IDEOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION SYSTEM: DYNAMICS AND CONSEQUENCES
Abstract
The article analyzes the ideological support of the life cycle of the industrial education system. The dynamics of such a system in time is estimated, as well as the influence of ideology on the formation of the information education system at the beginning of the XXI century. The life cycle of education is considered as a multi-stage process, which is characterized by both unpredictable changes in its properties and the presence of predictable parameters. The development of the education system is mediated by the division of social labor and is limited in time and space by the properties of the “social organism” of a particular civilization. The life cycle of the industrial education system consists of four stages: origin (mid XVI – late XVII centuries); growth (late XVII – late XIX century); maturity (late XIX century – 70s of the XX century); decline (70s of the XX – beginning of the XXI century). At the stage of origin, dominated predominantly the religious-state form of ideology, which was spontaneous in origin, did not have a formalized ideologeme and was initiated from religious consciousness, as well as theological philosophy, cultivated a matrix of religious values. At this stage the state, although it participated in the management of human behavior, was in secondary roles and performed the corresponding functions with the help of violence. At the stage of growth, ideology received a theoretical basis, corresponding social movements also appeared, the most powerful of which were liberalism and Marxism, formed two ideologically opposite social systems: capitalist and socialist (with corresponding educational systems, human ideals and the ultimate goals of the class struggle). At the stage of maturity, ideology brought social systems to the plane of technocratism, which happened as a result of maximizing the role of science and rationality. Because of this, other ways of producing socially significant ideas were blocked, that is, their sources such as art, theater, cinema, religion, etc. At the stage of decline, the ideology of radical rationalism found itself in the horizon of the ideas of multiculturalism. Since powerful migratory movements of the population arose on the territory of the African, European and American continents, these processes naturally raised the question of new cross-cultural social structures, as well as the modernization of systems of modern general and vocational education.
Downloads
References
/References
Adizes, I. K. (1979). Organizational Passages-Diagnosing and Treating Lifecycle Problems of Organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 8(1), 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(79)90001-9.
Adizes, I. K. (1998). Managing Corporate Lifecycles: How to Get to and Stay at the Top. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press.
Althusser L. (2010). Ideology and State Ideological Apparatuses (Fragment). (V. Artiukh, Trans.) Journal of Social Criticism “Spilne”, 3: Education Policy. Retrieved from https://commons.com.ua/uk/ideologiya-ta-derzhavni-ideologichni-aparati/. (Original work published 1970). (In Ukrainian).
Bekh, V. P., & Malik, I. V. (2009). Technocratism in the Discourse of Higher School Problems. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Publishing House. (In Ukrainian).
Greiner, L. (1972, July – August). Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. Harvard Business Review, 37–48. Retrieved from https://www.achievemission.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Evolution-and-Revolution-as-Organizations-Grow-Harvard-Business-Review-copy.pdf.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). Aesthetics: In 4 Vols. (Vol. 1). (B. H. Stolpner et al., Trans.). Moscow: Iskusstvo. (Original work published 1835). (In Russian).
Katz D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kimberly, J. R., & Miles, R. H. (1980). The Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Koriahina, S. V. (2004). Economic Evaluation and Planning of the Life Cycle of Enterprise Development. (PhD Thesis). Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University. (In Ukrainian).
Lippitt, G. L., & Schmidt, W. H. (1967, November). Crises in a Developing Organization. Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 102–112. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1967/11/crises-in-a-developing-organization.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161–1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161.
Milner, B. Z. (2002). Organization Theory. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russian).
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33.
Shatskaya, E. Yu. (2010). Management of the Organization and Its Stage of the Life Cycle. Basic Principles for Building the Concept of Research of the Organization Life Cycle. Russian Entrepreneurship, 151(1-2), 38–41. (In Russian).
Shvartsman, K. А. (1989). Philosophy and Education: A Critical Analysis of Non-Marxist Concepts. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russian).
