RHETORIC OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY: NEO, SHREK, AND THE EVOLUTION OF AGENCY IN THE AGE OF ALGORITHMS

  • Yaroslav Halstyan PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1193-2750
  • Artem Perchyk PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4917-7846
Keywords: digital subjectivity, post-irony, algorithmic rhetoric, techno-gnosticism, multimodality, post-anthropological rhetoric

Abstract

The article examines the ontological transformations of rhetorical subjectivation under conditions of digital mediation. Through hermeneutic analysis of the archetypal figures of Neo («The Matrix») and Shrek (the eponymous animated narrative), the study conceptualizes paradigmatic modes of constituting subjectivity in the post-digital era. The research articulates the transition from post-structuralist deconstruction of the Cartesian cogito to emergent forms of distributed agency in hybrid human-machine assemblages.

The work identifies three distinctive epistemological models: techno-gnostic (represented by Neo), post-ironic (embodied in Shrek), and post-anthropological (manifested by algorithmic actors). The first model explicates the modernist project of emancipation through vertical transcendence and binary oppositions of real/simulative. The second demonstrates the postmodernist strategy of horizontal immanence, where irony functions as an ontological category. The third reveals the radical deterritorialization of rhetorical agency under conditions of algorithmic governance.

The study analyzes the fundamental reconfiguration of the classical rhetorical triad (ethos, pathos, logos) in digital space. Pathos transforms from affective disposition into performative practice through mechanisms of participation. Logos is reduced to probabilistic algorithms of machine learning. Ethos is constituted as a hybrid phenomenon at the intersection of human and non-human.

The crisis of authenticity in the context of generative technologies is examined, problematizing traditional epistemological dichotomies of true/false. A concept of new rhetorical ethics is proposed, founded on principles of algorithmic transparency and conscious hybridity of communicative acts.

The article articulates perspectives for further research on post-anthropological forms of rhetorical subjectivation, particularly post-ironic gnosticism (synthesis of transcendental and ironic modes) and techno-memetic agency (algorithmic production of discursive presence) as possible ontological frameworks for conceptualizing rhetoric within the posthumanist turn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baudrillard, J. (1994) Simulacra and simulation / transl. from French by S. F. Glaser. – Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press. 164 p.(Originally published 1981).

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1987) A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia / transl. from French by B. Massumi. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press. 610 p. (Originally published 1980).

Derrida, J. (1976) Of grammatology / transl. from French by G. C. Spivak. – Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. 354 p. (Originally published 1967).

Drucker, J. (2014) Graphesis: Visual forms of knowledge production. – Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. 240 p.

Eyman, D. (2015) Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. – Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press. 184 p.

Fahner, C. (2023) Inverting the algorithmic gaze: Confronting platform power through media artworks: PhD thesis / Toronto Metropolitan University and York University. Toronto. 215 p. – Mode of access: https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Inverting_the_Algorithmic_Gaze_Confronting_Platform_Power_Through_Media_Artworks/26871469.

Foucault, M. (1970) The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. – New York : Pantheon Books. – 387 p. – (Originally published 1966).

Kirby, A. (2009) Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. – London : Continuum. – 232 p.

Konstantinou, L. (2016) Cool characters: Irony and American fiction. – Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. 272 p.

Lacan, J. (1977) Écrits: A selection / transl. from French by A. Sheridan. – New York : W. W. Norton & Company. 338 p. (Originally published 1966).

Pariser, E. (2011) The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. – New York : Penguin Press. 294 p.

Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 201 p.

Vermeulen, T., та van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677

Vermeulen, T., та van den Akker, R. (2015). Utopia, Sort of: A Case Study in Metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica, 87(1), 55–67.

Zahurska, N. (2022). NEW SINCERITY IN POST-POSTMODERN ART. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (66), 19-26. URL: https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2022-66-1

Zahurska, N. V. (2019). FROM NARCISSISM TO AUTISM: A DIGIMODERNIST VERSION OF POST-POSTMODERN. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (61), 6-12. URL: https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-1.

Published
2025-07-06
Cited
How to Cite
Halstyan, Y., & Perchyk, A. (2025). RHETORIC OF DIGITAL SUBJECTIVITY: NEO, SHREK, AND THE EVOLUTION OF AGENCY IN THE AGE OF ALGORITHMS. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (71), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2025-71-06