THE PHENOMENON OF SOLIDARITY IN POST-POLITICAL CONSENSUS

Keywords: agonistic public space, cross-border alliances, dynamic democracy, neoliberal globalization, post-political world, forms of identification, non-alternativity of the existing order, transnational institutions, solidarity

Abstract

The profound transformation of all aspects of society's existence, which began in the last quarter of the previous century and continues to this day, has changed almost the entire structure of social relations, both in its morphological and substantive plans. Social solidarity is presented as a dynamic and non-guaranteed state arising in the course of human interaction and requiring constant activity of all participants of the interactive process. The main integrative role is played by joint action and its interpretations, the proximity of which ensures the consolidation of society. The influence of solidarity on the reproduction function of the social system at all its hierarchical levels – from groups of primary social practices to the society as a whole – has been studied. It is substantiated that the state or level of social solidarity in society determines the degree of harmony of its functioning, and in general determines the life chances and prospects of this society. It is noted that the reduction of solidarity carries a threat of social disintegration. It is emphasized that in the normal functioning of society, solidarity is the object of unremitting attention, both on the part of the ruling group in society, whose actions are almost inseparable from the goals of reproduction of society and its power, and on the part of other social institutions, whose activities are directly conditioned by the level of consolidation and cooperation of their members. Accordingly, a state of social relations in which neither the authorities nor other institutions demonstrates adequate concern for the degree of consolidation of the social whole cannot be considered normal. It is shown that within the post-political consensus, class identity appears as the result of a specific political gesture – a political and discursive construction. Political-discursive analysis is defined as an independent and self-sufficient methodology that enables a new perspective on traditional objects of political inquiry, such as populist movements and ideologies, large-scale social conflicts, the absolutization of ideology, and the ideologization of the functioning of various societal discourses.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mykhailo Beilin, Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

Beilin Mykhailo V.

D.Sc.in Philosophy, PhD in Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Humanities

Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

99 Klochkivska str., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

Oleksandr Zheltoborodov, Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

Zheltoborodov Oleksandr M.

PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Humanities

Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

99 Klochkivska str., Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine

References

Badiou, A. (2013). Rhapsody for the theatre (B. Bosteels, Trans.). London: Verso.

Balibar, E. (2023, December 13). Palestine, Ukraine and other wars of extermination: The local and the global [Lecture]. Bisan Lecture Series, Scientists for Palestine. https://aurdip.org/en/bisan-lecture-series-etienne-balibar-palestine-ukraine-and-other-wars-of-extermination-the-local-and-the-global/.

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cernat, M. (2023). Progressivism and war: Feminist discourse on the armed conflict in Ukraine. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation, 10(19), 1–9.

Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Picador.

Gago, V. (2020). Feminist international: How to change everything (L. Mason-Deese, Trans.). Verso.

Geiselberg, H. (Ed.). (2017). The great regression. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London; New York: Verso.

Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

O'Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue: A constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, C. (2004). Legality and legitimacy (J. Seitzer, Trans. & Ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary forms of life (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).

White, J. (2023). In the long run: The future as a political idea. London, UK: Profile Books.

Žižek, S. (2023). Freedom: A disease without cure. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic

Published
2025-06-30
Cited
How to Cite
Beilin, M., & Zheltoborodov, O. (2025). THE PHENOMENON OF SOLIDARITY IN POST-POLITICAL CONSENSUS. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (72), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-72-20
Section
Articles