THEORETICAL AXES OF THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL COHESION: RETHINKING OF E. DURKHEIM'S SCIENTIFIC HERITAGE
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to reviewing the scientific heritage of the classic of French sociology E. Durkheim through the optics of identification of theoretical foundations of the concept of social cohesion. Methodological complexity of the research task is due to the lack of well-formed and clearly defined concept of social cohesion in the scientific heritage of E. Durkheim, reconstruction of theoretical axes of which requires sociological imagination and inductive method using. The author attributes the relevance of this research perspective to the fact that in most foreign studies dedicated to social cohesion phenomenon research there are either limited mentions of E. Durkheim as one of the founders of social cohesion concept or inaccurate interpretations of his views. The paper identifies seven theoretical axes of the concept of social cohesion, presented in the scientific heritage of E. Durkheim - homogeneity / differentiation, value-normative consensus / anomie, lack of interactions / constancy of interactions, mechanical solidarity / organic solidarity, relationship between individual and collective, inclusion / exclusion, integration / disintegration. The author has determined semantic purpose and presence at different social levels for each axis. It is established that some elements of certain theoretical axes are present as components of models of social cohesion empirical operationalization in contemporary foreign studies conducted by J. Chan, R. Berger-Schmitt, J. Jenson. It is summed up heuristics of E. Durkheim's definition of essence of social cohesion as a social process that has a dynamic nature of formation and reproduction, requires avoidance of extreme states of its implementation (overpowering or deficiency) and has an impact on all social levels – macro-, meso- and micro-. Emphasis has been placed on the identification of the classics of French sociology social cohesion practical significance as a social phenomenon that has preventive properties against a wide range of negative social phenomena and processes. This fact, according to the author, makes the concept of social cohesion heuristic not only for scientific discourse but also for contemporary state social policy.
Downloads
References
/References
Council of Europe. 2008. Report of High-Level Task Force on Social Cohesion: Towards an Active, Fair and Socially Cohesive Europe. URL: https://rm.coe.int/report-towards-an-active-fair-and-socially-cohesive-europe-janv-2008-t/1680939181 (date of appeal : 17.10.2020).
Chan J., To H. P. and Chan E. Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research. Social Indicators Research. 2006. №75(2). P. 273–302.
OECD. 2011. Perspectives on Global Development 2012, Perspectives on Global Development. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/persp_glob_dev-2012-sum-en.pdf?expires=1603089712&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=D60DADA42DCC1C60387D4B0EB28663D5 (date of appeal: 17.10.2020).
Patrick Sturgis, Ian Brunton-Smith, Jouni Kuha & Jonathan Jackson. Ethnic Diversity, Segregation and the Social Cohesion of Neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2013. №37 (8). Р. 1286 – 1309.
Гриненко А. М., Кирилюк В. В. Соціальна згуртованість суспільства в умовах демократії. Вісник Кам'янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка. Економічні науки. 2013. Вип. 11. С. 220–226.
Полунєєв Ю. В. Соціальна згуртованість як складова економічного прориву. Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. 2011. №33. С. 161–165.
Кицак Т. Г. Соціально-трудові аспекти соціальної згуртованості суспільства. Соціально-трудові відносини: теорія та практика. 2013. № 2. С. 171–175.
Noll H-H. Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität аnd “Neue” Wohlfahrtskonzepte. Berlin: WZB Discussion Papers, 2000. URL: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2000/p00-505.pdf (date of appeal: 17.10.2020).
Rajulton Fernando, Zenaida Ravanera and Roderic Beaujot. Measuring Social Cohesion: an Experiment Using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Social Indicators Research. 2007. №80 (3). P. 461–492.
Fonseca Xavier, Stephan Lukosch and Frances Brazier. Social Cohesion Revisited: a New Definition and How to Characterize It. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2019. №32 (2). P. 231–253.
Delhey Jan, Klaus Boehnke, Georgi Dragolov, Zsófia S Ignácz, Mandi Larsen, Jan Lorenz, and Michael Koch. Social Cohesion and Its Correlates: A Comparison of Western and Asian Societies. Comparative Sociology. 2018. №17(3-4). Р. 426–455.
Дюркгейм Эмиль О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии. Москва, 1991. 575 с.
Батыгин Г. С., Подвойский Д. Г. История социологии. Москва, 2007. 448 с.
