METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEMS OF AIR TRANSPORT ENTERPRISES

  • Maryna Petchenko State University of Information and Communication Technologies, 7, Solomyanska str., Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1104-5717
Keywords: Innovative Ecosystem, Development, Strategizing, Methodology, Coevolution, Synergism

Abstract

The work is aimed at developing and justifying a co-evolutionary and synergistic approach to the strategic development of innovative ecosystems, based on the concept of entelechy of the participants of this ecosystem, which is connected with the need to intensify the innovative activities of air transport enterprises. Based on the principles of the functioning of the innovative ecosystem in terms of ensuring a long-term synergistic effect from the interaction of actors, its adaptive properties, the ability to self-organize and evolve, self-improvement and development of the potential of actors, the methodological foundations of the author's approach are formed in the work, which includes: close harmonious interaction of the participants of the innovative ecosystem; compatibility and mutual complementarity of actors; joint evolution of ecosystem participants; continuous improvement based on acquired experience; adaptation of each participant to the conditions of the innovation environment, and the ecosystem as a whole - to its unique market niche; proactive behavior of participants; rational or optimal composition of actors with sufficient resource provision; co-evolution, based on the selective analysis of the contribution of each actor to the efficiency of the ecosystem, determining the best combinations of participants and the structure of the ecosystem to maximize the achievement of strategic goals with limited resources; a polycentric approach to management, which increases the flexibility and adaptability of the ecosystem due to rapid response to changes and prompt decision-making by actors in their areas of responsibility; an induced innovation approach that creates a close interaction between participants and the innovation environment to support innovation development. The proposed synthesis of methodological approaches and provisions makes it possible to substantiate the principles of effective interaction of actors both among themselves and within the innovative ecotope to achieve the evolution of the internal potential of actors and synergistic implementation of embedded system capabilities. The prospect of further research is the development of methodical approaches to the strategic development of innovative ecosystems of air transport enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maryna Petchenko, State University of Information and Communication Technologies, 7, Solomyanska str., Kyiv, 03110, Ukraine

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor

References

Ashby, W.R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. John Wiley & Sons.

Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An Introduction. Springer Ser. Synergetics. 3rd rev. and enlarged ed. edition. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

Haken, H. (1987). Advanced Synergetics. Springer Ser. Synergetics. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag.

Haken, H. (2004). Synergetics: Introduction and Advanced Topics. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

Visscher, K., Hahn, K., & Konrad, K. (2021). Innovation ecosystem strategies of industrial firms: A multilayered approach to alignment and strategic positioning. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 619-631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12429

Vosman, L., Coenen, T. B. J., Volker, L., & Visscher, K. (2023). Collaboration and innovation beyond project boundaries: exploring the potential of an ecosystem perspective in the infrastructure sector. Construction Management and Economics, 41(6), 457-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2165695

Liu, B., Shao, Y.-F., Liu, G., & Ni, D. (2022). An Evolutionary Analysis of Relational Governance in an Innovation Ecosystem. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093044

Hou, H., & Shi, Y. (2021). Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination. Technovation, 100, 102193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102193

Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 59–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.016

Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2021). An ecosystem perspective synthesis of co-creation research. Industrial Marketing Management, 99, 79–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.10.002

Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2020). Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation. International Journal of Production Economics, 228, 107735. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735

Bacon, E., Williams, M. D., & Davies, G. (2020). Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations. Journal of Business Research, 115(2), 307–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.005

Bhargava, H. K. (2021). The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue sharing, and platform design. Management Science, 68(7), 5233-5251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4126

Cenamor, J., & Frishammar, J. (2021). Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products. Research Policy, 50(1), 104148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104148

Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Guo, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Research on the coordination mechanism of value cocreation of innovation ecosystems: Evidence from a Chinese artificial intelligence enterprise. Complexity, 6, 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7629168

Pomegbe, W., Li, W., Dogbe, C., & Otoo, C. (2021). Closeness or opportunistic behavior? Mediating the business ecosystem governance mechanisms and coordination relationship. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 28(3), 530–552. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0013

Mandal, P. C. (2022). Management of Innovation in Organizations and the Innovation Imperative. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 13(1), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIDE.311516

Quental, T. B., & Marshall, C. R. (2013). How the Red Queen Drives Terrestrial Mammals to Extinction. Science, 341, 290-292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239431

Greenacre, P., Gross, R., & Speirs, J. (2012). Innovation Theory: A review of the literature. Retrieved from https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/icept/Innovation-review---ICEPT-working-paper-version-(16.05.12).pdf

Lozhachevska, O., Bashmakov, M., Petchenko, M., Orlova-Kurilova, O., Bereza, I., Krasnoshtan, O., & Miroshnichenko, O. (2023). Technological management of innovations in logistics. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 46(2), 113-123. doi: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2023.12

Published
2025-04-06
How to Cite
Petchenko, M. (2025). METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE ECOSYSTEMS OF AIR TRANSPORT ENTERPRISES. Social Economics, (69), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2025-69-15
Section
MANAGEMENT