Max Weber and Modernity: modernization, rationalization, legitimation
Abstract
The paper reveals the features of sociological theorizing offered by classical sociology, including M. Weber's concept. The thematic directions that became central to the German scholar's sociology are identified: modernization, rationalization, legitimization, etc.; their genesis is analyzed from the point of view of the philosophical (Baden School of Neo-Kantianism) and sociological (G. Simmel's concept of cultural forms) studios. It is emphasized that rationalization, which was first considered by M. Weber, becomes a cross-cutting theme in sociology up to the end of the twentieth century. Further development of the concept of rationalization takes place within the communicative turn, associated with the name of J. Habermas. The concept of constructing the social, taking into account the meaning that the author puts into his actions, becomes the first attempt of theoretical synthesis in the process of overcoming the methodological crisis in sociological science. M. Weber's sociology offers a departure from the "container approach" in the analysis of society, which was later realized within the world-systemic (A. G. Frank, I. Wallerstein, J. Arrighi, etc.) and synthetic (M. Archer, P. Bourdieu, E. Giddens, P. Sztompka, etc.) concepts. The problematic of a bureaucratization, formulated by M. Weber in the early twentieth century to describe the processes of formation of the modern state, acquires new relevance today in connection with the expansion of the "bureaucratic spirit" to commercial enterprises, built according to the network logic. The tendencies of (self-)management on the part of employees, which are accelerating due to the transition to the remote form of work. The author shows how processes of legitimation, which are necessary for the perception of changes in professional activity, simultaneously contribute to the fragmentation and disintegration of local social spaces.
Downloads
References
/References
Гергилов Р. Е. Немецкое социологическое общество перед Первой мировой войной. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2003. Т. 6. №. 3.
Кильдюшов О. Новая интеллектуальная биография Макса Вебера. Социологическое обозрение. 2020. Т. 19. №. 3.
Фукуяма Ф. Какое общество лежит в конце истории? URL: http://perevodika.ru/articles/24874.html.
Вебер М. Протестантская этика и дух капитализма. Избранные произведения. М.: Прогресс, 1990. С. 61-272.
Вебер М. Наука как призвание и профессия. Избранные произведения. М.: Прогресс, 1990. С. 707-735.
Вебер М. Основные социологические понятия. Хозяйство и общество. Очерки понимающей социологии. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016. C. 67-112 с.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / пер. с нем.; под ред. Д. В.Скляднева. Санкт-Петербург: Наука, 2001. 380 с.
Давыдов Ю. Н. Социологический редукционизм и вульгарный социологизм как симптомы кризиса. История теоретической социологии. Том 2. М.: Канон+, ОИ «Реабилитация», 2002. 560 с.
Урри Д. Мобильности. М.: Праксис, 2012. 576 с.
Урри Д. Социология за пределами обществ. Виды мобильности для XXI столетия. М.: Высш. шк. экономики, 2012. 336 с.
Элиас Н. О процессе цивилизации: Социогенетические и психогенетические исследования. Том 1. Изменения в поведении слоя мирян в странах Запада. М.; СПб: Университетская книга, 2001. 332 с.
Элиас Н. О процессе цивилизации: Социогенетические и психогенетические исследования. Том 2. Изменения в обществе. Проект теории цивилизации. М.; СПб: Университетская книга, 2001. 382 с.
Бурдье П. О государстве. Курс лекций в Коллеж де Франс (1989-1992). М.: Издательский дом ДЕЛО РАНХиГС, 2016. 720 с.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000) ‘Multiple Modernities’ Daedalus Vol.129.Pp. 1–29
Вебер М. Политика как призвание и профессия. Власть и политика. М.: РИПОЛ классик, 2017. С. 252-326.
Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура / пер. с англ. под науч. ред. О. И. Шкаратана. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2001. 608 c.
Kvachev V. From Weberian bureaucracy to networking bureaucracy // Социологическое обозрение. 2019. №18. С. 28-40.
Хабермас Ю. Отношения между системой и жизненным миром в условиях позднего капитализма // THESIS. Весна 1993. Т. 1. Вып. 2. С. 123-136.
Агамбен Дж. Homo sacer. Чрезвычайное положение / пер. с итал. М.: Европа, 2011. 148 с.
Голіков О., Тягло В. Нематеріальна праця як феномен та поняття: статус у світі ненадійності та можливості дослідження // «SOCIOПРОСТІР: Міждисциплінарний електронний збірник наукових праць з соціології та соціальної роботи», 2021 (10). С. 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2470-2020-10-01
Gergilov, R. (2003). “German Sociological Society before the First World War” The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology № 3 [in Russian]
Kildyushov, О. (2020). “New Intellectual Biography of Max Weber” Sociological review 19(3) [in Russian]
Fukuyama, F. (2014). What kind of Society is in the End of History? The Kiev Times [online]. Available at: http://perevodika.ru/articles/24874.html. [in Russian]
Weber, M. (1990). “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism”. Selected works. Moscow: Progress. P. 61-272 [in Russian]
Weber, M (1990). “Science as a Vocation”. Selected works. Moscow: Progress. P. 707-735 [in Russian]
Weber, M (2016). “Basic Concepts in Sociology” Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, P. 67-112 [in Russian]
Habermas, Y. (2001) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Saint-Petersburg: Science [in Russian]
Davydov, Y. (2002) “Sociological Reductionism and Vulgar Sociologism as the Symptoms of Crysis” History of Theoretical Sociology. Мoscow: Canon+, P. 142-167 [in Russian]
Urry, J. (2012) Mobility. Moscow: Praksis [in Russian]
Urry, J. (2012). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Moscow [in Russian]
Elias, N. (2001). The civilizing process (Vol. 1). Moscow: Book of University [in Russian]
Elias, N. (2001). The civilizing process (Vol. 2). Moscow: Book of University [in Russian]
Bourdieu, P. (2016) On the state: Lectures at the College de France (1989-1992). Moscow: Publishing House «Deal» [in Russian]
Eisenstadt S. N. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus. 2000. Vol.129. Pp. 1–29
Weber, M (2017). “Politics as a Vocation”. Power and Politics. Moscow: RIPOL-classics, pp. 252-326.
Castels, M (2019) The Informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
Kvachev, V. (2019). “From Weberian bureaucracy to networking bureaucracy”. Sociological Review 18(2) P. 28-40.
Habermas, J. (1993) Relations Between the System and the Life-World in the Conditions of Late Capitalism. THESIS 2(1).
Agamben, G. (2011) Homo sacer. State of Emergency. Moscow: Europe.
Golikov, A.S., & Tyaglo, V. (2020) “Intangible Work as a Phenomenon and Concept: Status in a World of Insecurity and Research Possibilities” «SOCIOPROSTIR: The Interdisciplinary Online Collection of Scientific Works on Sociology and Social Work», №10, pp. 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2470-2020-10-01