DIGITAL URBANISM: ONTOLOGY OF HYBRID URBAN SPACES IN THE AGE OF DIGITALIZATION

Keywords: digital urbanism, code/space, platform urbanism, hybrid spaces, digital mediation, real-time city, infrastructuring, data architecture, sociotechnical reality

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the phenomenon of digital urbanism as a transdisciplinary research field integrating philosophical, engineering-technical, socio-spatial, culturological, and information–communication paradigms. Digital urbanism is conceptualized as an epistemological strategy for understanding the transformative processes occurring in the modern city under the influence of digital technologies, and as a theoretical framework for analyzing the new ontology of urban space. The key concepts of digital urbanism are explored: code/space, platform urbanism, real-time city and infrastructuring, which form the theoretical apparatus for understanding the hybridization of the urban environment. The technological components of the city's digital transformation are analyzed: the Internet of Things, big data, artificial intelligence, geographic information systems, and mobile interfaces, which act as tools for constructing a new urban reality. Particular attention is paid to the phenomenon of urban space hybridization, where the physical and digital environments mutually constitute each other, creating new modes of perception and interaction. The transformation of the city's spatio-temporal structures is explicated, in particular, the transition from cyclical temporality to the logic of constant updating and from static spaces to dynamic flows. The influence of digital mediation on urban experience is revealed, where technological interfaces become key intermediaries in the subject's interaction with urban space, forming individualized routes and personalized cartographic representations. The aesthetic aspects of the digital city are analyzed, including the formation of a new visual culture and data architecture. A critical analysis of the social, cultural, and ethical implications of digital urbanization is carried out, particularly the problems of the digital divide, privacy, and algorithmic governance. The city is conceptualized as a platform and information environment operating in real-time, transforming traditional notions of urban space and catalyzing emergent forms of sociality. The necessity of integrating technological innovations with a critical reflection of the social, cultural, and ethical aspects of the city's digital transformation is substantiated for the formation of a balanced approach to the development of the urban environment in the age of digitalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mykyta Miazin, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Miazin Mykyta V.

PhD Student, Faculty of Philosophy

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

4, Maidan Svobody, Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Barns, S. (2020). Platform urbanism: Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Palgrave Macmillan.

Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Excavating AI: The Politics of Images in Machine Learning Training Sets. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8.

de Waal, M. (2014). The city as interface: How new media are changing the city. Rotterdam: nai010 Publishers.

Goodchild, M. F. (2009). Geographic Information Systems and Science: Today and Tomorrow. Annals of GIS, 1, 1, 1037-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2009.09.160

Kitchin, R. (2014). The Real–Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8

Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/Space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001

Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T., & McArdle, G. (2015). Smart Cities and the Politics of Urban Data, pp. 17-34. Smart Urbanism. Utopian vision or false dawn? London: Routledge. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/297022243.pdf

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network–theory. Oxford University Press.

Law, J. (1986). On the Methods of Long Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India, pp. 234-263. John Law (ed), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph 32. Routledge, Henley.

Manovich, L. (2006). The Poetics of Augmented Space: Learning from Prada. Visual Communication, 5(2), 219–240.

Mattern, S. (2015). Deep mapping the media city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Mattern, S. (2017). Code and clay, data and dirt: Five thousand years of urban media. University of Minnesota Press.

Picon, A. (2015). Smart cities: A spatialised intelligence. Wiley.

Ratti, C., & Claudel, M. (2016). The city of tomorrow: Sensors, networks, hackers, and the future of urban life. Yale University Press.

Thrift, N. (2004). Movement–Space: The Changing Domain of Thinking Resulting from the Development of New Kinds of Spatial Awareness. Economy and Society, 33(4), 582–604.

Thrift, N. (2011). Lifeworld Inc – and what to do about it. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(1), 5–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d0310

Published
2025-06-30
Cited
How to Cite
Miazin, M. (2025). DIGITAL URBANISM: ONTOLOGY OF HYBRID URBAN SPACES IN THE AGE OF DIGITALIZATION. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, (72), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.26565/2226-0994-2025-72-13
Section
Articles