally mediated everyday interactions, characterized by a lack of social actors' co-presence in space and time, contributes to the spread of systemic integration in those social systems for which it was previously uncharacteristic. This, in turn, leads to the «frozen» functioning of social systems. In contemporary digital age, social actors are increasingly beginning to experience «digital loneliness» due to the loss of coexistence in physical time and space and the weakening of binding social capital, making familiar identification patterns less stable and definite. The «shift» of the concentration of interactions from different social circles to the level of the inner circle – the family one sets a double scenario of its reproduction either as a space of cohesive values, the highest level of trust, participation and social security, or as an environment for everyday conflicts. The article emphasizes the urgency of further conceptualization of a new type of capital – digital, which in conditions of systemic integration of social systems «puts into action» the activation of other types of capital.
Downloads
References
/References
Green Andy and Janmaat Jan Germen. Regimes of Social Cohesion: Societies and the Crisis of Globalisation. Palgrave. 2011. 304 р.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии. М.: Наука, 1991. 575 с.
Тённис Ф. Община и общество. Санкт-Петербург: Владимир-Даль, 2002. 448 с.
Chan J., To H. and Chan E. Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social indicators research. 2006. 75(2). P. 273-302.
Дейнеко О.О. Моделі емпіричної інтерпретації соціальної згуртованості: у пошуку універсальних компонентів. Габітус. Випуск 21. 2021. С. 11-18.
OECD. 2011. Perspectives on Global Development 2012, Perspectives on Global Development. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/persp_glob_dev-2012-sum-
Jeannotte M. Sharon Social cohesion: Insights from Canadian research. Presented at the Conference on Social Cohesion. Hong Kong – November 29, 2003. URL : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228981786_Social_cohesion_Insights_from_Canadian_research (01.01.2021).
Social Cohesion Radar: Measuring Common Ground. An International Comparison of Social Cohesion Methods Report. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/74134/1/Social_cohesion_radar.pdf (дата звернення: 17.04.2021).
Dickes P., Valentova M. and Borsenberger M. Construct validation and application of a common measure of social cohesion in 33 European countries. Social Indicators Research. 2010. №98 (3). Р. 451-473.
Kearns Ade, Ray Forrest. Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance. Urban Studies. 2000. Vol. 37. №5-6. Р. 995-1017.
Rajulton F., Ravanera Z., Beaujot R. Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating. Social Indicators Research. 2007. 80(3). Р. 461-492.
Friedkin Noah E. Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 2004. Vol. 30 (2004), P. 409-425.
Whelan C. and Maître B. Economic Vulnerability, Multidimensional Deprivation and Social Cohesion in an Enlarged European Community. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 2005. Vol 46(3). P. 215-239.
Jenson, Jane (2011). Defining and measuring social cohesion. Commonwealth Secretariat: UNRISD.
Berger-Schmitt R. Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research. 2002. №58. Р. 403-428.
Putnam R. Making Democracy Work. Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. 45 p.
Harwood, Paul G., and Celeste J. Lay. 2001. Surfing Alone: The Internet as a Facilitator of Social and Political Capital? Paper prepared for the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2. San Francisco.
Гидденс Э. Устроение общества: Очерк теории структурации. 2-е изд. М.: Академический Проект, 2005. 528 с.
Розвиток інститутів громадянського суспільства у 2020 році: Звіт Міністерства юстиції України. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/news/ministry/rozvitok-institutiv-gromadyanskogo-suspilstva-u-2020-rotsi (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
В Україні до протидії COVID-19 долучені майже половина ГО. Дослідження Реанімаційного Пакету Реформ. URL: ttps://rpr.org.ua/news/v-ukraini-do-protydii-covid-19-dolucheni-mayzhe-polovyna-ho-doslidzhennia (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Громадянське суспільство і криза: підсумки опитування. URL: https://www.prostir.ua/?focus=hromadyanske-suspilstvo-i-kryza-pidsumky-opytuvannya (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Громадянське суспільство в період пандемії: як вона вплинула на громадську активність. URL: https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-v-period-pandemii-yak-vona-vplinula-na-gromadsku-aktivnist (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Galabuzi G.-E., Teelucksingh Ch. Social Cohesion, Social Exclusion, Social Capital, Region of Peel Immigration. Discussion Paper, February 2010. URL : http://www.peelregion.ca/socialservices/pdfs/discussion-paper-1.pdf. (дата звернення: 19.04.2021).
COVID-19 мобілізує: як громадянське суспільство адаптується до змін. URL: https://zz.detector.media/infospace/texts/177382/2020-05-22-covid-19-mobilizuie-yak-gromadyanske-suspilstvo-adaptuietsya-do-zmin/ (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Jenson Jane. Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks. 1998. URL: https://www.academia.edu/26949106/Mapping_Social_Cohesion_The_State_of_Canadian_Research (date of appeal: 17.04.2021).
«Ревучий» 2020-й: як український бізнес пережив карантинно-кризовий рік. URL: https://youcontrol.com.ua/data-research/biznes-2020-analitika/ (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Ситуація на ринку праці та діяльність Державної служби зайнятості у січні-березні 2021 року. URL: https://www.dcz.gov.ua/analitics/67 (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Національний банк України зберіг облікову ставку на рівні 6%. URL: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/rishennya-oblikova-stavka-2020-10-22 (дата звернення: 01.05.2021).
Бурдье П. Формы капитала. Экономическая социология. 2002. №5. С. 60-75.
