SCIENTIFIC WAYS OF MASTERING UNCERTAINTY IN A TURBULENT SOCIETY
Abstract
Modern society is characterized by permanent challenges that create a situation of the need to preserve the key parameters of social development, taking into account temporary and situational deviations from the strategic direction of this development. The key to understanding the problem of determination in modern science can be the identification of regularities in the development of science itself. On the one hand, there is no doubt about the need to systematize knowledge and adhere to clear scientific criteria – especially in a situation of exponential growth in the volume and variety of knowledge possessed by modern society. On the other hand, science constantly abandons some part of its recent postulates, which turn out to be only partially proven hypotheses that have only partial truth. In the end, only the basic scientific criteria and the instruction for incessant internal criticism and self-improvement of science remain beyond doubts and changes, while the substantive part of science is in a state of permanent transformation and refinement. In a postmodern society, such a methodological and worldview instruction of science receives additional ideological legitimation thanks to postmodern principles of knowledge organization – such as rhizomaticity, discursiveness, narrativism, intertextuality, etc. The signs of science at its current stage of development are: a significant increase in the specific weight of interdisciplinary and interdisciplinary research; emergence of new integrated sciences; the use of accurate methods in the study of methodological and epistemological problems of science and the demarcation of knowledge; search for new forms of research adequate to the latest specificity of the subject of the socio-humanitarian disciplinary spectrum; an intensive analysis of the relationships between the epistemological and axiological foundations of socio-humanitarian science. The research approach, which is based on the understanding of the factor of instability, fully meets the modern scientific and social demand for the designation of the content format and problematic challenges of modernity, provides an opportunity to grasp new cognitive horizons and slices of reality, which are characterized by signs of becoming, nonlinearity, uncertainty – that is, almost all attributes of a turbulent society.
Downloads
References
Aristotle. (2022). Metaphysics / trans. from Ancient Greek by O. Panych. Kyiv: Tempora. (In Ukrainian).
Bauman, Z. (2008). Globalization. Consequences for man and society / trans. from English by I. Andrushchenko, M. Vynnytskyi. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Publishing House. (In Ukrainian).
Boychenko, M. I. (2010). Social-philosophical vision of the system-forming nature of worldview. Bulletin of NTUU "KPI" Philosophy. Psychology Pedagogy. (3), 18-22. (In Ukrainian).
Wittgenstein, L. (1995). Tractatus logico-philosophicus / trans. from German by E. Popovych. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus; Philosophical studies. Kyiv: Osnovy, p. 5-86. (In Ukrainian).
Hume, D. (2003). Treatise on human nature / trans. from English by P. Nasada. Kyiv: Universe. (In Ukrainian).
Descartes, R. (2020). Metaphysical works / trans. from French by V. Andrushko, S. Gatalska, O. Khoma, A. Baumeister. Ed. by O. Khoma. Kharkiv: Folio. (In Ukrainian).
Deleuze, J., & Guattari, F. (1996). Capitalism and schizophrenia: Anti-Oedipus / trans. from French by O. Shevchenko. Kyiv: Karme-Sinto. (In Ukrainian).
Kuhn, T. (2001). The structure of scientific revolutions / trans. from English. Kyiv: Port-Royal. (In Ukrainian).
Ajdukiewicz, K. & Giedymin, J. (1966). From the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences. Studia Logica 19: 9-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02186718
Aron, R. (1961). Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity. Trans. by G. J. Irwin. Boston: Beacon Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bruno, J. (1887). The Heroic Enthusiasts (An Ethical Poem). Trans. by L. Williams. London George Redway York Street, Covent Garden. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/19817/19817-h/19817-h.htm
Janssen, M., & Renn, J. (2015). History: Einstein was no lone genius. Nature, 527, 298–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/527298a
Lubowitz, J. H.; Brand, J. C.; & Rossi, M. J. (2018). Two of a Kind: Multiple Discovery AKA Simultaneous Invention is the Rule. Arthroscopy, 34(8): 2257-2258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.027.
Lübbe, H. (1971). Theorie und Entscheidung: Studien zum Primat der praktischen Vernunft. Freiburg: Rombach.
Pauncaré, H. (1905). Science and Hypothesis. Authorized trans. by J. B. Halsted. New York: The Science Press.
Planck, M. (1968). Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. New York: Philosophical Library.
Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
Rao, J. R. (1995). Eventual determinism: using probabilistic means to achieve deterministic ends. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, vol. 2, pp. 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1995.375480.
Schopenhauer, A. (1974). On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
Copyright (c) 2022 Олег Кубальський
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.