ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION OF THE CALCULATION OF THE COSTS OF DEFENSE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THESES (USING THE EXAMPLE OF OLES HONCHAR DNIPRO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY)
Abstract
The article presents an economic justification for the cost of organizing and conducting the defense of theses of PhD candidates who did not complete a full course of study within the educational and scientific program of a higher education institution. A comparative analysis of regulatory and legal support and financial mechanisms in Ukraine and abroad was conducted. It was found that for a higher education institution, the process of organizing and conducting a defense is associated with additional financial costs, since it includes financing the maintenance of information, library, and material and technical resources, payment for utilities and other services, checking dissertations for plagiarism, issuing diplomas, and also requires the involvement of official opponents and ensuring the work of technical and administrative personnel.
In international practice, two models are distinguished: if the applicant is not currently studying under the educational and scientific program, the institution or the state charges him a special fee, or covers all costs for certification procedures through budget financing or inclusion in the cost of the applicant’s third (educational and scientific) level of higher education.
Using the example of Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, an economic model of cost calculation was developed, taking into account direct and indirect costs associated with the certification procedure and defense of a PhD thesis by applicants who are not graduates of the educational and scientific program of this particular higher education institution.
A transparent approach to establishing the cost of paid services for organizing defense for third-party applicants of the third (educational and scientific) level of higher education is proposed, which ensures the financial stability of the higher education institution, the integrity and openness of the procedure for attestation and defense of the Doctor of Philosophy dissertation.
Downloads
References
Shchypanskyi, P. V., Koretskyi, A. A., Kaposloz, H. V., & Zaitsev, M. M. (2018). Organization of PhD training in the EU countries and Ukraine: state, trends, prospects. Collected papers of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies of the Ivan Cherniakhovskyi NDU of Ukraine, 2(63), pp.136-142. doi: https://doi.org/10.33099/2304-2745/2018-2-63/136-142 (in Ukrainian)
Shevchenko, I., & Zmiiova, I. (2024). Obtaining the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: challenges for the academic community in Ukraine. Novyi Kolehium, 2(114), 23–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.34142/nc.2024.2.23 (in Ukrainian)
Demidova, Yu., Tverytnykova, O., & Iliash, N. (2019). The system of training scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel in Ukraine: retrospective of development and peculiarities of formation. Theory and Practice of Social Systems Management: Philosophy, Psychology, Pedagogy, Sociology, 4, 112–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7782.2019.4.09 (in Ukrainian)
Kalashnikova, S. A., Skyba, Yu. A., Slyusarenko, O. M., & Talanova, Zh. V. (2022). Ensuring the quality of training of doctors of philosophy in the specialty "011 educational and pedagogical sciences" at the Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine: Scientific report at the meeting of the Presidium of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine on May 19, 2022. Bulletin of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, 4(1)б, 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2022.414 (in Ukrainian)
Bidyuk, N., & Tretko, V. (2021). Training of Doctors of Philosophy in Education: The Experience of Great Britain. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, 60, 345-352. doi: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2021-60-345-352 (in Ukrainian)
Gaiduk, O. (2022). Training of future doctors of philosophy at the Institute of Professional Education of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: the goal and objectives of the academic discipline "Comparative Professional Pedagogy". Innovative Professional Education, 5(6), 36–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.32835/2786-619x.2022.5.6.36-39 (in Ukrainian)
Vivek, R., Nanthagopan, Y., Piriyatharshan, S., & Krupskyi, O. P. (2023). Teaching Practices in The New Normal: Qualitative Inquiry (Sri Lanka Case). Advanced Education, 11(23), 170–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.290370
Vergun, V. S., Tsvek, O. V., & Voronko, R. M. (2023). Cost accounting methods and product costing and directions for their improvement. Herald of Lviv University of Trade and Economics Economic Sciences, 69, 30–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1205-2022-69-04 (in Ukrainian)
Harun, H., & Durden, C. (2025). Neoliberalism and sustainability of higher education in Australia. Industry and Higher Education, 39 (5), 485-491. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241296295
Johnes, J., & Perez-Esparrells, C. (2025). The quest for efficiency in higher education in England: lessons learned for developed economies. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32 (5), 2677–2706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13583
Pham, V. T., & Tran-Nam, B. (2021). Estimating unit cost of public university education in Vietnam. Educ Res Policy Prac, 20, 279–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09280-8
Ingram, S. (2023). The financial impact of policy reform on the Australian university sector 1988–2019. High Educ, 86, 1233–1267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00970-1
Ferrero, L.G.P., & Salles-Filho, S.L.M. (2025). Planning and resource allocation models in research‐intensive universities: budget allocation and the search for excellence. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 12, 482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04778-z
Wafa, W., Sharaai, A. H., Matthew, N. K., & Akhundzada, N. A. (2025). Calculation of Higher Education Institution’s Facilities and Services Applying the Life Cycle Costing Approach Contributing Sustainability. Journal of Sustainability Research, 7 (1), art. no. e250016. doi: https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250016
Gölpek, F. (2012). Price of higher education and individual demand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 349-356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.040
Tyagi, U. & Kumar, A. (2026). Hard Money vs. Soft Money and the Battle for Higher Education’s Future: How Universities Can Leverage Both to Survive and Thrive. In S. Hai-Jew (Ed.), Financial Survival in Higher Education (pp. 181-210). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0407-6.ch007
Usyk, V. I., & Skhulukhiia, Yu. V.(2017). Corruption in Higher Education as a Threat to Academic Integrity. Economy and the State, 11, 65–67. Retrieved from http://www.economy.in.ua/?op=1&z=3908&i=13 (in Ukrainian)
Dryhol, O. O. (2023). Corruption Risks in Higher Education within Educational Activities. Current Issues of National Jurisprudence, 2, 96-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/39221476/ (in Ukrainian)
Bondarenko, O. S. (2023). Corruption risks in higher education: types, manifestations and countermeasures. Bulletin of the Criminal Law Association of Ukraine, 1(19). doi: https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2023.19.276784 (in Ukrainian)
Sviezhentsev, M. (2022). The Government approved the procedure for awarding the academic degree of doctor of philosophy: what will change. Suspilne News. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/197268-urad-zatverdiv-poradok-prisudzenna-naukovogo-stupena-doktora-filosofii-so-zminitsa/ (in Ukrainian)
Kolisnyk, L., Meniailo, V., & Nikolaiev, Ye. (2022). New rules for defending the Doctor of Philosophy dissertation: what is wrong? Retrieved from https://www.skeptic.in.ua/phd-thesis-defense-rules-gone-wrong/ (in Ukrainian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
