TAX BEHAVIOR: AVOIDANCE VS EVASION (ANALYSIS OF INDICATORS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD)

  • Tamara Merkulova V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine; University of Barcelona, 585, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, Barcelona, 08007, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-5593
Keywords: Behaviour Economics, Tax Behaviour, Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of behavioural aspects of taxation. A significant problem of effective taxation is taxpayers’ reduction of tax liabilities through shortcomings in tax laws, uncertainty in their statements, direct violation of tax norms, and the use of illegal schemes to reduce the tax base. Taxpayer behaviour is of key importance for the effectiveness of tax policy, filling the budget, and performing state functions, which determines the relevance of this issue.

The object of the analysis presented in the article is tax behaviour types: tax avoidance and tax evasion. The research purpose is to identify the relationship between GDP, as a general indicator of socio-economic development, and tax revenue loss due to tax abuse. Taking into account the important role of offshores in legal and illegal schemes for reducing tax liabilities, an indicator of offshore wealth was involved in the analysis. The preliminary research hypotheses are based on the methodology of behavioral economics. The identification of the relationship between indicators was carried out using correlation analysis.

A comparative analysis of the character and strength of the relationship between variables carried out for the sample of 174 countries of the world and the set of the European Union (27 countries) uncovered significant differences between these sets. The most important finding is that the strength of the relationship between GDP and each tax behaviour type in the European Union is the same and stronger than in the general set, where tax avoidance dominates tax evasion.

Analysis of the European Union countries sample showed that offshore wealth has a very close relationship with losses caused by both tax behaviour types, in contrast to the general set of countries, where tax avoidance has a weaker relationship (correlation 0.64 versus 0.91). This confirms the more active involving offshore technologies in tax behaviour in European countries compared to the general sample.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tamara Merkulova, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine; University of Barcelona, 585, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, Barcelona, 08007, Spain

D.Sc. (Economics), Professor

References

Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

Dubrovsky, V., Cherkashin, V., & Hetman, O. (2021). Comparative analysis of the fiscal effect of the use of tax evasion/avoidance tools in Ukraine. CASE Ukraine Center for Socio-Economic Research and Institute of Socio-Economic Transformation. Retrieved from http://iset-ua.org/images/Doslidzennya-shem-2021-final.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Pokatayeva, O. V., & Kucherova, G. Yu. (2015). Factors of conscious tax payment: experience of EU countries. Theoretical and practical aspects of economics and intellectual property, 1(11), 47-52. (in Ukrainian)

Mitu, N. E. (2016). Taxpayer behaviour: typologies and influence factors. Journal of Political Sciences, 49, 80-82.

Baranov, S. O. (2016). Tax evasion as a major factor of the shadow economy. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 12, 102–106. (in Ukrainian)

Andrushchenko, V. L. (2006). Conditions and ideals of tax culture. Professional ethics of the employee of the state tax service as a component of the ethics of the civil servant of Ukraine (pp. 13-17). Irpin National University of DPS of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Voinova, T., & Pavlenko, O. (2000). Some issues of formation of tax culture in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Tax Service of Ukraine, 37, 55–59. (in Ukrainian)

Altman, M. (2006). Handbook of Contemporary Behavioral Economics: Foundations and Developments. New York: Routledge.

Barabash, L. (2021). Behavioral aspects of harmonious development of the tax system of Ukraine. Social Economics, 61, 72-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2021-61-07

Luhina, N. A., & Poleyko, I. Yu. (2019). Social determinants of tax evasion. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 6, 342-344. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2019-6/81 (in Ukrainian)

Jimenez, P., & Iyer, G. S. (2016). Tax compliance in a social setting: The influence of social norms, trust in government, and perceived fairness on taxpayer compliance. Advances in Accounting, 34, 17-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.07.001

Kirchler, E., & Alm, J. (2012). Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation. Economic Analysis & Policy, 42(2), 133-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(12)50016-0

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, K. (2017). Impetus. How to help people make the right choices [Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness]. Kyiv: Our format. (in Ukrainian)

Braithwaite, V. (2002). Taxing Democracy. England. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The «slippery slope» framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Smith, V. L. (1994). Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 113–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.113

Belianin, A., & Novarese, M. (2005). Trust, Communication and Equilibrium Behaviour in Public Goods Game: A Cross-country Experimental study. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9311687.pdf

Mittoni, L., & Bartolami, F. (2007). Free riding and norms of control: self determination and imposition. An experimental comparison. CEEL Working Papers 0704, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.

Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public good experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980-994. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.203194

Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In: J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.). The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press.

Merkulova, T., & Bitkova, T. (2014). Owner/Manager Dilemma in the Context of Tax Evasion: Models and Experiments. Current Problems of Management of Modern Organizations in Poland and in Ukraine: monographs (pp. 122-141). Lodz: Lodz University of Technology.

Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
Merkulova, T. (2024). TAX BEHAVIOR: AVOIDANCE VS EVASION (ANALYSIS OF INDICATORS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD). Social Economics, (68). https://doi.org/10.26565/2524-2547-2024-68-04
Section
ECONOMICS