Space-time analysis of the impact of military operations on the territory of the Emerald Network within Kharkiv region

Keywords: Emerald Network, nature conservation, unique species and habitats, protected areas, military operations, spatio-temporal analysis, Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyse the state of the Emerald Network within the Kharkiv region in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. The article briefly describes the history of the formation of the Emerald Network of the Kharkiv region and provides a modern list of Emerald Network sites, according to the data of the Standing Committee of the Council of Europe, which includes 38 sites with a total area of 3830 thousand square km. And 3 sites that are substantiated and included in the “shadow lists” of further expansion of the Network.

Main content. The article presents an analysis of the state of the Emerald Network territories within the Kharkiv region in wartime conditions. The analysis was performed for three key dates, taking into account changes in the front line within the region: April 3, 2022 (when about 30% of the region was occupied), September 16, 2022 (after the successful counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the liberation of almost the entire territory of the region), and May 26, 2025 (the current stage with the enemy advancing in the Kupyansk and Chuhuiv districts throughout the period from September 2022). For each of the indicated dates, maps were drawn up with the current front line superimposed, indicating the occupied and liberated territories, which allowed for a spatiotemporal analysis of the impact of military operations on the Emerald Network territory and identifying those sites that were under occupation, on the front line or in close proximity to it. Such analysis made it possible to identify territories that were affected by various forms of war – both direct and indirect.

Conclusions. The analysis showed that 48% (1830 thousand square km) of the Emerald Network of the region were affected by military actions of varying degrees at different periods. And these are to a greater extent the most valuable areas of the steppe biogeographical region of Europe. The sites within the Siversky Donets and Oskil valleys were most affected, and these are the largest in area and the most diverse in terms of the number of species and habitats. The analysis of the impact of the war on unique nature conservation areas made it possible to identify potential areas for further research and monitoring.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maksym Zaliubovskyi, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD student of the Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

Ksenia Filatova, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Bachelor of the Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

Oksana Zaliubovska, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD (Geography), Associate Professor of the Department of Physical Geography and Cartography

References

Bainazarov, A., Popov, V., Vovk, U., & Piliugin, A. (2024). Dynamics of forest fires in the Izium district caused by hostilities. Problems of Continuous Geographical Education and Cartography, 40, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2024-40-02 [іn Ukrainian].

Kharkiv Regional Military (State) Administration, Department of Environmental Protection and Nature Use. (2022). Report on the state of the environment in Kharkiv region in 2022. [іn Ukrainian].

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2023). Ecological passport of Kharkiv region. https://menr.gov.ua/news32629.html [іn Ukrainian].

Zaliubovska, O., Zaliubovskyi, M., & Sinna, O. (2023). Рrotected areas of Kharkiv region in the conditions of military operations. Problems of Continuous Geographical Education and Cartography, 38, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2023-38-01 [іn Ukrainian].

Zaliubovskyi, M. Ye. (2024). Protected areas of the Oskil River valley under war conditions. Geographical research: history, present, perspectives (pp. 33–39). V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. [in Ukrainian].

Zaliubovskyi, M. Ye. (2025). The Emerald Network of Kharkiv region under war in Ukraine. Current problems of formal and non-formal education on environmental monitoring and nature conservation: Proceedings of the IV International Internet Conference (pp. 19–20). V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. [in Ukrainian].

Kharkiv Regional State Administration. (2025). Strategic environmental assessment report of the state planning document of the economic and social development program of Kharkiv region for 2025. https://kharkivoda.gov.ua/content/documents/1293/129233/Attaches/ostzvit_pro_seo_pesr_u_ho_2025.pdf [in Ukrainian].

War map of Ukraine. (n.d.). https://deepstatemap.live [іn Ukrainian].

Emerald Network. Cartographic web application. (n.d.). https://emerald.net.ua/ [іn Ukrainian].

Council of the European Communities. (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31992L0043 [іn Ukrainian].

Parkhomenko, V. V., & Vasyliuk, O. V. (2022). Protected areas and the Russian-Ukrainian war. Modern Phytosozological Research in Ukraine, Kyiv. (6). [іn Ukrainian].

Vasyliuk, O., Borysenko, K., Kuzemko, A., Marushchak, O., Tiestov, P., & Hrynyk, Ye. (2019). Design and conservation of Emerald Network sites: Methodological materials. LAT & K. [іn Ukrainian].

Borysenko, K., & Kuzemko, A. (Eds.). (2019). Territories proposed for inclusion in the Emerald Network of Ukraine (“shadow list”, part 2). LAT & K. [іn Ukrainian].

Vasyliuk, O., Kuzemko, A., Kolomiichuk, V., & Kutsokon, Yu. (Eds.). (2020). Territories proposed for inclusion in the Emerald Network of Ukraine (“shadow list”, part 3). Druk Art. [іn Ukrainian].

Kuzemko, A., Sadogurska, S., Borysenko, K., & Vasyliuk, O. (2017). Explanatory manual of habitats of Resolution No. 4 of the Bern Convention under threat and requiring special conservation measures (3rd draft, 2015). Adapted unofficial translation from English. Kyiv. [іn Ukrainian].

Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group. (n.d.). https://uncg.org.ua/ [іn Ukrainian].

Kharkiv Regional State Administration, Department of Ecology and Natural Resources. (n.d.). https://kharkivoda.gov.ua/oblasna-derzhavna-administratsiya/struktura-administratsiyi/strukturni-pidrozdili/486 [іn Ukrainian].

Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group. (n.d.). Why Emerald territories and Ukraine’s European integration are inseparably linked and what is at stake during their occupation. https://uncg.org.ua/chomu-smarahdovi-terytorii-ta-ievrointehratsiia-ukrainy-nerozryvno-pov-iazani-i-shcho-postavleno-na-kartu-pid-chas-ikhnoi-okupatsii/ [іn Ukrainian].

Council of Europe. (2019a). Updated list of officially adopted Emerald sites (December 2019). Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. Standing Committee, 39th meeting, Strasbourg, 3–6 December 2019. https://rm.coe.int/updated-list-of-officially-adopted-emerald-sitesdecember-2019-/168098ef51 [іn English].

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2009). Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0147 [іn English].

Emergency Management Service. (n.d.). Current situation viewer. https://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/effis_current_situation [іn English].

Council of Europe. (1998). Resolution No. 6 listing the species requiring specific habitat conservation measures. http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/references/2439) [іn English].

Council of Europe. (2010). Revised Annex I of Resolution 4 (1996) of the Bern Convention on endangered natural habitats types using the EUNIS habitat classification (year of revision 2010). http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/references/2442 [іn English].

Published
2025-10-07
How to Cite
Zaliubovskyi, M., Filatova, K., & Zaliubovska, O. (2025). Space-time analysis of the impact of military operations on the territory of the Emerald Network within Kharkiv region. Problems of Continuous Geographic Education and Cartography, (42), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1893-2025-42-06
Section
Статті