BETWEEN THE QUOTE AND THE CODE IN DIGIMODERN TEXTUALITY: AN INTERPRETATION

  • Artem Perchyk PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4917-7846
  • Serhii Bednarskyi PhD Student of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy named after Professor Y. B. Shad, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4496-648X
Keywords: digimodernism, digital humanities, postmodernism, digital textuality, algorithmicity, animation, digital culture

Abstract

The article examines the concept of digimodernism in the context of contemporary cultural paradigm transformation and its interrelation with the development of digital humanities. It explores the philosophical issues of interaction between traditional humanities disciplines and digital technologies, and their influence on the formation of new cultural patterns. The main focus is on a critical analysis of Alan Kirby's theory, who proclaimed digimodernism as a new cultural paradigm that has displaced postmodernism. Using the material of modern animated films ("Toy Story", "Shrek", "Soul", "Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse", "Arcane"), the evolution of artistic language from postmodernist citation to digimodernist algorithmicity is traced. A phenomenological analysis of digital textuality as a key element of digimodernist culture is conducted, revealing its ontological features: interactivity, processuality, algorithmic temporality, and hybrid authorship. The Kirbian thesis about a radical break between postmodernism and digimodernism is problematized; instead, the rhizomatic nature of cultural transformation is substantiated, where digimodernism appears not as a negation but as a technological hypertrophy of postmodernist practices. The research proposes new terminological constructs for the analysis of digital culture: "computational sublimity", "ontological heterogeneity", "transmedial sensibility". "technoepistemic regimes". Based on the study of animation evolution, three phases of digimodernism development are distinguished: hybridization (combining postmodernist content with digital form), algorithmization (domination of technological structures), and synthesis (complete fusion of technology with artistic practice). It is argued that digimodernism is a fundamentally different mode of cultural existence in the digital age, where digital artifacts exist in a mode of "stable potentiality". and their materiality is algorithmically determined but performatively open. It is asserted that the development of digital humanities and their integration with the philosophical understanding of digimodernism opens perspectives for creating a transdisciplinary epistemic matrix capable of producing fundamentally new forms of knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artemenko, A. P. (2020). Misto metamodernu: Problema avtentychnosti [The city of metamodern: The problem of authenticity]. Visnyk KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Istoriia», 57, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2020-57-01 (in Ukrainian).

Artemenko, A. P. (2021). Perekhid do metamodernu: Antropolohiia prostoru [The transition to metamodern: Anthropology of space]. Mizhdsytsyplinarni doslidzhennia, (1), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.33625/visnik2021.01.101 (in Ukrainian).

Karpenko , I., & Perepelytsia , O. (2024). ACADEMIC LIFE OF THE PHILOSOPHER: PROFESSOR OLEKSANDR OLEKSANDROVICH MAMALUY (29. 07. 1939 - 06. 12. 2023). The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (70), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-70-1 (in Ukrainian).

Rodian, M. V. (2021). Rozvytok postmodernizmu: Metodolohichni pryntsypy, teorii, zasady [The development of postmodernism: Methodological principles, theories, foundations]. Perspektyvy. Sotsial'no-politychnyi zhurnal, (2), 102-107. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtxpr (in Ukrainian)

Brøvig-Hanssen, Ragnhild та Jones, Ellis. (2023). Remix’s retreat? Content moderation, copyright law and mashup music. Information, Communication & Society, 25(6). URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211026059

Jencks, C. (1991). The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Academy Editions.

Eshelman, R. (2002, квітень). Performatism, or, What Comes After Postmodernism: New Architecture in Berlin. ArtMargins. URL: http://www.artmargins.com/index.php/archive/322-performatism-or-what-comes-after-postmodernism-new-architecture-in-berlin

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.

Fahner, Craig. (2023). INVERTING THE ALGORITHMIC GAZE: CONFRONTING PLATFORM POWER THROUGH MEDIA ARTWORKS (PhD Dissertation, Toronto Metropolitan University and York University). URL: https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Inverting_the_Algorithmic_Gaze_Confronting_Platform_Power_Through_Media_Artworks/26871469?file=48883990

Gretzky, Maria та Dishon, Gideon. (2025). Algorithmic-authors in academia: blurring the boundaries of human and machine knowledge production. AI and Society, 0(0), 1-16. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2452196

Hassan, I. (1987). The Postmodern Turn: Essays on Postmodernism and Culture. In The Postmodern Turn: Essays on Postmodernism and Culture (с. 84–96). Ohio State University Press.

de Mul, J. (1999). Romantic Desire in (Post)modern Art & Philosophy (с. 18–26). State University of New York Press.

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester University Press.

Kirby, Alan. (2009). Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Qiu, J., Cheng, L., та Huang, J. (2025). Charting the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2025-0007

Samuels, R. (2008). Auto-Modernity after Postmodernism: Autonomy and Automation in Culture, Technology, and Education. In T. Mcpherson (Ред.), Digital Youth, Innovation, and the Unexpected (с. 219). The MIT Press.

van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., та Vermeulen, T. (2019). Metamodernism: Period, Structure of Feeling, and Cultural Logic – A case study in Contemporary Autofiction. In R. Askin, F. Beckman, та D. Rudrum (Ред.), New Directions in Philosophy and Literature (с. 41–54). Edinburgh University Press.

Vermeulen, T., та van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677

Vermeulen, T., та van den Akker, R. (2015). Utopia, Sort of: A Case Study in Metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica, 87(1), 55–67.

Zahurska, N. (2022). NEW SINCERITY IN POST-POSTMODERN ART. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (66), 19-26. URL: https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2022-66-1

Zahurska, N. V. (2019). FROM NARCISSISM TO AUTISM: A DIGIMODERNIST VERSION OF POST-POSTMODERN. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (61), 6-12. URL: https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2019-61-1.

Published
2024-12-30
Cited
How to Cite
Perchyk, A., & Bednarskyi, S. (2024). BETWEEN THE QUOTE AND THE CODE IN DIGIMODERN TEXTUALITY: AN INTERPRETATION . The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science", (70), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.26565/2306-6687-2024-70-11