METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UNDER DECENTRALIZATION IN UKRAINE

Keywords: mechanism of state strategic management of rural territories sustainable development, strategic assessment of management system, management system, territories sustainable development, rural territories, decentralization.

Abstract

In article it is defined methodological basis for strategic assessment of rural territories development management system under decentralization in Ukraine. The elements of this process are revealed: goals, principles, methods, tools, criteria and sequence of actions. It is emphasized that the purpose of strategic assessment of the system of management of rural territories development in the context of decentralization is to obtain reliable information about the activities of public authorities in the context of implementing certain long-term community transformations in order to make timely administrative decisions.

The following approaches to the strategic assessment of rural territories development management system are distinguished: systemic (unity of all components of the process), complex (integrity of the elements of assessment), functional (orientation to management functions and their implementation), organizational (diagnostics of organizational structure of institutions).

An integrated approach to the implementation of the strategic assessment of rural territories development management system is offered, through analysis of the activities of all structural units and their relationship with other stakeholders regarding compliance with the provisions of the regulatory documents in accordance with the defined management functions by certain criteria. The matrix of the institutional capacity assessment of the rural territories development management system is presented.

A method of determining the stages of the life cycle of a rural territories development management system under decentralization is revealed, which will allow to distinguish following states: recently established management system; dynamically growing management system; mature management system; recession or crisis management system.

The components of strategic assessment of rural territories development management system under decentralization are revealed: monitoring of processes of budgeting and financial management of territorial community, processes of providing of administrative and social services by key criteria of democratic governance, advocacy, inclusivity and integration, financial security of the community using the benefits of public-reengineering methodology, benchmarking and outsourcing, strategic and content analytics tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alina Horban , KRI NAPA, Kharkiv

PhD in Public Administration, Аssociate Professor of  Economic Policyand Management Department, KRIPA NAPA, Kharkiv

References

Averianov, V.B. (2007). Derzhavne upravlinnia: yevropeiski standarty, dosvid ta administratyvne pravo. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Bakumenko, V.D., Popov, S.V. (2015). Paradyhma innovatsiinoho rozvytku suspilstva: suchasni kontseptsii reformuvannia publichnoho upravlinnia. URL: http://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/edu_43/fail/4.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Bobrovska, O. (2005). Metodychne zabezpechennia otsinky rezultativ diialnosti orhaniv munitsypalnoho upravlinnia. Aktualni problemy derzhanoho upravlinnia, 3 (21), 223–232. Dnipropetrovsk: DRIDU NADU [in Ukrainian].

Varnalii, Z.S., Tomashevskyi, T.T. (2018). Mistse finansovoi bezpeky v systemi ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy. Internauka: mizhnarodny naukovyi zhurnal. Seriia: Ekonomich ninauky, 8, 53–60 [in Ukrainian].

Vasina, A., Adamiv M. (2019). Osoblyvosti nadannia administratyvnykh posluh orhanamy vlady. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia natsionalnym hospodarstvom, 1, 18–26. [in Ukrainian].

Hazarian, S.V., Nosyk, O.A. (2017). Orhanizatsiino-funktsionalna struktura sluzhby upravlinnia personalom derzhavnoho orhanu vidpovidno do pryntsypu merytokratii. Derzhavne budivnytstvo, 1. URL: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2017-1/doc/3/02.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Odintsova, H.S., Mostovyi, H.I., Amosov, O.Yu. (2002). Derzhavne upravlinnia i menedzhment. Kharkiv: KharRI UADU [in Ukrainian].

Iermolenko, O.A., Mordovets, A.V. (2014) Innovatsiini metody pokrashchennia kadrovoho potentsialu derzhavnykh orhaniv vlady. Ekonomika rozvytku, 1 (69), 101–105 [in Ukrainian].

Zolotarov, V.F. (2014). Sutnist kadrovoho zabezpechennia orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia. URL: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2014-2/doc/3/01.pdf

[in Ukrainian].

Zakonodavchyi vymir reformy detsentralizatsii. Korotkyi ohliad zakonoproektiv ta osnovnykh normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv (2017). Parasiuk, L. Kyiv: FOP Moskalenko, O.M.

