EXPERIENCE “HUMAN DEATH” IN THE EVIDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CINEMA (M. HANEKE)
Abstract
The purpose of the article is the deployment of the philosophem of “death of man” in the films by M. Haneke. Such a statement of the problem is due to the understanding of art as the ground of philosophy that was to a certain extent already proclaimed by Nietzsche. The art provides such means of relation to the truth, which are deprived of rigid conceptualization and are working basing on the freedom of both the author and the recipient. This is characteristic of the non-classical type of philosophy. In XX–XXI centuries special care is taken over the elimination of subjectivist excessive theorizing, while retaining the attention to the experience of consciousness, phenomenology provides its version of attention to the true meaning with its intention to the reduction of redundant constructions and the discovery of the face and voice of intentional objectivity. If verbal art certainly tends to verbalized judgment, then the cinema provides the possibility of holistic visual, auditory and semantic (logos) perception. Novelty is due to this approach, when the appeal to the cinema is carried out in the interests of philosophy: we get the opportunity to get into the advanced experience, avoiding verbal transcription. This provides the possibility of implementing a philosophical set on critical thinking in the Kantian sense of understanding of the primordial principles invisible in everyday life. Haneke builds his cinema as an open question without a direct answer, which has the purpose of excite the mind and consciousness of the viewer. The active agent of the events is the moral dimension of personal life. According to Haneke, it is in this that one can see the foundations of human existence, the ineffectiveness of the moral and ethical dimension eliminates human in man, which becomes identical with death. Haneke’s interest in truth and contradiction is realized as a radical inquiry about the principles of civilization, which is exacerbated when the usual way of life is destroyed and the system of values does not work. The idea of European civilization moving beyond its own limits possesses not always clearly identified foundations. Contrary to the technocratic variants of the Übermensch as a posthuman, philosophical cinema Haneke returns the significance of personality-existential ethical practices, which involve critique and analytical comprehension of the principles of their own existence.
Downloads
References
/References
Abdullaeva, Z. (2012, June). Authenticist. “Amour”, Directed by Michael Haneke. Iskusstvo Kino – The Art of Cinema, 6. Retrieved from http://old.kinoart.ru/archive/2012/06/autentist-lyubov-rezhisser-mikhael-khaneke. (In Russian).
Allison, D. B. (2001). Reading the New Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy, The Gay Science, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and On the Genealogy of Morals. Rowman & Littlefield.
Amaro, R. (2019). Michael Haneke. Biography. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0359734/bio.
Aristotle. Topics. (M. I. Itkin, Trans.). In Aristotle, The Collected writings in 4 Vol. (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl, 1976. (In Russian).
Babich, B. E. (2009). A Philosophical Shock: Foucault Reading Nietzsche, Reading Heidegger. In C. G. Prado (Ed.), Foucault’s Legacy (рр. 19–41). London: Continuum.
Babich, B. E. (2016). Reading Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy. New Nietzsche Studies, 1/2 (10). doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/newnietzsche2016101/21.
Babich, B. E. (2017). Nietzsche’s Post-Human Imperative: On the “All-too-Human” Dream of Transhumanism. In Yu. Tuncel (Ed.), Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? (рр. 101–132). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ben-Zvi, O. (2017, September). Why Should We Care About Nietzsche’s ‘Higher Men’? European Journal of Philosophy, 3 (25). Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/27764472/Why_Should_We_Care_About_Nietzsches_Higher_Men.
Cohen, T., Colebrook C., & Miller, J. H. (2016). Twilight of the Anthropocene Idols. London: Open Humanities Press.
Daniels, P. R. (2013). Nietzsche and The Birth of Tragedy. Durham: Acumen.
Deljoz, Zh. (2019). About the Death of Man and The Superman. (V. V. Zelenskaja, Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Delez/sm_chel.php.т. (Original work published 1986). (In Russian).
Ferencz-Flatz, Ch., & Hanich, J. (2016). Editors’ Introduction: What is Film Phenomenology? Studia Phaenomenologica, 16 (Film and Phenomenology), 11–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2016161.
Grundmann, R. (Ed.). (2010). A Companion to Michael Haneke. Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320602.
Habermas, J. (2002). Future of Human Nature. (M. L. Khorkov, Trans.). Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russian).
