THE PHENOMENON OF SOLIDARITY IN POST-POLITICAL CONSENSUS
Abstract
The profound transformation of all aspects of society's existence, which began in the last quarter of the previous century and continues to this day, has changed almost the entire structure of social relations, both in its morphological and substantive plans. Social solidarity is presented as a dynamic and non-guaranteed state arising in the course of human interaction and requiring constant activity of all participants of the interactive process. The main integrative role is played by joint action and its interpretations, the proximity of which ensures the consolidation of society. The influence of solidarity on the reproduction function of the social system at all its hierarchical levels – from groups of primary social practices to the society as a whole – has been studied. It is substantiated that the state or level of social solidarity in society determines the degree of harmony of its functioning, and in general determines the life chances and prospects of this society. It is noted that the reduction of solidarity carries a threat of social disintegration. It is emphasized that in the normal functioning of society, solidarity is the object of unremitting attention, both on the part of the ruling group in society, whose actions are almost inseparable from the goals of reproduction of society and its power, and on the part of other social institutions, whose activities are directly conditioned by the level of consolidation and cooperation of their members. Accordingly, a state of social relations in which neither the authorities nor other institutions demonstrates adequate concern for the degree of consolidation of the social whole cannot be considered normal. It is shown that within the post-political consensus, class identity appears as the result of a specific political gesture – a political and discursive construction. Political-discursive analysis is defined as an independent and self-sufficient methodology that enables a new perspective on traditional objects of political inquiry, such as populist movements and ideologies, large-scale social conflicts, the absolutization of ideology, and the ideologization of the functioning of various societal discourses.
Downloads
References
Badiou, A. (2013). Rhapsody for the theatre (B. Bosteels, Trans.). London: Verso.
Balibar, E. (2023, December 13). Palestine, Ukraine and other wars of extermination: The local and the global [Lecture]. Bisan Lecture Series, Scientists for Palestine. https://aurdip.org/en/bisan-lecture-series-etienne-balibar-palestine-ukraine-and-other-wars-of-extermination-the-local-and-the-global/.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cernat, M. (2023). Progressivism and war: Feminist discourse on the armed conflict in Ukraine. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation, 10(19), 1–9.
Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Picador.
Gago, V. (2020). Feminist international: How to change everything (L. Mason-Deese, Trans.). Verso.
Geiselberg, H. (Ed.). (2017). The great regression. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London; New York: Verso.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
O'Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue: A constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2004). Legality and legitimacy (J. Seitzer, Trans. & Ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary forms of life (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
White, J. (2023). In the long run: The future as a political idea. London, UK: Profile Books.
Žižek, S. (2023). Freedom: A disease without cure. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic
Copyright (c) 2025 Михайло Бейлін, Олександр Желтобородов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of this work under the terms of a license Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


3.gif)



