METAMODERN SOCIOLOGY: LEGITIMIZATION OF THE PRECARIATE IN THE AESTHETIC PARADIGM
Abstract
This article is dedicated to analyzing the social foundations of metamodern culture in the context of transformations in the social space of the early 21st century. It critiques the reductive understanding of metamodernism merely as an aesthetic sensibility, emphasizing instead its deep entanglement with social transformations and structural shifts in society. The theoretical framework of the study is grounded in the works of U. Beck, A. Giddens, G. Standing, as well as in methodological approaches drawn from actor-network theory and topological analysis, which enable the interpretation of culture as a complex network of socially conditioned meanings and preferences. A key theme is the influence of socio-economic changes on the aesthetic paradigm of metamodernism. The article traces how shifts in societal structures—particularly the emergence of the precariat—shape new forms of aesthetic demand. Special attention is given to the legitimization of new cultural forms by art institutions. The study also examines the consequences of the post-ideological era, the ideological crises of multiculturalism, the rise of imagined communities, and cultural responses to global migration processes.
The article further analyzes symbolic expressions of contemporary identity through the lens of the 60th Venice Biennale of 2024, where the theme of "the Other" acquired profound cultural significance. At the center of analysis is the ambivalence of the contemporary West, which simultaneously reproduces colonial narratives and seeks critical reflection upon them. The article concludes that metamodernism is not merely an aesthetic phenomenon but primarily a social one, representing a networked logic of cultural formation in the new post-industrial age. It argues that within metamodern culture, aesthetics serves not only a representational function but also a legitimizing one—responding to a social reality shaped by new classes, altered labor markets, and global identities.
Downloads
References
Artemenko, A. P. (2022). MULTICULTURALISM AS AN ELEMENT OF POSTMODERN SOCIAL PRACTICE. Ideology and Politics Journal, 2 (21), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2022.02.00001 (In Ukrainian)
Artemenko, A. P.(2023) AESTHETICS AS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF "SOFT POWER": EXPLOITING THE ABILITY TO FEEL. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences, 1 (93), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.35433/PhilosophicalSciences.1(93).2023.109-123 (In Ukrainian)
Fridman, T. L. (2008) The World is Flat. The Globalized World in the Twenty-First Century. Kyiv: Akta. (In Ukrainian)
Beck, Ulrich (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity Translated by Ritter, Mark. London: Sage Publications
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674212770
Böhme, G. (1993) Atmosphere as the Fundamental Concept of a New Aesthetics. https://web.archive.org/web/20180329014449/http://desteceres.com/boehme.pdf
Drayton, T. (2024) Metamodernism in Contemporary British Theatre: A Politics of Hope/lessness. Methuen Drama.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books. https://creativeclass.com/rise-of-the-creative-class/
Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives (2nd ed.). London: Profile Books
Georgina, А. (2024) Venice Biennale 2024 Review: Intimacy and Violence – ‘Foreigners Everywhere’ Explodes the Biennale Model. The Art Newspaper, April 19, 2024. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/04/19/venice-biennale-2024-review-%7C-intimacy-and-violence-foreigners-everywhere-explodes-the-biennale-model
Mann, M. (2005) The Climbing of the Dark Side: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge University Press,
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/precariat-9781849663553/
Vermeulen, T., van den Akker, R. Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. Volume 2, 2010 - Issue 1. Article: 5677 | Published online: 25 Jan 2017 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677#d1e400 https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.
Copyright (c) 2025 Андрій Артеменко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



