CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO STATE POLICY OF INTRODUCTION OF GENDER EQUALITY TO JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Abstract
A successful introduction of gender policy is one of the factors of implementing democratic reforms. Judicial power is a mandatory component of the mechanism of the state through which it performs its functions. The introduction of the principle of gender equality in the judicial system of Ukraine will contribute to the awareness of the social context of justice and the need for equal participation of women and men in making important decisions that have a significant impact not only on individuals but also on society as a whole. That is why it is necessary to apply conceptual approaches to the state policy of gender equality in the judicial system, which confirms the relevance of the topic of the article.
Successful implementation of gender policy is possible if it is scientifically sound. There are various conceptual approaches to the state policy of introducing gender equality in the judicial system, in particular:
– the concept of equal opportunities and justice. It takes into account the fact that women and men are equally qualified as judges and that there are no scientific or genetic qualities or characteristics that would justify the dominance of men in decision-making bodies;
– the concept of democratic legitimacy. It stipulates that the composition of the judiciary should reflect the descriptive composition of society. Otherwise, justice will not be achieved and the trial and its outcome will lack legitimacy;
– an approach to the unique contribution of women judges to the judicial activity. It relies on the justification of “gender differences”;
– the utilitarian approach takes into account that women make up half of the population, and have the same skills, intelligence, experience and competencies, as male lawyers. Therefore, modern societies cannot afford to lose the intellectual strength and energy of half the population.
The foreign experience of the EU member states testifies to successful achievement of gender parity in the judicial systems of these countries, the expansion of women’s representation in professional judicial positions due to application of a number of conceptual approaches in practice: anti-discrimination laws, directives and gender equality policy.
In Ukraine, a conceptual approach is used, which contains the principle of equal rights and opportunities for women and men in access to judicial profession and participation in decision-making that affect not only the fate of individuals, but also the state and society as a whole. Sociological research suggests that this is not enough to achieve the desired result – elimination of traditional gender stereotypes, signs of gender discrimination in the professional environment of judges, and gender disparities in the judicial system of Ukraine.
The application of the above conceptual approaches to the state policy of gender equality in the judicial system will help to take into account gender issues in state policy, as well as in strategies and programs of sustainable development related to the judicial system of Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Buromenskyj, M., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Dobir suddiv vyschoi instantsii: analiz inozemnoho dosvidu. Visnyk Vyschoi kvalifikatsijnoi komisii suddiv Ukrainy, 4, 4-48. URL: https://cutt.ly/7fJAoq7 [in Ukrainian].
Moskvych, L.M. (2010). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok sudovykh system. Visnyk Vyschoi rady iustytsii, 3, 73-81 [in Ukrainian].
Stratehiia hendernoi rivnosti Rady Yevropy na 2018-2023 rr. (2018). Rada Yevropy. URL: https://cutt.ly/YfJ2vIj [in Ukrainian].
Fulej, T.I. (2016). Henderna rivnist pry zdijsnenni pravosuddia: Vyd. 2-he, vypr. Kyiv: VAITE [in Ukrainian].
Fulej, T.I. (2015). Gendernyj sklad suddivs’koho korpusu Ukrainy. Visnyk Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrainy, 4, 41–47 [in Ukrainian].
Cahillane, L. (2016). Judicial Diversityin Ireland. University of Limerick Institutional Repository. URL: https://core.ac.uk/reader/59358672.
Goodman, C. (2020). Clearing the Bench: Using Mandatory Retirement to Promote Gender Parity in the U.S. and the EU Judiciaries. URL: https://cutt.ly/ofJHbJZ.
Gibson-Morgan, E. (2015). Gender Equality in the Judiciary in England and France: Making it a living reality. Université François Rabelais, Tours, 114–133 URL: https://cutt.ly/PaSTlrA.
Hunter, R. (2015). More than Just a Different Face? Judicial Diversity and Decision-making. Oxford University Press. Current Legal Problems, 68, issue 1, 119–141. URL: https://cutt.ly/3fJ4eiX.
Malleson, K. (2003). Justifying gender equality on the bench: why difference won’t do. Feminist Legal Studies, 11 (1), 1-24. URL: https://cutt.ly/YasdyuN.
Mapping the representation of women and men in legal professions across the EU / European Parliament. Interim Report. Committee on Women´s Rights and Gender Equality (2017). URL: https://cutt.ly/raagaYn.
Phillips, A. (2012). Representation and inclusion. Politics and Gender, 8 (4), 512–518. URL: https://cutt.ly/HfJ3IVv.
Rackley, E. (2013). Women, judging and the judiciary: from difference to diversity. Routledge. New York. URL: https://cutt.ly/zfJ3E6z.
Women delivering justice: contributions, barriers, pathways: report of IDLO (2018). International Development Law Organization (IDLO). Rome. URL: https://cutt.ly/tfJ9ggz.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).