[in Ukrainian].

Kahanovska, T.Ye. (2010). Kadrove zabezpechennia derzhavnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini. Kharkiv: KhNU im. V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].

Klimushyn, P.S., Spasibov, D.V. (2016). Metodolohii rehlamentatsii ta nadannia elektronnykh administratyvnykh posluh. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1 (49), 2–5. Kharkiv: KharRI NADU [in Ukrainian].

Czygankova, D.B. (2010). Kollokvyum “Otsenyvanyeprohramm y polytyk: metodolohyia y prymenenye”. Issue V. Moskow [in Russian].

Korotkov, E.M. (2000). Issledovanie sistem upravleniya. Moskow: DeKa [in Russian].

Kuts, Yu.O. (2011). Yakist nadannia upravlinskykh posluh yak chynnyk efektyvnosti mistsevoho uprvalinnia. Derzhavne budivnytstvo: elektron. nauk. fakh. vid, 2. URL: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2011-2/index.html Kharkiv: KharRI NADU [in Ukrainian].

Libanova, E.M. (2010). Humanizm, suspilna intehratsiia ta sotsialnyi rozvytok. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika, 2, 3–15. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Mistseve samovriaduvannia v umovakh detsentralizatsii vlady v Ukraini (2016). Pliushcha, R.M. (Ed.). Kyiv: Ridna mova [in Ukrainian].

Porter, E. Maikl (2005). Konkurentnaia stratehyia. Metodyka analyza otraslei y konkurentov. Moskow: Alpina Biznes Buks [in Russian].

Romaniuk, S.A. (2019). Teoriia ta praktyka stratehichnoho upravlinnia. Kyiv: NADU

[in Ukrainian].

Skupchenko, D.O. (2017). Normatyvno-pravove zabezpechennia rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad v Ukraini. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 2 (57), 1–7. Kharkiv: KharRI NADU [in Ukrainian].

Latynin, M.A., Lozynska, T.M., Dunaiev, I.V. (2013). Stratehichne planuvannia. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KharRI NADU “Mahistr” [in Ukrainian].

Vakulenko, V.M., Mamonova, V.V., Sharov, Yu.P. (2004). Stratehichne planuvannia na mistsevomu ta rehionalnomu rivniakh. Uzhhorod: Patent [in Ukrainian].

Uljjanchenko, Ju.O. (2013). Naprjamy derzhavnogho reghuljuvannja zemeljnykh vidnosyn v Ukrajini. Pravo ta derzhavne upravlinnia : zb. nauk. pr., 3, 106–109. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Uljjanchenko, Ju.O. (2015). Derzhavne stymuljuvannja rozvytku aghrarny khklasteriv. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia: zb. nauk. pr., 1 (48), 92–100. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo KhaRI NADU “Mahistr” [in Ukrainian].

Ukhach, V., Syrko, U. (2018). Zakonodavche zabezpechennia detsentralizatsii mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini (teoretyko-pravovyi aspekt) Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva, 1, 42–48.

harkiv [in Ukrainian].

Sharov, Yu.P. (2013). Innovatsiini pidkhody do menedzhmentu ta upravlinnia proektamy u praktytsi publichnoho upravlinnia. Innovatsiini pidkhody menedzhmentu u praktytsi publichnoho upravlinnia: materialynauk.-prakt. konf. zamizhnar. uchastiu, m. Dnipropetrovsk, 22 lystopada 2013 r.

Dnipropetrovsk: DRIDU NADU, 7–14.

Fedorchak, O.V. (2012). Innovatsiini instrumenty upravlinnia tsilovymy prohramamy ta proektamy. URL: http://www.kbuapa.kharkov.ua/e-book/db/2012-2/doc/1/10.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published
2020-02-28
How to Cite
Horban , A. (2020). METHODOLOGICAL BASIS FOR STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UNDER DECENTRALIZATION IN UKRAINE. Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 1(68), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.34213/tp.20.01.21
Section
Directions of Local Government System Reformation in Ukraine