BETWEEN IMAGE AND GESTURE: GROUPE μ VISUAL RHETORIC WITHIN THE METAMODERN HORIZON

Keywords: Groupe μ, visual rhetoric, metamodernism, post-figurativity, affect, screenality, gesture

Abstract

This article explores the evolution of Groupe μ visual rhetoric within the context of metamodern aesthetics. The foundational tenets of their work, Traité du signe visuel (1992), are analyzed as the theoretical basis for an affective semiotics of the image. The paper clarifies the notion of post-figurativity as a metamodern gesture that enables a sensuous-affective interaction between the image and the viewer. It is demonstrated that post-figurative thinking shapes a new rhetoric of co-being, where the image functions not as a representation, but as an event of shared affect.

The phenomenon of the post-figurative image is analyzed within the context of metamodernism's aesthetics. The authors consider post-figurativity as a form of visual gesture that embodies doubt, affect, and an invitation to co-being. Through examples of contemporary visual images, it is shown how the post-figurative emerges not as a representation, but as an affective event open to mutual interpretation.

Furthermore, the authors analyze the phenomenon of screenality (or écranité) in metamodern culture and explain the methodological significance of Groupe μ contribution for understanding this feature of contemporary life. Screenality is interpreted as a condition of shared presence, where affect becomes a new type of communicative action, and the screen functions as a space of co-presence. Metamodern culture is defined not merely as a culture of images, but as a screen culture in which screenality transforms into a new ontology of vision, forming an interface of empathy where the spectator becomes a co-participant in the visual.

The conclusion asserts that Groupe μ conception of visual rhetoric established the groundwork for understanding the image as a structural system of signs where form possesses cognitive status. This concept resonates with the logic of metamodern culture, engaging it in communication and creating not an image as a message, but an image as an echo of co-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrii Artemenko, National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute"

Artemenko Andrii P.

D.Sc.in Philosophy

Professor of the Philosophy and Social Disciplines Department

National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute"

17, V. Manka st., Kharkiv, 61070, Ukraine

Margaret Kravchenko, Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts

Kravchenko Margaret

Master's student

Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts

8, Mystetstv St., Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine

References

Artemenko, A.P. (2022). Multiculturalism as an element of postmodern social practice. Ideology and politics journal, 2(21), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2022.02.00001 (In Ukrainian).

Artemenko, A.P.(2023). Aesthetics as the implementation of "soft power": exploiting the ability to feel. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences, 1 (93), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.35433/PhilosophicalSciences.1(93).2023.109-123 (In Ukrainian)

Groupe μ. (1992). Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l’image. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Klinkenberg, J.-M. (2000). Précis de sémiotique générale. Paris: Seuil. (1re éd. 1996)

Manovich, L. (2001). T'he Language of New Media. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.

Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of Affect. London: Polity Press.

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.

Parikka, J. (2012). New Materialism as Media Theory: Medianatures and Dirty Matter. Communication and Critical. Cultural Studies, 9(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2011.626252

Shaviro, S. (2016). The Universe of Things. Critical Inquiry, 42, 3, 542–568 http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Things.pdf

Sloterdijk, P. (1998). Sphären I: Blasen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

van den Akker R., Vermeulen T., Gibbons A. (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. 2010. Vol. 2. Issue 1. Article: 5677 | Published online: 25 Jan 2017 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677#d1e400 https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

Published
2025-11-24
Cited
How to Cite
Artemenko, A., & Kravchenko, M. (2025). BETWEEN IMAGE AND GESTURE: GROUPE μ VISUAL RHETORIC WITHIN THE METAMODERN HORIZON. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (73), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-73-2
Section
Articles