Haneke, M. (1999). Violence Should not be Pleasant to Use (Richard Falcon Talks and Comments). (V. Malahov, Trans.). Iskusstvo kino – The Art of Cinema, 9, 111–115. (In Russian).
Hegel, G. W. F. (1994). Lectures on the History of Philosophy (Book 2). (B. Stolyner, Trans.). Saint-Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).
Heidegger, M. (2008). The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking. (D. V. Smirnov, Trans.). Vox, 5. Retrieved from https://vox-journal.org/content/vox5haidegger.pdf. (Original work published 1964). (In Russian).
Limonchenko, V. V. (2014b, Summer-Autumn). Philosophy and Music. Humanitarnyi Zhurnal – Humanitarian Journal, 3–4. Dnipro: National Mining University Press, 2014, 100–109. (In Russian).
Limonchenko, V. V. (2014a). The Experience of Philosophical Analysis of Anthropological Discourse in Orthodoxy (Monograph). Drogobich: Publishing Department of Drohobych State Pedagogical University named after Ivan Franko. (In Russian).
Loeb, P. S. (2017). Nietzsche’s Transhumanism. In Yu. Tuncel (Ed.), Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? (pp. 83–100). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Michael Haneke: Family Is Hell and So Is the World. (2005b). (E. Kuzmina, Trans.). Retrieved from http://cinema-translations.blogspot.com/2008/03. (In Russian).
Michael Haneke: genre cinema – false. Interview. (2005a, May 30). New Newspaper. Retrieved from https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2005/05/30/25462-mihael-haneke-zhanrovoe-kino-lzhivo. (In Russian).
Michael Haneke: The Bearded Prophet (2001). (Kuzmina, Trans.). Retrieved from http://cinema-translations.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-haneke-bearded-prophet-2001.html. (In Russian).
Nietzsche, F. (1993). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. (A. Onishko, Trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. (In Ukranian).
Plahov, A. (2016). Directors of the Present. In 2 Volumes (Vol. 2. Radicals and Minimalists). Saint-Petersburg: Palmira. (In Russian).
Riker P. (2004). Memory, History, Oblivion. (I. I. Blauberh, I. S. Vdovyna, O. I. Machulskaia, H. M. Tavryzia, Trans.). Moscow: Publishing House of Humanities. (In Russian).
Sorgner, St. L. (2009, March). Nietzsche, the Overhuman, and Transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 1 (20), 29–42. Retrieved from: http://jetpress.org/v20/sorgner.htm.
Tesse, Zh.-F. (2013, February 23). Hurts, Hurts, Hurts. (E. Kalinina, Trans.). Retrieved from https://seance.ru/blog/chtenie/haneke_cahiers. (In Russian).
Tongeren, P. van. (2018). Friedrich Nietzsche and European Nihilism. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq2018584119.
Ungureanu, C. (2014). Sacrifice, Violence and the Limits of Moral Representation in Haneke’s Caché. Angelaki. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 19 (4), 51–63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2014.984435.
Wheatley, C. (2009). Michael Haneke’s Cinema: The Ethic of the Image. New York, London: Berghahn Books.
Абдуллаева З. Аутентист. «Любовь», режиссер Михаэль Ханеке [Электронный ресурс]. Искусство кино. 2012. № 6, июнь. URL: http://old.kinoart.ru/archive/2012/06/autentist-lyubov-rezhisser-mikhael-khaneke.
Аристотель. Топика / пер. с древнегреч. М. И. Иткина. Сочинения: в 4-х т.; т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1976. С. 347–531.
Гегель Г. В. Ф. Лекции по истории философии / пер. с нем. Б. Столинера. Кн. 2. СПб.: Наука, 1994. С. 5–423.
Делёз Ж. О смерти человека и о сверхчеловеке [Электронный ресурс] / пер. с франц. В. В. Зеленская. 2019. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Delez/sm_chel.php.
Лимонченко В. В. Опыт философской аналитики антропологического дискурса в Православии: монография. Дрогобич: Видавничий відділ Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка, 2014a. 482 c.
Лимонченко В. В. Философия и музыка. Гуманітарний журнал. Літо-осінь, № 3-4. Дніпро: Вид-во Національного гірничого ун-ту, 2014b. С. 100–109.
Михаэль Ханеке: бородатый пророк [Электронный ресурс] / пер. Е. Кузьмина. 2001. URL: http://cinema-translations.blogspot.com/2009/06/michael-haneke-bearded-prophet-2001.html.