Сокурянська Л. Г., Дейнеко О. О. Сучасна молодь: рівна серед нерівних. Соціальні нерівності: сприйняття українським суспільством (заключний звіт САУ). Харків, 2018. С. 139-155.
Статистична інформація щодо державної реєстрації актів цивільного стану: звітність Міністерства юстиції України. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/actual-info/stat_info (дата звернення: 01.05.2021)
Green, Andy and Janmaat, Germen (2011) Regimes of Social Cohesion: Societies and the Crisis of Globalisation, Palgrave.
Durkheim, Emile (1991) The Division of Labour in Society. Method of sociology, Мoscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Tönnies, F. (2002) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, St. Petersburg: Vladimir-Dal [in Russian].
Chan, J., To, H. P. and Chan, E. (2006) ‘Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research’, Social indicators research, 75(2), 273-302.
Deineko, O. O. (2021) ‘Models of social cohesion empirical interpretation: in a search of universal components’. Journal «Habitus», 21, 11-18 [in Ukrainian].
OECD (2011) Perspectives on Global Development 2012, Perspectives on Global Development. OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/persp_glob_dev-2012-sum-en.pdf?expires=1603089712&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=D60DADA42DCC1C60387D4B0EB28663D5 (date of appeal: 17.06.2021).
Jeannotte, M. Sharon (2003) Social cohesion: Insights from Canadian research. Presented at the Conference on Social Cohesion. Hong Kong. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228981786_Social_cohesion_Insights_from_Canadian_research (date of appeal: 17.06.2021).
Social Cohesion Radar: Measuring Common Ground. An International Comparison of Social Cohesion Methods Report (2013). Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/74134/1/Social_cohesion_radar.pdf (date of appeal: 17.04.2021).
Dickes, P., Valentova, M. and Borsenberger, M. (2010) ‘Construct validation and application of a common measure of social cohesion in 33 European countries’, Social Indicators Research, 98 (3), 451-473.
Kearns, Ade, Ray, Forrest. (2000) ‘Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance’, Urban Studies, 37 (5-6), 995-1017.
Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z., Beaujot, R. (2007) ‘Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating’, Social Indicators Research, 80(3), 461-492.
Friedkin, Noah, E. (2004) ‘Social cohesion’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409-425.
Whelan, C. and Maître, B. (2005) ‘Economic Vulnerability, Multidimensional Deprivation and Social Cohesion in an Enlarged European Community’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 46(3), 215-239.
Jenson, Jane (2011) Defining and measuring social cohesion. Commonwealth Secretariat: UNRISD.
Berger-Schmitt, Regina (2002) ‘Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement’, Social indicators research, 58 (1-3): 403-428.
Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Harwood, Paul G., and Celeste J. Lay. (2001) Surfing Alone: The Internet as a Facilitator of Social and Political Capital? Paper prepared for the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2, San Francisco.
Giddens, Anthony (2005). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Moscow: Academic Avenue [in Russian].
Development of civil society institutions in 2020: Report of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. (2020). Available at: https://minjust.gov.ua/news/ministry/rozvitok-institutiv-gromadyanskogo-suspilstva-u-2020-rotsi (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Almost half of NGOs are involved in counteracting COVID-19 in Ukraine. Research of the Reanimation Package of Reforms. (2020). Available at: https: //rpr.org.ua/news/v-ukraini-do-protydii-covid-19-dolucheni-mayzhe-polovyna-ho-doslidzhennia (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Civil society and the crisis: the results of the survey. (2020). Available at: https://www.prostir.ua/?focus=hromadyanske-suspilstvo-i-kryza-pidsumky-opytuvannya (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Civil society in times the pandemic: how COVID-19 affects civic engagement. (2020). Available at: https://dif.org.ua/article/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-v-period-pandemii-yak-vona-vplinula-na-gromadsku-aktivnist (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Galabuzi, G.-E., Teelucksingh, Ch. (2010). Social Cohesion, Social Exclusion, Social Capital, Region of Peel Immigration. Discussion Paper, February 2010. Available at: http://www.peelregion.ca/socialservices/pdfs/discussion-paper-1.pdf. (date of appeal: 19.04.2021).
COVID-19 mobilizes: how civil society adapts to changes. (2020). Available at: https://zz.detector.media/infospace/texts/177382/2020-05-22-covid-19-mobilizuie-yak-gromadyanske-suspilstvo-adaptuietsya-do-zmin/ (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Jenson, Jane (1998) Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/26949106/Mapping_Social_Cohesion_The_State_of_Canadian_Research (date of appeal: 17.07.2021).
"Roaring" 2020: How Ukrainian business survived during the lockdown-crisis year. (2020). Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/data-research/biznes-2020-analitika/ (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
The situation on the labor market and the activities of the State Employment Service in January-March 2021. (2021). Available at: https://www.dcz.gov.ua/analitics/67 (date of appeal : 01.05.2021).
The National Bank of Ukraine has maintained the discount rate of 6% (2020). Available at: https://bank.gov.ua/ua/news/all/rishennya-oblikova-stavka-2020-10-22 (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).
Bourdieu, P. (2002) ‘Forms of capital’, Economic sociology, 5, 60-75 [in Russian].
Sokuryanska, L. G., Deineko, O. O. (2018) ‘Contemporary youth: equal among the unequal’. Social inequalities: perception by Ukrainian society (final report of Sociological Association of Ukraine), Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Statistical information on state registration of civil status acts: reporting of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (2020). Available at: URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/actual-info/stat_info (date of appeal: 01.05.2021).