Kuts H. M., Kuts Yu. O. Ukrainian political identity vs russian political identity: demarcation lines
Abstract
The article is devoted to identifying the key demarcation lines between Ukrainian and Russian political identities. Particular attention is paid to the importance of conceptual demarcation between the notions of Ukrainian and Russian political identities in the context of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine.
Political identities, like various forms of collective identities, are acquired phenomena. They undergo changes over a long period of time. It is noted that effective strategies for constructing political identities determine the formation of new traditions.
A comparison of the phenomena of Ukrainian political identity and Russian political identity is carried out, in particular in a historical context. The main differences between the Ukrainian and Russian types of political identities are identified.
It is argued that the categories of individualism, freedom, and rejection of authoritarian principles are key to Ukrainian political identity. For carriers of Russian political identity, the category of freedom does not hold significant value. On the contrary, servile obedience has long been considered a virtue within Muscovite society.
Carriers of Ukrainian political identity adopt a critical attitude toward representatives of power. Accordingly, one should not expect automatic submission to authority from Ukrainians. For citizens of Ukraine, the authority and legitimacy of the head of power are important.
For carriers of Russian political identity, the need for a supreme leader is essential. It is this leader who is expected to make all important decisions independently, while the population is required to execute them. This state of Russian political culture is determined by long-standing practices of authoritarianism.
It is stated that one of the dominant features of Russian political identity is atomization, that is, the fragmentation of society. Such a situation makes the formation of large-scale protest actions in Russia impossible, since people are unable to trust one another.
Carriers of Ukrainian political identity are characterized by the ability for cooperation and self-organization, which is formed in societies with a high level of social capital, where there is significant trust among people.
Downloads
References
Vakulova T. (2014). Identychnist. N.M. Homa (ed.). Politolohiya: navchalnyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk dovidnyk dlya studentiv VNZ I-IV rivniv akredytatsiyi, Lviv: Vydavnytstvo «Novyy Svit–2000», 237–238 [in Ukrainian].
Guibernau M. (2012). Identychnist natsiy. Kyiv: Tempora. 304 [in Ukrainian].
Kymlichka V. (2001). Liberalizm i prava menshyn. Kharkiv: Tsentr Osvitnikh Initsiatyv, 176. [in Ukrainian].
Kyrydon A. (2017). Yevropeyska identychnist: opryyavnennya v umovakh hlobalizatsiyi. Hlobalizovanyy svit: vyprobuvannya lyudskoho buttya. Zhytomyr, 35–42 [in Ukrainian].
Kilmanzegg P.G. (2007). Intehratsiya ta demokratiya. Yakhtenfuks M., Kolyer-Kokh B. (eds.). Yevropeyska intehratsiya. Kyiv: Vydavnychyy dim «Kyyevo-Mohylyanska akademiya», 33–50. [in Ukrainian].
Kuts H.M. (2007). Liberalizm i demokratiya. Viche, 12. Spetsvypusk. S. 17-20. [in Ukrainian].
Kuts H.M. (2020). Kontseptualizatsiya ponyat «natsionalna bezpeka» i «derzhavna bezpeka» u polityko-pravovomu dyskursi. Suchasne suspilstvo: politychni nauky, sotsiolohichni nauky, kulʹturolohichni nauky. Kharkiv. 1 (20), 139–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34142/24130060.2020.20.1.13 [in Ukrainian].
Kuts H.M. (2007). Problematyka identychnosti v liberalnomu konteksti. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriya: «Pytannya politolohiyi». Kharkiv. 785, 10, 79–85 [in Ukrainian].
Politolohiya: entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk. (2014). Melnyk V.P. (ed.). Lviv: Vydavnytstvo LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 406 [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko S. (2024). Ukrayinskyy spadshchynnyy dyskurs porazky rosiyskoyi identychnosti. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA: Istoriya i teoriya kulʹtury. 7, 69-83. DOI: 10.18523/2617-8907.2024.7.69-83 URL: https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/a19a1da9-d7c4-4f67-9090-5bab2be7933d/content [in Ukrainian].
Rushchenko I.P. (2015). Rosiysko-ukrayinska hibrydna viyna: pohlyad sotsioloha. Kharkiv: FOP Pavlenko O.H. 268 s. [in Ukrainian].
Smith A.D. (1994). Natsionalna identychnist. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Osnovy. 224 [in Ukrainian].
Starodubska M. (2022). Khytrospletinnya indyvidualizmu ta kolektyvizmu: Chomu Rosiya rozumiye lyshe sylu i ne ye «bratskym» narodom Ukrayini. Ukrayinska Pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2022/03/27/7334943/ [in Ukrainian].
Tompson E.M. (2006). Trubadury imperiyi: rosiyska literatura i kolonializm. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Solomiyi Pavlychko «Osnovy». 368 [in Ukrainian].
Shevko V.H. (2022). Rosiyska identychnist yak dyskurs ta dzherelo ahresiyi proty Ukrayiny. Aktualni filosofski, politolohichni ta kulturolohichni problemy rozvytku lyudyny i suspilstva u dynamichnomu ta hlobalizovanomu sviti. Kyiv: Tavriyskyy natsionalnyy universytet imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. S. 76–80. URL: https://files.znu.edu.ua/files/Bibliobooks/Inshi71/0052076.pdf#page=76 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko N. (2020). Politychna identychnist: kontseptualizatsiya ponyattya. European Political and Law Discourse, 7, 6, 130–135. DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2020.7.6.15 [in Ukrainian].
Bertelsmann Transformation Index. URL: www.bti-project.org
Bugajski J. (2022). A Guide to Russia’s Rupture. URL: https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Russias-Rupture-MS-full-web-version.pdf
Castells M. (2003). The Power of Identity: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 2. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, URL: https://cdn.oujdalibrary.com/books/1001/1001-the-power-of-identity-the-information-age-economy-society-and-culture-volume-ii-second-edition-information-age-series-(www.tawcer.com).pdf
Country Reports. Russia. Bertelsmann Transformation Index. URL: https://bti-project.org/en/downloads?content=country&country=RUS
Country Reports. Ukraine. Bertelsmann Transformation Index. URL: https://bti-project.org/en/downloads?content=country&country=UKR
Korb J.G. (1701). Diarium itineris in Moscoviam Perillustris. URL: https://dbc.wroc.pl/dlibra/publication/152048/edition/109708/content?ref=L3B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLzIxMDY0L2VkaXRpb24vMTg4MDY
Kuzio T. (2016). Nationalism and authoritarianism in Russia: Introduction to the special issue. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49, 1 (March Special Issue), 1–11. URL: https://krytyka.com/sites/krytyka/files/kuzio_introduction.pdf
Strategikon of Maurice. URL: https://dn710206.ca.archive.org/0/items/maurice-strategikon-dennis-1984/Maurice_Strategikon_Dennis_1984.pdf
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).