THE SECULARISM CRISIS AS A CONTINUATION OF SECULARIZATION
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to describe secularism, secularization and secularity in their relationship with the metaphysical and post-metaphysical philosophizing. The objective of the research is to analyze and compare the sense of the term secularism, secularization and secularity in metaphysical and post-metaphysical philosophizing. The scientific novelty of the research is that secularism is seen as an ideology derived from secularization and inextricably linked with the metaphysical constructions of modernism and secularity as a natural consequence of the ongoing process of secularization in the post-metaphysical paradigm of thinking. Post-secular philosophy is philosophy after secular ontology and epistemology have been criticized; after we have been aware of the secular as a framework that relentlessly dictates the specific outlines of our experience, but which we are free to deploy in any way that impresses us; after we have taken in quotation marks all the usual secular divisions and wondered whether it is possible to live, feel and think differently. Speaking of post-secular philosophy, it is impossible to avoid the question of what is meant by secular, which in this post-secular seems to be overcome. To answer this question, it is necessary to distinguish between secularism, secularization and secularity, because these concepts are not equivalent. The author understands secularism as an ideology that presupposes the disappearance of religion, the “disenchantment” of the world, the liberation of man and humanity from all sorts of charms, especially religious. Secularization is the positive way in which society responds to the call of its own religious tradition. Secularization does not eliminate religion as such, but only some forms of religiosity that are incompatible with the new vision of reality. Thus, by secularization the author means a certain process of changing the status of religious faith in the public consciousness. Secularism is an ideology according to which a person criticizes everything religious, including religious institutions, and also believes that non-religious and anti-religious principles should be the basis of human morality. The term secularity refers either to the state of consciousness of a modern subject who has ceased to be religious or for whom religious faith has been replaced by modern experience; or the state of modern institutions and practices that operate outside any connection with religion. Completion of metaphysics means loss of confidence in any metanarratives, including secularism. The prefix “post” applies to the present era, when we speak of the end of secularism, and by no means the end of secularity.
Downloads
References
/References
Berger, P. (2011). Unfinished Concept. Religiovedcheskie issledovaniya – Religious studies, 1–2 (5–6), 103–110. (In Russian).
Berger, P. (2012). Falsified Secularization. Gosudarstvo, Religiya, Czerkov’ v Rossii i za Rubezhom – State, Religion, Church in Russia and Abroad, 2 (30), 8–20. (In Russian).
Berger, P., Davie, G., & Focas, E. (2008). Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Berger, P. L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001.
Casanova, J. (2007). Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. In P. Beyer & L. Beaman (Eds.), Religion, Globalization and Culture (pp. 101–120). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154070.i-608.39.
Casanova, J. (2017). On the Other Side of Secularization: The Religious and Secular Dynamics of our Global Era: Collected Works. (O. Panich, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh i litera. (In Ukrainian).
Connoly, W. (2000). Why I am not a Secularist. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Cox, H. (1995). Secular City: Secularization and Urbanization in Theological Perspective. (O. Bobrova, K. Turovskaya, Trans.). Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura – Eastern Literature. (Original work published 1965). (In Russian).
Epstein, M. (2017). Projective Dictionary of the Humanities. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie – New Literary Review. (In Russian).
Glasner, P. E. (1977). The Sociology of Secularization: A Critique of a Concept. L.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hadden, J. K. (1987). Toward Desacralizing Secularization Theory. Social Forces, 3 (65), 587–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2578520.
Kyrlezhev, A. (2013). Secularism and Post-secularism in Russia and in the World. Otechestvennye Zapiski – Domestic Notes, 1. Retrieved from http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/otechestvennye-zapiski/o1-2013/19621-sekulyarizm-i-postsekulyarizm-v-rossii-i-v-mire.html. (In Russian).
Lipovetsky, G. (2001). The Era of Emptiness. Essays on Contemporary Individualism. (V. Kuznetsov, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’. (Original work published 1983). (In Russian).
Martin, D. (1969). The Religious and the Secular: Studies in Secularization. L.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
On the Power of the Powerless: Dialogue with John D. Caputo. (2007). In J. W. Robbins (Ed.), After the Death of God. N. Y.: Columbia University Press.