Shyrokova, H. V. (2008). Life Cycle of the Organization: Concepts and Russian Practice. Saint Petersburg: Higher School of Management; St. Petersburg University Publishing House. (In Russian).
Skotna, N. (2005). A Person in a Divided Civilization: Education, Worldview, Actions. Lviv: Ukrainian Technologies. (In Ukrainian).
Toffler, A. (2000). The Third Wave. (A. I. Yevsa, Trans.). Kyiv: Vsesvit. (Original work published 1980). (In Ukrainian).
Torbert, W. R. (1974–1975). Pre-bureaucratic and Post-bureaucratic Stages of Organization Development. Interpersonal Development, 5(1), 1–25.
Whetten, D. A. (1987). Organizational Growth and Decline Processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 335–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002003.
Альтюссер Л. Ідеологія та державні ідеологічні апарати (уривок) / пер. з фр. В. Артюх. Журнал соціальної критики «Спільне». 2010. № 3: Політика освіти. URL: https://commons.com.ua/uk/ideologiya-ta-derzhavni-ideologichni-aparati/.
Бех В. П., Малик I. В. Технократизм у дискурсі проблем вищої школи: монографія / ред. В. П. Бех. Київ: Видавництво НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова, 2009. 263 с.
Гегель Г. В. Ф. Эстетика: в 4-х т.; т. 1. М.: Искусство, 1968. 312 с.
Корягіна С. В. Економічна оцінка та планування життєвого циклу розвитку підприємства: дис. … канд. економ. наук: 08.06.01. Львів: Національний університет «Львівська політехніка», 2004. 180 с.
Мильнер Б. З. Теория организации. М.: Инфра-М, 2002. 558 с.
Скотна Н. Особа у розколотій цивілізації: освіта, світогляд, дії. Львів: Українські технології, 2005. 384 с.
Тоффлер Е. Третя Хвиля / пер. з англ. А. І. Євса. Київ: Всесвіт, 2000. 480 с.
Шацкая Е. Ю. Управление организацией и ее стадия жизненного цикла. Основы построения концепции исследования жизненного цикла организации. Российское предпринимательство. 2010. Том 151. № 1 (2). С. 38–41.
Шварцман К. А. Философия и воспитание: Критический анализ немарксистских концепций. М.: Издательство политической литературы, 1989. 208 с.
Широкова Г. В. Жизненный цикл организации: концепции и российская практика. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмента; Изд. дом СПбГУ, 2008. 480 с.
Adizes I. K. Managing Corporate Lifecycles: How to Get to and Stay at the Top. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press, 1998. 460 p.
Adizes I. K. Organizational Passages-Diagnosing and Treating Lifecycle Problems of Organizations. Organizational Dynamics. 1979. Vol 8. No 1. pp. 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(79)90001-9.
Greiner L. Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. Harvard Business Review. 1972 (July – August). pp. 37–48. URL: https://www.achievemission.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Evolution-and-Revolution-as-Organizations-Grow-Harvard-Business-Review-copy.pdf.
Katz D., Kahn R. L. The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978. 848 p.
Kimberly J. R., Miles R. H. The Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1980. 492 p.
Lippitt G. L., Schmidt W. H. Crises in a Developing Organization. Harvard Business Review. 1967 (November). pp. 102–112. URL: https://hbr.org/1967/11/crises-in-a-developing-organization.
Miller D., Friesen P. H. A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science. 1984. Vol. 30. Issue 10. pp. 1161–1183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161.
Miller D., Friesen P. H. Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link. Strategic Management Journal. 1983. Issue 4. pp. 221–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250040304.
Quinn R. E., Cameron K. Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence. Management Science. 1983. Vol. 29. Issue 1. pp. 33–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33.
Torbert W. R. Pre-bureaucratic and Post-bureaucratic Stages of Organization Development. Interpersonal Development. 1974–1975. Vol. 5. Issue 1. pp. 1–25.
Whetten D. A. Organizational Growth and Decline Processes. Annual Review of Sociology. 1987. Vol. 13. pp. 335–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002003.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.