Ideology in the Focus of Critical Discourse Analysis N. Fairclough
Abstract
Paper describes two basic principles of sociological analysis of ideology in the early XXI century: the principle of double contextualization of M. Burawoy and the principle of the duality of structures and subjects of P. Sztompka. This allowed to clarify the focus of the author's research on the intersection of the plurality of ideologies and multiparadigm of modern sociology. Authors have distinguished a sociological understanding of the transformations of the social role of ideology in the development of societies during the XIX – early XXI century and its three main phases. Taking into account the multiparadigm of ideology, the possibilities of its conceptualization in a number of major sociological metaparadigms and their axiomatic nuclei are analyzed. Paper emphasizes on diversifying the debate on the macro-micro dichotomy in the study of ideology by increasing the invariance in the interpretation of both members of this dichotomy and recognizing the complex nature of structures and subjects that have object-subject characteristics. There is a lack of sociological explication and conceptualization of such a vision of ideology and corresponding methods of empirical research. Therefore, the narrowing of sociological optics to the study of ideology within the socio-constructive direction of sociological theorizing in its critical version is argued. As the importance of studying the practical aspects of ideology and the role of its subjects in social transformations is emphasized today, the position of N. Fairclough was chosen as the main methodological source within the cluster of critical discourse analysis. Paper describes heuristic possibilities and limits of using the theoretical provisions of critical discourse-analysis of N. Fairclough for cognition of ideology. The main characteristics of ideological discourse are argued, as well as the main provisions of critical discourse-analysis are applied to the study of ideology with special attention to its subjects. As a result of the application of these research procedures, an approach to the conceptual scheme of ideology research is developed, which takes into account its object-subject characteristics and allows studying the role of agents and recipients in the construction and consumption of ideology, аs well as in the transformation of social practices and socio-cultural transformations.
Downloads
References
/References
Черниш Н. Й. Соціологічні аспекти вивчення взаємозв’язків між глобалізацією та пандемією COVID-19. Український соціум. 2020. № 4 (75). С. 11-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2020.04.009
Горлач М. І. Основні політичні ідеології сучасності. URL: https://document.wikireading.ru/hvuRMUmV4S
Харламенков В. Лівий VS правий погляд на світ. URL: http://c4u.org.ua/livyj-vs-pravyj
Прунак М. Виклик лібералізмові: критика, але не заперечення. Вісник «Соціогуманітарні проблеми людини». 2005. № 1. URL: http://znc.com.ua/ukr/publ/periodic/shpp/2005/1/p059.php
Пиаже Ж. Теория Пиаже. Разд. III: Теория стадий. История зарубежной психологии. 30-е – 60-е годы XX века. Тексты / под ред. П. Я. Гальперина, А. Н. Ждан. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1992. С. 232-292.
Соціологія ідеології. URL: http://socio.karazin.ua/resources/cadafafc50566b619aba167ddfa4d655.pdf
Україна у Світовому дослідженні цінностей. Resume of the Analytical report «Ukraine in World Values Survey 2020». URL: http://ucep.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/WVS_UA_2020_report_ENG_WEB.pdf
Брік Т., Крименюк О. Справа наліво: що думають українці про державний контроль економіки та особисту свободу? URL: https://voxukraine.org/sprava-nalivo-shho-dumayut-bilshist-ukrayintsiv-pro-derzhavnij-kontrol-ekonomiki-ta-osobistih-svobod/
Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории? Вопросы философии. 1990. №3. С. 134-145.
Многоликая глобализация. Культурное разнообразие в современном мире / под ред. Бергера П., Хантингтона С. М.; пер. с англ. В. В. Сапова; под ред. М. М. Лебедевой Аспект Пресс, 2004. 379 с.
Азар И. Раньше был коммунизм, а теперь триумф цинизма. Интервью с П. Померанцевым. URL: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/05/19/85434-ranshe-byl-kommunizm-a-teper-triumf-tsinizma
Штомпка П. В фокусе внимания повседневная жизнь. Новый поворот в социологии. Социологические исследования. 2009. № 8. С. 3-13.
Зборовский Г. Метапарадигмальная модель теоретической социологии. Социологические исследования. 2008. № 4. С. 3-15. URL: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2009-08/Shtompka.pdf
Радаев В. Возможна ли позитивная программа для российской социологии. Социологические исследования. 2008. № 7. С.24-33. URL: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2008-07/Radaev.pdf
Смелзер Н. Проблеми соціології. Ґеорг-Зімелівські лекції. Львів: Кальварія. 2003. 128 с.
