Regularities of The Use of Adjectives to Describe the Emotional States of Participants in the Training of Communicative Skills

  • Маріанна Вікторівна Церковна Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, Kharkiv, Bursatsky Uzviz, 4, 61057. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4585-9391
  • Альберт Олександрович Церковний Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, Kharkiv, Bursatsky Uzviz, 4, 61057.
Keywords: communication skills training, typology of behavior, interpersonal interaction, the frequency of use adjectives, cluster analysis

Abstract

The article deals with the patterns of behavior of students who participate in the training of communication skills. Observation of different participants in standardized situations revealed that there are recurring personality characteristics of responding to the situation of interpersonal interaction. The individual peculiarities of use by participants of adjectives during the training process are discussed. Discusses the patterns that are associated with the peculiarities of the personality of the participants and are manifested in the performance of training exercises. The main theories and tests related to the identification of typological personality traits are analyzed. The introduction of parameters specific to the description of behavior allows distinguishing typological groups.

To solve the clustering problem, a non-numerical description of the elements of behavior elements was used. The matrix of output data was created from the set of descriptions of the adjectives of the sample of participants. An Elbow method was used to determine the optimal number of clusters. The matrix was subjected to an agglomeration cluster analysis procedure using the k-medium method for cluster integration. It was found that most of the emotional states and behavioral reactions, which were described by adjectives, as a result of analysis can be the basis for the distribution of participants in the types, depending on the frequency of manifestation of the interrelated behavioral features.

For representatives of each cluster, specific forms of motivation are offered. Proposals for improving the quality of the facilitator training team are put forward. The authors propose the use of the typology developed by them to motivate and predict the behavior of participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven Model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language of trait descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300-307.

Corr, P. J. & Matthews, G. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlacic, B., Di Blas, L., … Katigbak, M.S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160-173.

De Raad, B., Timmerman, M. E., Morales-Vives, F., Renner, W., Bareld, D. P. H., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2017). The Psycho-Lexical Approach in Exploring the Field of Values: A Reply to Schwartz/ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 444-451. doi: 10.1177/0022022117692677.

Eysenck, H.J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, or 3? – criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.

Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.

Miserandino, M. (2012). Personality Psychology: Foundations and Findings. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Miserandino, M., & Porter, S. (2016). Regulation and motivation: Self-determination theory. Personality psychology: Foundations and findings. Toronto, ON: Pearson.

Ross, B. (Ed.). (2015). Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Volume 62. 1st Edition. Urbana, Ill.: Academic Press.

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096.

Taylor, E. (2009). The Mystery of Personality: A History of Psychodynamic Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Published
2019-06-07
Cited
How to Cite
Церковна, М. В., & Церковний, А. О. (2019). Regularities of The Use of Adjectives to Describe the Emotional States of Participants in the Training of Communicative Skills. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology, (66), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.26565/2225-7756-2019-66-08