Михаэль Ханеке: жанровое кино – лживо. Интервью. [Электронный ресурс]. Новая газета. 2005a, 30 мая. URL: https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2005/05/30/25462-mihael-haneke-zhanrovoe-kino-lzhivo.
Михаэль Ханеке: Семья – это ад. И мир тоже [Электронный ресурс] / пер. Е. Кузьмина. 2005b. URL: http://cinema-translations.blogspot.com/2008/03.
Ніцше Ф. Так казав Заратустра / пер. з нім. А. Онишко. К.: Основи, 1993. С. 7–328.
Плахов А. Радикалы и минималисты. Режиссеры настоящего: в 2-х т.; т. 2. СПб.: Пальмира, 2016. 319 с.
Рикер П. Память, история, забвение / пер. с франц. И. И. Блауберг, И. С. Вдовина, О. И. Мачульская, Г. М. Тавризя. М.: Издательство гуманитарной литературы, 2004. 728 с.
Тессе Ж.-Ф. Больно, больно, больно [Электронный ресурс] / пер. Е. Калинина. 2013, 23 февраля. URL: https://seance.ru/blog/chtenie/haneke_cahiers.
Хабермас Ю. Будущее человеческой природы / пер. с нем. М. Л. Хорькова. М.: Весь Мир, 2002. 144 с.
Хайдеггер М. Конец философии и задача мышления [Электронный ресурс] / пер. с нем. Д. В. Смирнова. Vox. 2008. № 5. URL: https://vox-journal.org/content/vox5haidegger.pdf.
Ханеке М. Насилие не должно быть приятным в употреблении (Беседу ведёт и комментирует Р. Фэлкон) / пер. с англ. В. Малахов. Искусство кино. 1999. № 9. С. 111–115.
Allison D. B. Reading the New Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy, The Gay Science, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and On the Genealogy of Morals. Rowman & Littlefield, 2001. 338 p.
Amaro R. Michael Haneke. Biography. [Electronic resource]. 2019. URL: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0359734/bio.
Babich B. E. A Philosophical Shock: Foucault Reading Nietzsche, Reading Heidegger. Foucault’s Legacy / ed. by C. G. Prado. London: Continuum, 2009. P. 19–41.
Babich B. E. Nietzsche’s Post-Human Imperative: On the “All-too-Human” Dream of Transhumanism. Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? / Yu. Tuncel (Ed.). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. pp. 101–132.
Babich B. E. Reading Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy. New Nietzsche Studies. 2016.Volume 10, Issue 1/2. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/newnietzsche2016101/21.
Ben‐Zvi O. Why Should We Care About Nietzsche’s ‘Higher Men’? [Electronic resource]. European Journal of Philosophy, 2017. Volume 25, Issue 3 (September), pp. 638–656. URL: http://www.academia.edu/27764472/Why_Should_We_Care_About_Nietzsches_Higher_Men.
Cohen T., Colebrook C., Miller J. H. Twilight of the Anthropocene Idols. London: Open Humanities Press, 2016. 222 p.
Daniels P. R. Nietzsche and The Birth of Tragedy. Durham: Acumen, 2013. 256 p.
Ferencz-Flatz Ch., Hanich J. Editors’ Introduction: What is Film Phenomenology? Studia Phaenomenologica. 2016. Volume 16. Film and Phenomenology. pp. 11–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen2016161.
Grundmann R. (Ed.). A Companion to Michael Haneke. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 656 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320602.
Loeb P. S. Nietzsche’s Transhumanism. Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? / Ed. by Yu. Tuncel. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. pp. 83–100.
Sorgner St. L. Nietzsche, the Overhuman, and Transhumanism. [Electronic resource]. Journal of Evolution and Technology. Vol. 20. Issue 1. March 2009. pp. 29–42. URL: http://jetpress.org/v20/sorgner.htm.
Tongeren P. van. Friedrich Nietzsche and European Nihilism. Сambridge: Scholars Publishing, 2018. 208 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq2018584119.
Ungureanu C. Sacrifice, Violence and the Limits of Moral Representation in Haneke’s Caché. Angelaki. Journal of the theoretical humanities. 2014. № 19 (4). pp. 51–63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2014.984435.
Wheatley C. Michael Haneke’s Cinema: The Ethic of the Image. New York; London: Berghahn Books, 2009. 234 p.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.