WHO CAN MORTGAGE TO BUY FINISHED HOUSING? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF A FORMER SOVIET REPUBLIC

doi:10.26565/2524-2547-2025-70-02

Giga Kikoria Business and Technology University, 82, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-7656
Sara Férnandez López University of Santiago de Compostela, 0, Praza do Obradoiro, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-4333

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2025-70-02

Keywords: Housing, Housing Demand, Real estate markets, Consumer Research, Mortgages

Abstract

The housing markets in former Soviet Union countries have undergone substantial transformations since 1991, with mortgage lending emerging as a pivotal instrument driving housing demand and ownership. In Georgia, as in many other post-Soviet states, official data demonstrate a consistent rise in the number of individuals entering the mortgage market to purchase housing, particularly finished housing units. This trend underscores the necessity of understanding the socio-economic factors that influence mortgage uptake among urban residents, particularly in rapidly transforming transitional economies. This study investigates the determinants of mortgage loan acquisition for the purchase of finished housing, using primary survey data collected from a sample of 356 mortgage loan holders in Tbilisi, the capital and largest city of Georgia.

The empirical results indicate that individual income and employment status are the most significant predictors of a household’s decision to secure a mortgage. Higher income levels and stable, formal employment significantly increase the likelihood of mortgage loan approval and uptake. In contrast, demographic variables such as age, gender, and education level were found to have limited predictive power in the decision-making process. These findings highlight the critical role of economic security, labor market integration, and reliable income sources in shaping access to housing finance in transitional economies.

This study contributes to the existing literature in three main ways. First, it offers novel empirical insights into the socio-economic characteristics of mortgage borrowers in Georgia, addressing a substantial gap in the regional literature. Second, it provides a foundational assessment of the Georgian housing finance landscape, serving as a reference point for comparative studies in other former Soviet republics, including Armenia and Azerbaijan. Third, the study delivers practical implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and housing market stakeholders by offering data-driven evidence on the prerequisites for mortgage accessibility in post-socialist urban contexts. In doing so, it enhances the understanding of mortgage dynamics within the broader framework of economic transition, institutional development, and urban transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Giga Kikoria, Business and Technology University, 82, I. Chavchavadze Avenue, Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor

Sara Férnandez López, University of Santiago de Compostela, 0, Praza do Obradoiro, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain

PhD (Economics), Professor

References

Alesina, A. F., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2013). Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(s1), 45–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01100.x

Andrews, D., & Sánchez, A. C. (2011). Drivers of homeownership rates in selected OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 849, 1–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgg9mcwc7jf-en

Anglin, P. M. (1997). Determinants of buyer search in a housing market. Real Estate Economics, 25(4), 567–589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00728

Aristei, D., & Gallo, M. (2012). The drivers of household over-indebtedness and delinquency on mortgage loans: Evidence from Italian microdata. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica, 105, 1–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2135262

Baldwin, J. N. (1987). Public versus private: Not that different, not that consequential. Public Personnel Management, 16(2), 181–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102608701600209

Bargain, O., & Melly, B. (2008). Public sector pay gap in France: New evidence using panel data. IZA Discussion Paper, 3427, 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140163

Bourassa, S. C. (1995). A model of housing tenure choice in Australia. Journal of Urban Economics, 37(2), 161–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1995.1009

Cai, L. & Liu, A. Y.C. (2011). Public–Private Sector Wage Gap in Australia: Variation along the Distribution. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2), 362–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00773.x

Cheng, P., Lin, Zh., & Liu, Y. (2009). Do Women Pay More for Mortgages? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(4), 423–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-009-9214-y

Chiuri, M. C., & Jappelli, T. (2003). Financial Market Imperfections and Home Ownership: A Comparative Study. European Economic Review, 47(5), 857–875. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00273-8

Clark, W.A.V., Deurloo, M.C., & Dieleman, F. M. (1984). Housing Consumption and Residential Mobility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(1), 29–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01432.x

Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (2000). Housing consumption and residential crowding in U.S. housing markets. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(1), 49–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00039

Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kudlyak, M., & Mondragon, J. (2016). Does Greater Inequality Lead to More Household Borrowing? New Evidence from Household Data. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series, 2016-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2016-20

Doling, J. (1976). The Family Life Cycle and Housing Choice. Urban Studies, 13(1), 55–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987620080071

Duca, J. V., & Rosenthal, S. S. (1994). Borrowing constraints and access to owner-occupied housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(3), 301–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02041-Z

Fishbein, A. J., & Woodall, P. (2006). Women are Prime Targets for Subprime Lending. Consumer Federation of America. Retrieved from https://consumerfed.org/pdfs/WomenPrimeTargetsStudy120606.pdf

Ford, J., & Wilcox, S. (1998). Owner occupation, employment and welfare: The impact of changing relationships on sustainable home ownership. Housing Studies, 13(5), 623–638. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039883137

Gardner, J., & Oswald, A. J. (1999). The determinants of job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(4), 595–611. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00156

Gómez-Salvador, R., Lojschová, A., & Westermann, T. (2011). Household sector borrowing in the euro area: A micro data perspective. ECB Occasional Paper Series, 125. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1791565

Haurin, D. R., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2007). The influence of household formation on homeownership rates across time and race. Real Estate Economics, 35(4), 411–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2007.00194.x

Kunze, A. (2017). The gender wage gap in developed countries. In S. L. Averett, L. M. Argys, & S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy (pp. 369–394). Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.11

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lansing, J. B., & Kish, L. (1957). Family life cycle as an independent variable. American Sociological Review, 22(5), 512–519. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2089474

Leuvensteijn, M. van, & Koning, P. (2004). The effect of home-ownership on labor mobility in the Netherlands. Journal of Urban Economics, 55(3), 580–596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.02.002

Loschiavo, D. (2021). Household debt and income inequality: Evidence from Italian survey data. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(1), 61–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12454

Anglin, P. M. (1988). The sensitivity of consumer search to wages. Economics Letters, 28(3), 209–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(88)90100-4

Mathema, A., Salukvadze, J., & Budovitch, M. (2015). Georgia Urban Strategy: Priority Area IV – Housing. World Bank. Georgia Housing – Final Report

Melly, B. (2005). Public-private sector wage differentials in Germany: Evidence from quantile regression. Empirical Economics, 30(2), 505–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-005-0251-y

Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 281–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9050-9

Namchavadze, B. (2018). Construction Sector in Georgia. Tbilisi: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Norway .

Stephens, M. (2005). A critical analysis of housing finance reform in a “super” home-ownership state: The case of Armenia. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1795–1815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500231712

Struyk, R. J., & Marshall, S. (1974). The determinants of household home ownership. Urban Studies, 11(3), 289–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987420080551

Struyk, R., Roy, F., Rabenhorst, C., & Kopeiken, A. (2004). Emerging mortgage finance in Armenia. Policy Documentation Center. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/display/11871948

Tan, T.-H. (2008). Determinants of homeownership in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(3), 318–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.11.006

Vale, S., & Camões, F. (2020). I feel wealthy: A major determinant of Portuguese households’ indebtedness? Empirical Economics, 58, 1953–1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1602-9

Valiyev, A. (2014). The post-Communist growth machine: The case of Baku, Azerbaijan. Cities, 41(Supplement 1), S45–S53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.009

Veritas Brown. (2020). The residential market at a glance. Tbilisi: Cushman & Wakefield Georgia.

Wang, Y.-D., Yang, C., & Wang, K.-Y. (2012). Comparing public and private employees’ job satisfaction and turnover. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 557–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601204100310

Yilmazer, T., & DeVaney, S. A. (2005). Household debt over the life cycle. Financial Services Review, 14(4), 285–304.

Zhu, L. Y., & Meeks, C. B. (1994). Effects of low-income families' ability and willingness to use consumer credit on subsequent outstanding credit balances. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 28(2), 403–422.