Дюркгейм Э. Самоубийство: Социологический этюд / пер. с фр. с сокр.; под ред. В. А. Базарова. М., 1994. 399 с.
Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р., Ярская В. Н. Социальная сплоченность: направления теоретической дискуссии и перспективы социальной политики, 2014. URL: http://www.jourssa.ru/sites/all/files/volumes/2014_4/Iarskaya_Yarskaya_2014_4.pdf (дата звернення: 01.10.2020).
Андерсон Бенедикт. Уявлені спільноти. Міркування щодо походження й поширення націоналізму. К., 2001. 272 с.
Berger-Schmitt Regina. Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments: Concept and Measurement. Social indicators research. 2002. №58 (1-3). P. 403–428.
Jenson Jane. Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks. 1998. URL: https://www.academia.edu/26949106/Mapping_Social_Cohesion_The_State_of_Canadian_Research (date of appeal: 17.10.2020).
Council of Europe (2008). Report of High-Level Task Force on Social Cohesion: Towards an Active, Fair and Socially Cohesive Europe [online]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/report-towards-an-active-fair-and-socially-cohesive-europe-janv-2008-t/1680939181 (date of appeal: 17.10.2020).
Chan, J., To, H. P. and Chan, E. (2006) ‘Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research’, Social indicators research, 75(2), 273-302.
OECD (2011). Perspectives on Global Development 2012, Perspectives on Global Development. OECD Publishing [online]. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/persp_glob_dev-2012-sum-en.pdf?expires=1603089712&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=D60DADA42DCC1C60387D4B0EB28663D5 (date of appeal : 17.10.2020).
Patrick Sturgis, Ian Brunton-Smith, Jouni Kuha & Jonathan Jackson. (2013) ‘Ethnic Diversity, Segregation and the Social Cohesion of Neighbourhoods in London’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, №37 (8) [online]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2013.831932 (date of appeal : 17.11.2020).
Grinenko, А. М., Kurulyk, V. V. (2013) ‘Social cohesion of society in conditions of democracy’, Vysnuk of Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University. Economic sciences, 11. P. 220-226 [in Ukrainian]
Poluneev, Yu. V. (2011) ‘Social cohesion as a part of economic development’, National Vysnul of Uzhorod University, 33. P. 161-165 [in Ukrainian]
Kusak, T. H. (2013) ‘Social-labour aspects of social cohesion of society’, Social-labour relations: Theory and practice, 2. P. 171-175 [in Ukrainian]
Noll, H-H. (2000) Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität аnd “neue” Wohlfahrtskonzepte. Berlin: WZB Discussion Papers [online]. Available at: https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2000/p00-505.pdf (date of appeal: 17.10.2020).
Rajulton, Fernando, Zenaida Ravanera, and Roderic Beaujot. (2007) ‘Measuring social cohesion: An experiment using the Canadian national survey of giving, volunteering, and participating’, Social indicators research, 80 (3): 461-492.
Fonseca, Xavier, Stephan Lukosch, and Frances Brazier. (2019) ‘Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32 (2): 231-253.
Delhey, Jan, Klaus Boehnke, Georgi Dragolov, Zsófia S Ignácz, Mandi Larsen, Jan Lorenz, and Michael Koch. (2018) ‘Social cohesion and its correlates: A comparison of Western and Asian societies’, Comparative Sociology, 17 (3-4): 426-455.
Durkheim, Emile (1991) The Division of Labour in Society. Method of sociology. Мoscow: Nauka[in Russian]
Batugin, H. S., Podvoiskyi, D. H. (2007) History of sociology. Мoscow: Higher Education and Science [in Russian]
Durkheim, E. (1994) Suicide: Sociological Etude/ Translation from Fr., shorten; Edited by V. А. Bazarova. Moscow: Musl [in Russian]
Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. R., Yarskaya, V. N. (2014) Social Cohesion: Directions of Theoretical Discussion and Perspectives for Social Policy [online]. Available at: http://www.jourssa.ru/sites/all/files/volumes/2014_4/Iarskaya_Yarskaya_2014_4.pdf (date of appeal: 01.10.2020) [in Russian]
Anderson, Benedict (2001) Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. К.: Critics [in Ukrainian]
Berger-Schmitt, Regina (2002) ‘Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement’, Social indicators research, 58 (1-3): 403-428.
Jenson, Jane (1998) Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian policy research networks [online]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/26949106/Mapping_Social_Cohesion_The_State_of_Canadian_Research (date of appeal : 17.10.2020).