ON THE HISTORICAL DISCRETENESS OF THE FUNCTION OF LANGUAGE AND AUTHORSHIP IN THE CONTEXT OF MICHEL FOUCAULT’S “THE ORDER OF THINGS”

Keywords: episteme, language, authorship, the Death of the Author

Abstract

The article analyzes forms of authorship that were characteristic of Western culture at specific periods and emerged or disappeared in connection with the emergence or disappearance of the corresponding function of language. The analysis was carried out based on the materials and methodology proposed by Michel Foucault in his fundamental work "The Order of Things," involving the works of other researchers. It is noted that the discreteness of the function of language in culture, as proven by Foucault, undermines not only the notion of the foundational function of the subject but also the notion of the invariance and universality of the author's function. Based on descriptions of the function of language within each of the three "epistemes," it is demonstrated that in different periods of the history of Western culture, "authorship" was understood as various cultural practices that are difficult to reduce to a single concept. In conclusion, three types of authorship that emerged in Western culture during different historical periods were identified, named, and described: "Author-Augur" (late antiquity – mid-17th century), "Author-Creator" (mid-17th century – early 19th century), and "Author-Medium" (early 19th century – 20th century). The article argues that the "death of the author," in the context of "The Order of Things," is a consequence of the decline of the "classical episteme" – conditions of the possibility of knowledge in which "representation" was the only locus of the world's existence, and under the Cartesian "cogito ergo sum," according to Foucault, what was actually implied was: "I think, therefore the world exists." After it was revealed within the "modern episteme" that the being of man is outside the being of language, the classical Creator was replaced by the Medium. The text separately explains how the proposed concept of the "Medium" fundamentally differs from the "Scripter" (Roland Barthes) and from the so-called "Simple Performer of Pure Ritual" (Michel Foucault).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Loiko , V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD in Philosophy,

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy

named after Professor J. B. Schad

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Svobody sqr., 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Benveniste, É. (1973). Indo-European language and society (E. Palmer, Trans.; S. L. Lieberman, Ed.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.

Blanchot, M. (1982). The space of literature (A. Smock, Trans.). Lincoln, NE, London, UK: University of Nebraska Press.

Foucault, M. (1969). L'archéologie du savoir. Paris, France: Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Paris, France: Gallimard.

Freud, S. (1916). Leonardo da Vinci: A psychosexual study of an infantile reminiscence (A. A. Brill, Trans.). New York, NY: Yard.

Genette, G. (1969). Figures (Vol. 2). Paris, France: Editions du Seuil.

Jacobson, R. (1960). Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge, MA: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, & New York, NY; London, UK: John Wiley and Sons.

Mallarmé, S. (1914a). Poesis (C. Maurras, Ed.). Paris, France: Nouvelle Revue Française.

Mallarmé, S. (1956). Selected prose poems, essays and letters (B. Cook, Trans.; H. Mondor, Ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Mallarmé, S. (1914b). Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard. Paris, France: Nouvelle Revue Française.

Shakespeare, W. (1986). Hamlet, prince of Denmark (L. Hrebinka, Trans.). In Shakespeare, W. Collected works in six volumes: Volume 5 (pp. 5-118). Kyiv, Ukraine: Dnipro. (In Ukrainian).

Published
2024-06-21
Cited
How to Cite
Loiko , O. (2024). ON THE HISTORICAL DISCRETENESS OF THE FUNCTION OF LANGUAGE AND AUTHORSHIP IN THE CONTEXT OF MICHEL FOUCAULT’S “THE ORDER OF THINGS”. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (70), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2024-70-5