Штомпка П. СОЦІОЛОГІЯ. Аналіз суспільства. Львів: Колір ПРО, 2020. 800 с.
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М.: Медиум, 1995. 323 с.
Йоргенсен М., Филлипс Л. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр. 2004. 336 с.
Ruiz J. Sociological Discourse Analysis: Methods and Logic. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2009. 10 (2). Pp.1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.2.1298
Fairclough N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge Polit Press, 1992. 251 р. URL: https://www.academia.edu/10844622/FAIRCLOUGH_Discourse_and_Social_Change
Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974. 577 р.
URL: https://www.academia.edu/9520207/Frame_Analysis_pp_1_40
Burawoy, M. (2009) “Comment: for the global sociology of the lower classes?” Sociological research. № 4. Pр. 14-15 [online]. Available at: https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2009-04/Buravoy_2.pdf [in Russian]
Chernysh, N. (2020) “Sociological aspects of the study of interconnections between globalization and the COVID-19 pandemic” Ukrainian society № 4 (75) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2020.04.009 [in Ukrainian]
Gorlach, M. The main political ideologies of today [online]. Available at: https://document.wikireading.ru/hvuRMUmV4S [in Ukrainian]
Kharlamenkov, V. Left VS Right view of the world [online]. Available at: http://c4u.org.ua/livyj-vs-pravyj [in Ukrainian]
Prunak, M. (2005) “Liberalism Challenged, but not Rejected” Herald Socio-Humanitarian Problems of Person 1 [online]. Available at: http://znc.com.ua/ukr/publ/periodic/shpp/2005/1/p059.php [in Ukrainian]
Piaget, J. (1992) “Piaget's theory. Section III: Theory of stages” History of foreign psychology. 30s - 60s of the XX century in Halperin, P. and Zhdan. A. (eds) Moscow University Press. Pp. 232-292 [in Russian]
Sociology of ideology [online]. Available at: http://socio.karazin.ua/resources/cadafafc50566b619aba167ddfa4d655.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Ukraine in the World Values Survey. Resume of the Analytical report «Ukraine in World Values Survey 2020» [online]. Available at: http://ucep.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/WVS_UA_2020_report_ENG_WEB.pdf
Brick, T., Krymenyuk, O. From right to left: what do Ukrainians think about state control of the economy and personal freedom? [online]. Available at: https://voxukraine.org/sprava-nalivo-shho-dumayut-bilshist-ukrayintsiv-pro-derzhavnij-kontrol-ekonomiki-ta-osobistih-svobod/ [in Ukrainian]
Fukuyama, F. (1990) “The end of history?” Voprosy Filosofii. 2018. № 3. Pp. 134-135, 145 [in Russian]
Berger, P. and Huntington, S. (eds.) (2004) Multifaceted globalization. Cultural diversity in the modern world. Translated by Sapova V. in Lebedeva L. (ed.) M: Aspect Press. Рp. 19-20 (8-24) [in Russian]
Azar, I. Before there was communism, and now the triumph of cynicism. Interview with P. Pomerantsev [online]. Available at: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/05/19/85434-ranshe-byl-kommunizm-a-teper-triumf-tsinizma [in Russian]
Sztompka, P. (2009) “The focus on everyday life: a new turn in sociology” Sociological studies. № 8. Рр. 3-13 [in Russian]
Zborovskiy, G. (2008) “Metaparadigm Model of Theoretical Sociology” Sociological studies. № 4. Рр. 3-15 [in Russian]
Radaev, V. (2008) “Is positive program possible for the Russian sociology” Sociological studies. № 7. Pр. 24-33 [in Russian]
Smelzer, N. (2003) Problems of sociology. Georg-Zimel's lectures. Lviv: Calvaria [in Ukrainian]
Sztompka, P. (2020) Sociology. An analysis of society. Lviv: Kolir PRO [in Ukrainian]
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1995) The Social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. M.: Medium [in Russian]
Jorgensen, M. and Phillips, L. (2004) Discourse Analysis. Theory and method. Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center [in Russian]
Ruiz Ruiz, J. (2009) “Sociological Discourse Analysis: Methods and Logic”, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.2.1298
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge Polit Press [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/10844622/FAIRCLOUGH_Discourse_and_Social_Change
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/9520207/Frame_Analysis_pp_1_40