Secularization. (2000–2001). In New Philosophical Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH6e47248e60a3b72aebfc6e?p.s=TextQuery. (In Russian).
Stepan, A. (2001). The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the “Twin Tolerations”. In A. Stepan, Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (2013). A Secular Age (Book 1). (O. Panich, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh i litera. (Original work published 2007). (In Ukrainian).
Weber, M. (1994). Economic Ethics of World Religions. In M. Weber, Favorites. The Image of Society (pp. 43–77). (М. I. Levin, Trans.; E. Balashova, Ed.). Moscow: Yurist. (Original work published 1921). (In Russian).
Watson, P. (2017). The Age of Nothing. How We Have Sought to Live Since the Death of God. (M. Zavalov & N. Kholmogorova, Trans.). Moscow: EKSMO. (Original work published 2014). (In Russian).
Whistler, D., & Smith, A. P. (2010). What is Continental Philosophy of Religion Now? Editors’ Introduction. In A. P Smith & D. Whistler (Eds.), After the Postsecular and the Postmodern: New Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Бергер П. Недоработанная концепция. Религиоведческие исследования. 2011. № 1–2 (5–6). С. 10–110.
Бергер П. Фальсифицированная секуляризация. Государство, религия, Церковь в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 2 (30). С. 8–20.
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий мира / пер. М. И. Левина. Вебер М. Избранное. Образ общества. М.: Юрист, 1994. С. 43–77.
Казанова Х. По той бік секуляризації: релігійна та секулярна динаміка нашої глобальної доби / пер. з англ. О. Панича. К.: Дух і літера, 2017. 264 с.
Кокс Х. Мирской град: секуляризация и урбанизация в теологическом аспекте / пер. с англ. О. Бобровой, К. Гуровской. М.: Издательская фирма «Восточная литература» РАН, 1995. 263 с.
Кырлежев А. Секуляризм и постсекуляризм в России и в мире [Электронный ресурс]. Отечественные записки. 2013. № 1. URL: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/otechestvennye-zapiski/o1-2013/19621-sekulyarizm-i-postsekulyarizm-v-rossii-i-v-mire.html (дата обращения 24.05.2020).
Липовецки Ж. Эпоха пустоты. Эссе о современном индивидуализме / пер. с франц. В. Кузнецова. Спб.: Владимир Даль, 2001. 336 с.
Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. [Электронный ресурс] / предс. научно-ред. совета В. С. Степин. М.: Мысль, 2000–2001. URL: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH6e47248e60a3b72aebfc6e?p.s=TextQuery (дата обращения 24.05.2020).
Тейлор Ч. Секулярна доба. Книга перша / пер. с англ. О. Панича. К.: Дух і літера, 2013. 664 с.
Уотсон П. Эпоха пустоты. Как люди начали жить без Бога, чем заменили религию и что из всего этого вышло / пер. с англ. М. Завалова, Н. Холмогоровой. М.: Эксмо, 2017. 784 с.
Эпштейн М. Проективный словарь гуманитарных наук. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. 616 с.
Berger P., Davie G., Focas E. Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008. 176 p.
Berger P. L. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, 1967.
Casanova J. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994. 330 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001.
Casanova J. Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. Religion, Globalization and Culture / edited by P. Beyer & L. Beaman. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2007. pp. 101–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154070.i-608.39.
Connoly W. Why I am not a Secularist. University of Minnesota Press, 2000. 224 p.
Glasner P. E. The Sociology of Secularization: A Critique of a Concept. L.: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. 137 p.
Hadden J. K. Toward Desacralizing Secularization Theory. Social Forces. Vol. 65. № 3. 1987. pp. 587–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2578520.
Martin D. The Religious and the Secular: Studies in Secularization. L.: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969. 164 p.
On the Power of the Powerless: Dialogue with John D. Caputo. After the Death of God / edited by J. W. Robbins. N.-Y.: Columbia University Press, 2007. 204 p.
Stepan A. The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the “Twin Tolerations”. Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. pp. 218–225.
Whistler D., Smith A. P. What is Continental Philosophy of Religion Now? Editors’ Introduction. After the Postsecular and the Postmodern: New Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2010. pp. 1–24.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.